TOP 55 UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING FIRMS |
||
| RANK | COMPANY | 2016 UNIVERSITY REVENUE |
| 1 | AECOM | $47,500,000 |
| 2 | Affiliated Engineers | $20,338,000 |
| 3 | Arup | $17,382,483 |
| 4 | WSP | $17,286,000 |
| 5 | IMEG/KJWW/TTG | $16,943,913 |
| 6 | P2S | $16,124,221 |
| 7 | Vanderweil Engineers | $14,748,200 |
| 8 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $13,500,000 |
| 9 | RMF Engineering | $12,000,000 |
| 10 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | $12,000,000 |
| 11 | Thornton Tomasetti | $11,365,463 |
| 12 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner | $8,210,000 |
| 13 | NV5 Global | $7,946,568 |
| 14 | Ross & Baruzzini | $6,580,000 |
| 15 | Shive-Hattery | $6,507,535 |
| 16 | JQ Engineering | $6,294,000 |
| 17 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $6,036,000 |
| 18 | Walker Parking Consultants | $5,726,947 |
| 19 | Jensen Hughes | $5,584,659 |
| 20 | Interface Engineering | $5,362,242 |
| 21 | M/E Engineering | $5,003,126 |
| 22 | Heapy Engineering | $4,967,034 |
| 23 | AKF Group | $4,759,976 |
| 24 | Smith Seckman Reid | $4,204,589 |
| 25 | Burns & McDonnell | $4,164,051 |
| 26 | Walter P Moore | $3,945,857 |
| 27 | CJL Engineering | $3,909,753 |
| 28 | Woolpert | $3,807,991 |
| 29 | H.F. Lenz Co. | $3,773,000 |
| 30 | Glumac | $3,704,343 |
| 31 | ME Engineers | $3,670,000 |
| 32 | RDK Engineers | $3,653,000 |
| 33 | Peter Basso Associates | $3,420,076 |
| 34 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $3,390,000 |
| 35 | STV | $3,348,639 |
| 36 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $3,248,750 |
| 37 | KCI Technologies | $3,000,000 |
| 38 | Karpinski Engineering | $3,000,000 |
| 39 | Spectrum Engineers | $2,985,793 |
| 40 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $2,916,398 |
| 41 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $2,860,000 |
| 42 | Graef | $2,775,671 |
| 43 | Newcomb & Boyd | $2,571,823 |
| 44 | LaBella Associates | $2,359,629 |
| 45 | dbHMS | $2,275,000 |
| 46 | Primera Engineers | $2,146,901 |
| 47 | Henderson Engineers | $2,103,008 |
| 48 | Setty | $2,077,291 |
| 49 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $2,026,981 |
| 50 | Martin/Martin | $2,016,065 |
| 51 | Dunham Associates | $2,000,000 |
| 52 | Kohler Ronan | $1,666,318 |
| 53 | Cardno | $1,530,009 |
| 54 | Syska Hennessy Group | $1,246,055 |
| 55 | Wallace Engineering | $1,200,000 |
| 56 | RLF | $1,101,000 |
| 57 | Tighe & Bond | $1,000,000 |
SEE ALL 2017 GIANTS 300 RANKINGS
Related Stories
Building Team | Mar 8, 2023
Call for Speakers: BD+C’s 2023 Women in Residential + Commercial Construction Conference
The 2023 Women in Residential + Commercial Construction conference event will take place October 25-27 in Nashville, Tenn., and will bring together more than 300 women leaders from all facets of the $1.4 trillion U.S. residential and commercial constructing sector.
Multifamily Housing | Mar 7, 2023
Multifamily housing development in Chicago takes design inspiration from patchwork and quilting
HUB 32, a 65-unit multifamily housing development, will provide affordable housing and community amenities in Chicago’s Garfield Park neighborhood. Brooks + Scarpa’s recently unveiled design takes inspiration from the American tradition of patchwork and quilting.
Industrial Facilities | Mar 6, 2023
The largest planned logistics and business park in North America gets under way in Southern California
The $25 billion World Logistics Center will boost the supply chain capabilities of Southern California and will serve as a distribution center for destinations across the continent.
Adaptive Reuse | Mar 5, 2023
Pittsburgh offers funds for office-to-residential conversions
The City of Pittsburgh’s redevelopment agency is accepting applications for funding from developers on projects to convert office buildings into affordable housing. The city’s goals are to improve downtown vitality, make better use of underutilized and vacant commercial office space, and alleviate a housing shortage.
Student Housing | Mar 5, 2023
Calif. governor Gavin Newsom seeks to reform environmental law used to block student housing
California Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to reform a landmark state environmental law that he says was weaponized by wealthy homeowners to block badly needed housing for students at the University of California, Berkeley.
Green Renovation | Mar 5, 2023
Dept. of Energy offers $22 million for energy efficiency and building electrification upgrades
The Buildings Upgrade Prize (Buildings UP) sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy is offering more than $22 million in cash prizes and technical assistance to teams across America. Prize recipients will be selected based on their ideas to accelerate widespread, equitable energy efficiency and building electrification upgrades.
Windows and Doors | Mar 5, 2023
2022 North American Fenestration Standard released
The 2022 edition of AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440, “North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for windows, doors, and skylights” (NAFS) has been published. The updated 2022 standard replaces the 2017 edition, part of a continued evolution of the standard to improve harmonization across North America, according to a news release.
AEC Innovators | Mar 3, 2023
Meet BD+C's 2023 AEC Innovators
More than ever, AEC firms and their suppliers are wedding innovation with corporate responsibility. How they are addressing climate change usually gets the headlines. But as the following articles in our AEC Innovators package chronicle, companies are attempting to make an impact as well on the integrity of their supply chains, the reduction of construction waste, and answering calls for more affordable housing and homeless shelters. As often as not, these companies are partnering with municipalities and nonprofit interest groups to help guide their production.
Modular Building | Mar 3, 2023
Pallet Shelter is fighting homelessness, one person and modular pod at a time
Everett, Wash.-based Pallet Inc. helped the City of Burlington, Vt., turn a municipal parking lot into an emergency shelter community, complete with 30 modular “sleeping cabins” for the homeless.
Codes | Mar 2, 2023
Biden Administration’s proposed building materials rules increase domestic requirements
The Biden Administration’s proposal on building materials rules used on federal construction and federally funded state and local buildings would significantly boost the made-in-America mandate. In the past, products could qualify as domestically made if at least 55% of the value of their components were from the U.S.
