flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Fire resistive blast and ballistic glass walls in high security facilities

Sponsored Content Glass and Glazing

Fire resistive blast and ballistic glass walls in high security facilities

For federal courthouses, embassies, government facilities and other high profile buildings, building materials are chosen based on their ability to mitigate or minimize the injuries and fatalities to occupants during an attack.


By SaftiFirst | June 20, 2016

Project:  Public Safety Facility in the East Coast
Architect: Skidmore Owings & Merrill
Glazing Contractor: W&W, LLC
Blast Consultant: Weidlinger Associates
Products: Fire Resistive/Blast Rated System with SuperLite II-XL 120 in GPX Blast Framing and Fire Resistive/Ballistic Rated System with SuperLite II-XL 120 in GPX Ballistic Framing.   

 

A building’s design is very much influenced by the function it performs and the perceived threats that it may face – whether it’s from natural disasters, accidents or terrorist attacks – with the latter being a foremost concern for federal courthouses, embassies, government facilities and other high profile buildings.  For these types of facilities, building materials are chosen based on their ability to mitigate or minimize the injuries and fatalities to occupants during an attack. Because of these security concerns, trade-offs have been made when it comes to daylighting, energy efficiency and aesthetics to name a few.  The good news is that today, high-performance security glazing make-ups are available in the market place to meet the level of protection needed while continuing to provide natural light and a feeling of openness.  These specialized systems can also blend with the surroundings seamlessly to enhance the building’s overall design. 

The 1995 bombing of the A.P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City revealed the devastating effects of high velocity glass fragments on people in the building or those in the vicinity when a blast occurs.  This prompted the General Services Administration (GSA) to establish a blast criteria for all glazing used in federal buildings, which was later on adopted by the Interagency Security Committee (ISC) to broaden its use.  Part of its approach is to quantify glass failure not in terms of whether breakage occurs, but rather the hazard it causes to occupants.  Today, the ISC Security Design Criteria Blast Protection Levels for Windows is the most widely recognized classification of design levels for glazing hazard protection:

Performance Condition

Protection Level

Hazard Level

Description of Window Glazing Response

1

Safe

None

Glazing does not break.  No visible damage to glazing or frame.

2

Very High

None

Glazing cracks but is retained by the frame.  Dusting or very small fragments near the sill or floor acceptable.

3a

High

Very Low

Glazing cracks.  Fragments enter space and land on floor no further than 3.3 ft. from the window.

3b

High

Low

Glazing cracks.  Fragments enter space and land on floor no further than 10 ft. from the window.

4

Medium

Medium

Glazing cracks.  Fragments enter space and land on floor and impact a vertical witness panel at a distance of no more than 10 ft. from the window at a height no greater than 2 ft. above the floor.

5

Low

High

Glazing cracks and window system fails catastrophically.  Fragments enter space and land on floor and impact a vertical witness panel at a distance of no more than 10 ft. from the window at a height greater than 2 ft. above the floor.

 

But what happens when the same blast rated glazing system must also meet 2-hour fire resistive requirements, as well as deliver maximum transparency and seamlessly blend with the existing non-rated systems?

Such was the case with a public safety facility located in the east coast of the United States.  The glass wall between the secure entrance and main lobby had to meet both ASTM E-119/NFPA 251 for 2 hours with hose stream as well as Performance Condition 2 of the ISC Security Design Criteria Blast Protection Levels for Windows.  Additionally, the assembly had to meet the requirements in UFC 3-340-02, Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, UFC 4-020-01, Department of Defense Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual and UFC 4-010-01, Department of Defense Minimum Anti-Terrorism Standards for Buildings.  There was also an adjacent glass wall by the security officer’s desk that had to meet ASTM E-119/NFPA 251 for 2 hours and UL 752 Level 4 Ballistic.

Given the strict requirements of this project, SAFTI FIRST submitted a certified blast engineering report to the building team for the fire resistive, blast rated system, as well as provide a visual mock-up of the assembly.  To achieve the level of fire and blast resistance needed, SAFTI FIRST provided SuperLite II-XL 120 with Heat Strengthened Laminated Glass that met the Performance 2 criteria.  It was supplied with the GPX Blast Framing System with a custom designed anchoring system.  SAFTI FIRST worked with the design team and blast consultant to ensure that the entire assembly worked with the surrounding structure to meet the required blast performance.

For the fire and ballistic rated system, SAFTI FIRST provided SuperLite II-XL 120 with Level 4 Ballistic Glazing.  Some of these panels included an obscure spandrel for areas that needed additional privacy.  It was supplied with the GPX Ballistic Framing System to ensure that the entire assembly was compliant. 

