flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

The pride of Pasadena

The pride of Pasadena

The utmost care and supervision went into a seismic retrofit, restoration, and M/E/P upgrade for the stately rectangular edifice that has served as an icon in the city of Pasadena for eight decades.


By By Barbara Horwitz-Bennett, Contributing Editor | August 11, 2010
This article first appeared in the 200709 issue of BD+C.

As a shining symbol of civic pride in Los Angeles County, Pasadena City Hall stood as the stately centerpiece of Pasadena's Civic Center since 1927. To the casual observer, the rectangular edifice, designed by San Francisco Classicists John Bakewell, Jr., and Arthur Brown, Jr., appeared to be aging gracefully.

However, that placid exterior masked deep cracks within two of the hall's stair towers, extensive water damage, decaying art stone exterior features, and significant seismic defects.

Consequently, seismic strengthening, an M/E/P systems and ADA upgrade, restoration of internal and external areas, and landscaping were the main program elements that the Building Team, headed by the Clark Construction Group, Costa Mesa, Calif., was charged with handling.

Recent studies showed that a future earthquake could destroy portions of the building, so the decision was made to separate the historic structure from the ground through seismic isolation. The original basement floor slab was removed, a new foundation was excavated and installed, a new basement floor transfer system was put in place, and 240 friction-pendulum isolators were installed.

“This was an extremely complicated project,” said BD+C Reconstruction Awards judge K. Nam Shiu, P.E., S.E., MISE, VP, Walker Restoration Consultants, Chicago. “Installing a base isolation system on an existing building is difficult work.”

Interior walls were replaced, the hall's plaster ceilings were restored, and new finishes were applied. All the building's marble, light fixtures, quarry tile, wood doors, and woodwork were preserved, protected, or restored.

On the exterior, historical cast stone elements were refurbished, as well as exterior plaster and copper cladding on the dome and stair towers. The grounds were spruced up with new site paving, landscaping, planters, and decomposed granite walkways.

With such attention dedicated to preserving historic elements, the design and installation of new M/E/P systems had to be carefully woven into the architecture. Systems had to be integrated above existing plaster ceilings, within wainscots, and through existing structural beams in line with specific guidelines in extremely confined spaces. The Building Team had to do a significant amount of coring through concrete and steel to run utility lines; in some cases, soffits were created to conceal M/E/P components.

The Building Team benefited from expertise lent by the City Hall Restoration Oversight Committee, a team of 13 outside professionals appointed by the Pasadena City Council to monitor this important civic project. City of Pasadena officials often attended weekly meetings with subcontractors.

Not only did the design need to be tight, but the actual construction had to be extremely well coordinated, particularly in the basement, where multiple trades had to work together in limited space. Because the basement slab was a honeycomb pattern of holes and structural openings, guardrails and hole covers had to be constantly relocated and replaced during different phases of the project. The team had to exert extreme diligence to prevent any workplace incidents.

This effort paid off. Not only was the work successfully completed two months ahead of schedule, but during more than 541,000 man-hours under difficult work conditions, the project reported zero lost time incidents—an impressive feat when compared to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' 2005 national average rate of 2.6 lost time incidents per project.

Related Stories

Mass Timber | May 3, 2023

Gensler-designed mid-rise will be Houston’s first mass timber commercial office building

A Houston project plans to achieve two firsts: the city’s first mass timber commercial office project, and the state of Texas’s first commercial office building targeting net zero energy operational carbon upon completion next year. Framework @ Block 10 is owned and managed by Hicks Ventures, a Houston-based development company.

AEC Tech | May 1, 2023

Utilizing computer vision, AI technology for visual jobsite tasks

Burns & McDonnell breaks down three ways computer vision can effectively assist workers on the job site, from project progress to safety measures.

Design Innovation Report | Apr 27, 2023

BD+C's 2023 Design Innovation Report

Building Design+Construction’s Design Innovation Report presents projects, spaces, and initiatives—and the AEC professionals behind them—that push the boundaries of building design. This year, we feature four novel projects and one building science innovation.

Building Technology | Apr 24, 2023

Let’s chat about AI: How design and construction firms are using ChatGPT

Tech-savvy AEC firms that already use artificial intelligence to enhance their work view the startling evolution of ChatGPT mostly in a positive light as a potential tool for sharing information and training employees and trade partners. However, the efficacy of ChatGPT is likely to rest on the construction industry’s aggregation of quality data that, until recently, has been underwhelming for getting the greatest bang from AI and machine learning.

Design Innovation Report | Apr 19, 2023

HDR uses artificial intelligence tools to help design a vital health clinic in India

Architects from HDR worked pro bono with iKure, a technology-centric healthcare provider, to build a healthcare clinic in rural India.

3D Printing | Apr 11, 2023

University of Michigan’s DART Laboratory unveils Shell Wall—a concrete wall that’s lightweight and freeform 3D printed 

The University of Michigan’s DART Laboratory has unveiled a new product called Shell Wall—which the organization describes as the first lightweight, freeform 3D printed and structurally reinforced concrete wall. The innovative product leverages DART Laboratory’s research and development on the use of 3D-printing technology to build structures that require less concrete. 

Contractors | Apr 10, 2023

What makes prefabrication work? Factors every construction project should consider

There are many factors requiring careful consideration when determining whether a project is a good fit for prefabrication. JE Dunn’s Brian Burkett breaks down the most important considerations. 

Smart Buildings | Apr 7, 2023

Carnegie Mellon University's research on advanced building sensors provokes heated controversy

A research project to test next-generation building sensors at Carnegie Mellon University provoked intense debate over the privacy implications of widespread deployment of the devices in a new 90,000-sf building. The light-switch-size devices, capable of measuring 12 types of data including motion and sound, were mounted in more than 300 locations throughout the building.

Cladding and Facade Systems | Apr 5, 2023

Façade innovation: University of Stuttgart tests a ‘saturated building skin’ for lessening heat islands

HydroSKIN is a façade made with textiles that stores rainwater and uses it later to cool hot building exteriors. The façade innovation consists of an external, multilayered 3D textile that acts as a water collector and evaporator. 

Project + Process Innovation | Mar 22, 2023

Onsite prefabrication for healthcare construction: It's more than a process, it's a partnership

Prefabrication can help project teams navigate an uncertain market. GBBN's Mickey LeRoy, AIA, ACHA, LEED AP, explains the difference between onsite and offsite prefabrication methods for healthcare construction projects.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021