flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Unique test facility will help make wind power more feasible

Building Team Awards

Unique test facility will help make wind power more feasible

A new facility at Clemson University makes it possible to test the huge stresses that large-scale wind turbines must be able to withstand.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | April 7, 2015
Unique test facility will help make wind power more feasible

The Clemson University SCE&G Energy Innovation Center, where giant wind-power systems can be tested. Photo: Ryan Manchester, Clear Sky Images

This article first appeared in the April 2015 issue of BD+C.

The U.S. Energy Department wants wind power to provide at least 20% of the nation’s energy needs by 2030, compared to 3.5% in 2013. Until recently, manufacturers have not been able to replicate on a sufficiently large scale the stress forces that offshore wind turbines must be able to endure.

In 2009, DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy awarded $45 million—its largest single wind-power grant—to Clemson University to build a facility capable of full-scale, highly accelerated testing of the next generation of wind turbine drive-train technology.

The Clemson University Restoration Institute converted a decommissioned Navy warehouse in North Charleston, S.C., into the SCE&G Energy Innovation Center, where such testing is now feasible. The facility also houses Duke Energy’s 15-megawatt eGrid simulator, which tests and validates the impact of electric equipment turbines on the nation’s aging electrical grid.

The project’s sheer magnitude made it a design, engineering, and construction feat. Much of the equipment installed in the facility had never been used before. With design teams and suppliers in the U.S. and Europe, a considerable degree of planning and coordination was required.

PROJECT SUMMARY
GOLD AWARD
Clemson University SCE&G Energy Innovation Center
North Charleston, S.C.

BUILDING TEAM
Submitting firm: Choate Construction Co. (GC/CM)
Owner: Clemson University Restoration Institute
Architect/MP engineer: Davis & Floyd
Structural/electrical engineer: AEC Engineering

GENERAL INFORMATION
Project size: 82,264 sf
Construction cost: $37.3 million
Construction period: September 2011 to February 2014
Delivery method: CM at risk

“This project took the meaning of complexity to a whole new level,” says Drew Clark, Senior Project Manager for Clark Construction, a Building Team Awards judge. “When you understand the coordination, logistics, and extreme tolerances—fractions of an inch—required to support the test equipment, you get the sense that they were building something of a Swiss watch, not just a building. Very impressive.”

To meet seismic code requirements, over 900 steel H and concrete piles, ranging in length from 40 to 85 feet and weighing more than 400 pounds, were driven—the equivalent of nine miles of pilings.

The testing equipment included 7.5- and 15-MW hydraulic dynamometers that can replicate the severe rotating and bending forces exerted on the drive trains by 300-foot-long wind turbine blades at sea. Controlling these forces required two testing bays with dynamic independent foundations that could accommodate the massive torque of the testing system, plus the weight of the rigs. A single gearbox weighs 341 tons, or the equivalent of a Boeing 747.

Because the test rigs were so deep and embedded with congested rebar—the 15-MW foundation was 42 feet wide by 100 feet long by 15 feet deep—concrete couldn’t be pumped and vibrated. The Building Team specified self-consolidating concrete with chemical viscosity modifiers that allowed the concrete to flow throughout the rebar and formwork without the need for vibration. The concrete was poured in a single, continuous 12-hour run for each test rig.

There’s over 900 tons of rebar in the test bed foundations, bent to nearly micron levels. The Building Team used BIM modeling to identify 8,500 conflicts in the foundation before construction.

The Building Team also designed an anchor system so turbines could be moved around and repositioned during testing. Four hundred anchor sleeves and 15 assembled arrays were installed; each was measured during fabrication, assembly, setting, and as-built condition.

One anchoring assembly is the 15-MW Load Application Unit (LAU), also known as “Death Star.” The LAU ring, which had to be transported 250 miles in four pieces to the site, required 96 6.5-foot-long tubes. In full field operation, one million pounds of steel components will be cantilevered off of the ring and its surrounding concrete structure.

 

Its dynamometers require 22.5 MW of electricity to operate at full capacity, or enough to power 15,000–25,000 homes per year. The facility recovers about 80% of that energy, resulting in energy cost savings of 60.3% and contributing to the project’s LEED Gold certification. Photo: Ryan Manchester, Clear Sky Images

 

Crews laid down 900 tons of rebar in the test bed foundations. Specialty concrete was poured in a single run to make sure the concrete penetrated the rebar without the use of vibration equipment.

Related Stories

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

Big D’s billion-dollar baby: New Parkland Hospital Tops the Chart | BD+C

Dallas’s new $1.27 billion public hospital preserves an important civic anchor, Texas-style.

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

IPD-driven fusion facility serves science and student life in Chicago

In dire need of modern science labs and a student union, North Park University built both—in the same building.

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

‘Prudent, not opulent’ sets the tone for this Catholic hospital

This Building Team stuck with a project for seven years to get a new hospital built for a faithful client.

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

9/11 museum triumphs over controversy

The Building Team for this highly visible project had much more than design, engineering, and construction problems to deal with.

Building Team Awards | Apr 5, 2015

UK's leading foot and mouth disease lab turns containment design inside out

A daring Building Team breaks the bunker mentality common to research containment with this light-filled, open facility in the English countryside.

Building Team Awards | Apr 5, 2015

‘Project first’ philosophy shows team’s commitment to a true IPD on the San Carlos Center

Skanska and NBBJ join forces with Sutter Health on a medical center project where all three parties share the risk.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021