Through September, spending on nonresidential construction was up 9.2%, to $883.9 billion, according to preliminary estimates by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of the Census. Sectors hard-hit by the coronavirus pandemic—including lodging, retail/commercial, and even office—were showing signs of life.
So it makes sense that a recent polling of 212 architects, engineers, contractors, and developer/owners found nearly three-fifths of respondents—59.4%—rating 2022 an “excellent” or “good” business year. Only 15.6% rated the year “mediocre” or “poor.”
The vast majority of firms, 77.7%, rated their overall health “very good” or “good.” Conversely, only 4.7% saw their firms’ financial condition as either “weak” or “very weak.” Among the firms polled, 55% confirmed their revenue had increased, and another 20.9% said their revenue was level with last year’s. Gains were achieved despite nearly three-quarters of the firms surveyed characterizing the construction/materials market hobbled by supply-chain snags as “intensely” or “very” competitive.
Euphoria, though, might be short-lived, and firms are tempering their prognoses about the future. Nearly one-quarter—23.4%—expect their revenue to be down in 2023, and another 34.4% predict a flat year. Competition ranked third, behind general economic conditions and inflation, as the most important concern AEC firms believe they will face next year. Nearly two-thirds—64%—anticipate that materials prices will continue to rise in 2023. An even higher number, 71.2%, said they were girding for increases in bid prices for projects.
Our poll also found at least one-fifth of firms are concerned about the availability of capital funding for projects, regulations, cashflow management, and keeping their staffs motivated.
When asked about what business development strategies they planned to deploy next year, more than half—53.4%—said they would hire selectively to burnish their firms’ competitiveness, and 47.1% were planning to step up their staff training and education to enhance competitiveness.
Other business strategies these firms are plotting include increasing their marketing and public relations (25.3% of firms polled currently don’t use social media, and among that do LinkedIn is their preferred platform), investing more in technology, and creating new service or business opportunity.
U.S. design and construction firms pick their battles, sector by sector
Our survey asked AEC firms to assess their prospects in 18 construction sectors. Sizable percentages (at least 30%) were hopeful about business for airports, data centers, government/military buildings, healthcare, industrial/warehouse, multifamily and senior living residential, science + technology, and university. At least 20% of respondents saw their prospects as “average” for performing arts centers, hospitality, K-12 education, and sports and recreations. AEC firms placed offices and interior fitouts, religious, and retail/commercial in the “weak” or “very weak” categories.
Here's a closer look at their responses. Keep in mind that these firms aren’t active in every sector, so the numbers providing ratings were smaller than the total in each category. It’s also worth noting that nearly one-third of the AEC firms polled generate between 25% and 74% of their annual business from reconstruction projects:
• Healthcare appears to hold out the greatest opportunities for next year. More than 45% of respondents rated their prospects in this sector as excellent or good. Multifamily received those ratings from 43.1% or AEC firms polled, industrial/warehouse from 39.7%, and data centers from 37.8%.
• Through September, construction spending in the office sector was up only 0.7%, according to Census Bureau estimates. The AEC firms that responded to our survey aren’t anticipating a rebound in this sector any time soon: 41.3% rated their prospects weak or very week. Another 23.5% gave the same ratings to office interiors and fitouts.
Even though Census estimates that the commercial sector (which encompasses retail) was up 22.4% through September, our survey’s respondents are still taking a wait-and-see approach, as 33.3% saw their prospects in retail next year as weak or very weak.
• 29% of respondents said their firms don’t build in the retail sector. And even with the uptick in firms that have expanded their practices and services, only around 10% of our survey’s respondents see mergers or acquisitions in their immediate futures. Our survey reveals an industry whose firms, in many cases, focus on a limited array of typologies and clients, and leave other sectors to specialists.
It was not surprising that 53.2% of respondent firms aren’t building airports and 41.2% aren’t active in the religious sector. Only about half of respondent firms—46.2%—engage performing arts center projects, and 44.3% keep their distances from data centers. But even some of the broader sectors, notably education, find between 30% and 33% of respondent firms absent. Nearly two-fifths aren’t active in science + technology construction, either, and more than two-fifths don’t build in the multifamily sector.
Related Stories
Industry Research | Nov 4, 2016
New survey exposes achievement gap between men and women designers
Female architects still feel disadvantaged when it comes to career advancement.
Market Data | Nov 2, 2016
Nonresidential construction spending down in September, but August data upwardly revised
The government revised the August nonresidential construction spending estimate from $686.6 billion to $696.6 billion.
Industry Research | Nov 1, 2016
Perkins Eastman Research releases white paper on ‘Centers for Healthy Living’ and whole-person wellness
Among the spotlight projects used as case studies for this white paper are C.C. Young, Dallas, Texas; Clark-Lindsey Village, Urbana, Ill.; Moorings Park, Naples, Fla.; NewBridge on the Charles, Dedham, Mass.; Rockwood Retirement Living: The Summit, Spokane, Wash.; Saint John’s on the Lake, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Spring Lake Village, Santa Rosa, Calif.
Market Data | Oct 31, 2016
Nonresidential fixed investment expands again during solid third quarter
The acceleration in real GDP growth was driven by a combination of factors, including an upturn in exports, a smaller decrease in state and local government spending and an upturn in federal government spending, says ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu.
Market Data | Oct 28, 2016
U.S. construction solid and stable in Q3 of 2016; Presidential election seen as influence on industry for 2017
Rider Levett Bucknall’s Third Quarter 2016 USA Construction Cost Report puts the complete spectrum of construction sectors and markets in perspective as it assesses the current state of the industry.
Industry Research | Oct 25, 2016
New HOK/CoreNet Global report explores impact of coworking on corporate real rstate
“Although coworking space makes up less than one percent of the world’s office space, it represents an important workforce trend and highlights the strong desire of today’s employees to have workplace choices, community and flexibility,” says Kay Sargent, Director of WorkPlace at HOK.
Market Data | Oct 24, 2016
New construction starts in 2017 to increase 5% to $713 billion
Dodge Outlook Report predicts moderate growth for most project types – single family housing, commercial and institutional building, and public works, while multifamily housing levels off and electric utilities/gas plants decline.
Industry Research | Oct 20, 2016
New book from HDR explores opportunities for how healthcare organizations can reinvent the patient experience
Delta offers a close look at specific activities and behaviors that can help healthcare providers and caregivers discover revolutionary concepts to help them embrace and thrive in the rapid change that surrounds them.
Designers | Oct 12, 2016
Perkins Eastman and EwingCole co-publish new white paper examining the benefits and challenges of design research
The survey’s findings, combined with input from the EDRA conference, informed the content produced for “Where Are We Now?”
Market Data | Oct 11, 2016
Building design revenue topped $28 billion in 2015
Growing profitability at architecture firms has led to reinvestment and expansion