 

 

Since maximum transparency and vision were important design requirements, all the SuperLite II-XL fire resistive blast and fire resistive ballistic glazed assemblies utilized Starphire Low-Iron glass for an ultra-clear appearance despite the robust glass make-up.  The GPX Blast and GPX Ballistic Framing systems matched the clean, sharp sightlines and finish of the non-rated systems for a uniform look. Both framing systems were supplied pre-welded and pre-assembled in sections for ease of installation. 

The building also benefited from SuperLite II-XL 120’s large clear view areas, with individual panels just under 4,876 sq. inches, which is SuperLite II-XL 120’s maximum clear view area and the largest available at that time (SAFTI FIRST’s SuperLite II-XLB product currently has a largest clear view area at 7,980 square inches).

SAFTI FIRST also provided the large, 10-foot, 90 minute fire resistive pair doors in the glazed assembly.  They were supplied with custom hardware that was compatible with the specified card reader to ensure secure access to the building. 

The result is a beautiful and elegant glass wall and entrance system that greets building occupants as they enter and leave the facility during work hours, and would protect them from fire, blast or ballistic threats should it occur.

References:

Eve Hinman, P.E. “Blast Safety of the Building Envelope,” Whole Building Design Guide, (October 19, 2011).

Joseph L. Smith, P.S.P. and Nancy A. Renfroe, P.S.P., “Glazing Hazard Mitigation,” Whole Building Design Guide (July 23, 2010).

 

 

Related Stories

Building Materials | Jun 14, 2023

Construction input prices fall 0.6% in May 2023

Construction input prices fell 0.6% in May compared to the previous month, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Producer Price Index data released today. Nonresidential construction input prices declined 0.5% for the month.

Cladding and Facade Systems | Jun 5, 2023

27 important questions about façade leakage

Walter P Moore’s Darek Brandt discusses the key questions building owners and property managers should be asking to determine the health of their building's façade.  

Codes | Mar 2, 2023

Biden Administration’s proposed building materials rules increase domestic requirements

The Biden Administration’s proposal on building materials rules used on federal construction and federally funded state and local buildings would significantly boost the made-in-America mandate. In the past, products could qualify as domestically made if at least 55% of the value of their components were from the U.S. 

AEC Innovators | Feb 28, 2023

Meet the 'urban miner' who is rethinking how we deconstruct and reuse buildings

New Horizon Urban Mining, a demolition firm in the Netherlands, has hitched its business model to construction materials recycling. It's plan: deconstruct buildings and infrastructure and sell the building products for reuse in new construction. New Horizon and its Founder Michel Baars have been named 2023 AEC Innovators by Building Design+Construction editors.

Glass and Glazing | Jan 6, 2023

Vitro Architectural Glass announces new names for three Solarban Glass Products

Vitro Architectural Glass (formerly PPG Glass) announced that it will be renaming three of its signature Solarban® solar control, low-emissivity (low-e) glass products at the beginning of 2023. While the products will have new names, the performance and visual characteristics of all three glasses will remain the same.

Office Buildings | Dec 6, 2022

‘Chicago’s healthiest office tower’ achieves LEED Gold, WELL Platinum, and WiredScore Platinum

Goettsch Partners (GP) recently completed 320 South Canal, billed as “Chicago’s healthiest office tower,” according to the architecture firm. Located across the street from Chicago Union Station and close to major expressways, the 51-story tower totals 1,740,000 sf. It includes a conference center, fitness center, restaurant, to-go market, branch bank, and a cocktail lounge in an adjacent structure, as well as parking for 324 cars/electric vehicles and 114 bicycles.

75 Top Building Products | Nov 30, 2022

75 top building products for 2022

Each year, the Building Design+Construction editorial team evaluates the vast universe of new and updated products, materials, and systems for the U.S. building design and construction market. The best-of-the-best products make up our annual 75 Top Products report. 

Building Materials | Nov 2, 2022

Design for Freedom: Ending slavery and child labor in the global building materials sector

Sharon Prince, Founder and CEO of Grace Farms and Design for Freedom, discusses DFF's report on slavery and enforced child labor in building products and materials.

Building Materials | Aug 3, 2022

Shawmut CEO Les Hiscoe on coping with a shaky supply chain in construction

BD+C's John Caulfield interviews Les Hiscoe, CEO of Shawmut Design and Construction, about how his firm keeps projects on schedule and budget in the face of shortages, delays, and price volatility.

Building Materials | Jun 20, 2022

Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain

Austin Commercial’s Jason Earnhardt explains why supply chain issues for the construction industry are not going to go away and how developers and owners can get ahead of project roadblocks.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021