flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain

Building Materials

Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain

Austin Commercial’s Jason Earnhardt explains why supply chain issues for the construction industry are not going to go away and how developers and owners can get ahead of project roadblocks.


By Jason Earnhardt, Supply Chain Manager, Austin Commercial | June 20, 2022
Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain
Photo: Pixabay

Anyone who has taken even a passing glance at the news over the last year has become acutely aware of the supply chain. Empty grocery store shelves may be the first image that springs to mind, but when it comes to the construction industry, the discussion is a little more nuanced.

First, let’s define our terms. The true supply chain is material tracking from cradle to grave. It is an entire system designed to identify a need, acquire the need, and deliver the need. In the just-in-time (JIT) model used by companies from Walmart to Dell to the biggest names in construction, the system has minimal lag time and little room for inefficiency.

In a consumer-facing JIT inventory system, say for computers, a company would have just enough parts on hand to fulfill the current need. Customers order, the company puts together the product and ships it out. The system ideally works together in perfect harmony. Until it doesn't. Just one hitch in the system, let alone several, and the entire ecosystem falls apart. 

In construction, JIT has been the modus operandi for decades. The material is delivered to site as and when it is needed. This model does have a number of benefits of course—lower required cashflow upfront and a limited need for storage and security. But, as we saw starting in March of 2020, unforeseen events can have a catastrophic ripple effect on a JIT model. 

As widely used as JIT has been, it has never been truly efficient. There are hundreds of moving parts and risk baked into the calculus. The model didn’t need to account for extreme employment variables, local policy restricting movement and workforce, increased costs associated with delays, shortages and fluctuating commodities. In the old model, LEAN upgrades helped to tighten up the system, but was never intended to account for all of these global variables.

As we see it here at Austin, the last two years have given us the opportunity to reinvent how construction works, how we can own the process of supply chain, and how we can pass on what we’ve learned to our clients.

A Supply Chain House of Cards

The disruption to the construction supply chain has gone far beyond just difficulty obtaining materials. Frozen finances, limited workforce and shortened workforce weeks have all stopped projects in their tracks. And that’s just on-site—on the manufacturing side, staff shortages and difficulties sourcing raw material are compounding the challenges for projects across the country. 

The truth is that supply chain problems will likely get much worse if the entire system doesn’t change. COVID may have been the reason that we put a magnifying glass on the inefficiencies and risk inherent to the JIT model, but the system was always very fragile. Now that we see it can come down as quickly as a house of cards, it’s time for a new way of managing the construction supply chain. A holistic view that combines logistics, risk mitigation and a new procurement process all tied together with analytics.

A New Way Forward for the Construction Supply Chain

In the traditional model, supply chain issues would often trickle down to the sub-contractors. GCs, subs and trades would procure parts from a local supplier and, more often than not, the owner wouldn’t know or care, as long as the project was getting done. That is simply is not a viable workflow any longer as local part suppliers are rarely an option and cash flow is a real issue for even medium-sized GCs. 

So how are we fixing this? How are we continuing to get projects done in this climate? We are customizing our project management process for each client but, in general, we are using a number of tools and risk-mitigation strategies and looking at the supply chain in a holistic way.

The biggest weapon in our arsenal at the moment is early-stage procurement. We are going out at the beginning of a project and instead of making purchases for each phase, we are getting all the materials for the project on site and storing it. We get our hands on all the materials, we stock it, we store it and protect it on campus for as long as necessary. We are procuring extra equipment for material storage like forklifts and box trailers and adding resources to get everything moved around and in the right place. On one of our largest projects, we have essentially created our own “microport” with highly detailed and trackable logistics to keep everything running smoothly and on time. 

It takes experience and expertise to make this all work efficiently, but the new model gives us price protection in a volatile marketplace. It gives us the peace of mind of accounting for everything we need ahead of time. And it gives us more control in an increasingly uncertain world.

New Roadblocks to a New Process

Clearly, revolutionizing a model that has been in place for decades won’t come without snags. With that said, none of the challenges we’ve faced so far have been insurmountable. But they do require our clients to look at the supply chain in a new way. For instance, upfront procurement requires different financing and more funding at the beginning.

And of course, the biggest and most fundamental challenge of all: cash flow. Yes, this way of handling the supply chain costs money in exchange for on-time project delivery. On pre-pandemic contracts, none of these costs were accounted for. In private deals, GCs are issuing change orders and for municipal contracts, we’re starting to see more COVID-specific funds coming into play.

Regardless of these potential roadblocks, logistics and researching manufacturers has become a hallmark of our risk mitigation strategy for our clients and for ourselves. We have essentially become our own in-house logistics company, all in the name of keeping our clients’ projects on track.

In the long-run, it won’t just be Austin thinking this way--supply chain analysis and mastery is going to become a top-of-mind concern for everyone in the industry from owners to trades, as well as a crucial component in getting large-scale projects done on time well into the future.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jason Earnhardt is a Supply Chain Manager for Austin Commercial. Combining a background in finance, analysis and construction, he has revolutionized how our clients look at risk mitigation, logistics and supply chain management.

Related Stories

Building Materials | Jun 12, 2015

Construction materials prices up in May, down year-over-year

Prices for inputs to construction industries rose by 1.1% in May—the largest month-over-month increase in more than two years.

Fire and Life Safety | May 27, 2015

7 bold applications and innovations for fire and life safety

BD+C’s roundup features colorful sprinklers for offices, hotels, museums; a fire-rated curtain wall at a transit hub in Manhattan; a combination CO/smoke detector; and more.

BIM and Information Technology | May 27, 2015

4 projects honored with AIA TAP Innovation Awards for excellence in BIM and project delivery

Morphosis Architects' Emerson College building in Los Angeles and the University of Delaware’s ISE Lab are among the projects honored by AIA for their use of BIM/VDC tools.

Sponsored | Building Materials | May 19, 2015

The BYU Life Sciences Building draws inspiration from tectonic forms

Strong, lightweight ALPOLIC materials honor the rugged Wasatch Mountains while standing up to the forces that created them.

Contractors | Apr 29, 2015

Construction costs are expected to remain soft through fall of 2015

Labor and materials haven’t appreciated this year through April, according to market analyst IHS.

Wood | Apr 26, 2015

Building wood towers: How high is up for timber structures?

The recent push for larger and taller wood structures may seem like an architectural fad. But Building Teams around the world are starting to use more large-scale structural wood systems. 

Sponsored | Building Team | Apr 24, 2015

New Products and Programs to Check Out at the 2015 AIA Convention

There is no bigger annual gathering of architects and design professionals in North America quite like the AIA National Convention.

Building Materials | Apr 15, 2015

Prices for construction materials see highest spike in two years

Results from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that prices for construction materials rose 0.8% in March, the largest monthly increase in more than two years. 

Building Materials | Apr 14, 2015

French firm proposes sand and bacteria as building material in the Sahara

Deserts are already abundant with sand, so why not construct buildings out of it? This was the thought behind Flohara, a collection of shelters developed by Paris-based XTU Architects.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category


Codes and Standards

Updated document details methods of testing fenestration for exterior walls

The Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) updated a document serving a recommended practice for determining test methodology for laboratory and field testing of exterior wall systems. The document pertains to products covered by an AAMA standard such as curtain walls, storefronts, window walls, and sloped glazing. AAMA 501-24, Methods of Test for Exterior Walls was last updated in 2015. 



halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021