flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Buckling restrained braced frame debuts in the Northeast, at Bronx health center

Building Tech

Buckling restrained braced frame debuts in the Northeast, at Bronx health center

Faced with building a mid-rise structure on a site with poor soil conditions, a structural engineering team turns to a West Coast favorite—BRBF technology—for a steadying influence.


By David Barista, Editorial Director | March 1, 2016
Buckling restrained braced frame debuts in the Northeast at Bronx health center

Rendering and photos courtesy STV

The buckling restrained braced frame system was introduced to  the U.S. construction market in 1999 as a solution for meeting hardened building codes following the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Since then, BRBF has been used to stabilize hundreds of buildings along the West Coast, especially in earthquake-prone California.

As seismic codes play a larger role in building projects east of the Sierras, Building Teams across the country are turning to seismic design solutions like BRBF that were perfected in the West to meet increasingly stringent code requirements. 

The latest example is the five-story, 179,000-sf Adult Behavioral Health Center, recently completed as part of the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York’s rebuilding of the Bronx Psychiatric Center campus, on behalf of the New York State Office of Mental Health.

Unlike many large-scale New York City structures built on solid rock foundations, the 156-bed Bronx healthcare facility is situated on wetlands that had been filled in with four million cubic yards of material generated from the construction of the Cross Bronx Expressway from 1948 to 1972. The poor soil conditions resulted in a Site Class F categorization and a Seismic Design Category D for the site. It called for an expanded geotechnical investigation and assessment, as well as seismic mitigation measures that were recently implemented under the New York State Building Code.

 

Situated on wetlands, the five-story, 179,000-sf Adult Behavioral Health Center in the Bronx, N.Y., required special seismic mitigation measures. Buckling restrained braces were the most economical, efficient solution.

 

The structural design team, led by STV, first considered a traditional concentric braced frame lateral system. The solution met seismic requirements, but posed space-planning concerns for the client. Its relatively sizable structural elements and supporting walls would have bumped up against the health center’s programmatic requirements for rooms and circulation and would have jeopardized the architect’s open, airy indoor design scheme.

The final design approach, developed in conjunction with engineers in STV’s Los Angeles office, called for a BRBF system—a first for the Northeast—to enhance the structural performance of the building and greatly reduce steel frame member sizes. It also minimized the number of supporting walls needed for the project, and saved approximately $500,000 in material costs, according to Chris Cerino, PE, SECB, VP and Director of Structural Engineering, Building & Facilities Division, with STV. The firm also served as the design architect and electrical, civil, geotechnical, and telecom engineer on the project.

With the BRBF approach, certain braced frame steel columns could be downsized from W14x426 to W14x342, and select braced frame steel beams were reduced from W36x150 to W24x68.

“Smaller frame members gave STV designers flexibility in considering the movement of staff, residents, and food and building services,” says Cerino. “It also improved sightlines in all staff and resident areas to reduce the dependency on electronic monitoring.”

Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) vary slightly based on the manufacturer, but all BRBs include five basic components: a steel-plate core shaped like a kayak paddle (1) is placed within a hollow steel tube (2) that is coated with a low-friction material (3), which is then grouted in place (4) and capped (5). The grouted steel tube design prevents the steel core from buckling when in compression, while the coating prevents axial load from being transferred to the encasement.

The result is a “full, balanced response in relation to the forces being applied,” says Cerino. “Because the steel core is restrained, it develops nearly uniform axial strains across the section, resulting in efficient energy dissipation.”

This balanced energy dissipation, in turn, permits design teams to use much smaller beam sizes than with a standard braced frame.

On the Adult Behavioral Health Center project, Cerino’s team specified a proprietary system manufactured by Star Seismic. According to Cerino, Star’s Wildcat BRB system, which features single-pin connections, reduced erection time because it eliminated the need for stiffener plates. “Its patented collar reduces welding, since simple fillets can be used,” says Cerino. “That factored into the overall monetary savings.”

Cerino offers a few tips for Building Teams evaluating BRBFs:

  • Watch out for the added special seismic requirements and details that become triggered when using a high-performance seismic system. “Not that a BRBF has different triggers than a special concentrically braced frame system, but since much of the design is deferred to the specialty brace contractor, some of the details can become out of sight, out of mind,” he says.
  • Decide on the system early so you can address any client/procurement obstacles. “If it becomes too late, it can simply be easier to do nothing,” says Cerino. “That doesn’t help the project.”

 

Buckling restrained braces include several basic components: a steel-plate core is placed within a hollow steel tube that is coated with a low-friction material and then grouted in place and capped. The grouted steel tube design prevents the steel core from buckling when in compression, while the coating prevents axial load from being transferred to the encasement.

Related Stories

Multifamily Housing | Jul 23, 2019

Is prefab in your future?

The most important benefit of offsite construction, when done right, is reliability.

Building Tech | Jun 26, 2019

Modular construction can deliver projects 50% faster

Modular construction can deliver projects 20% to 50% faster than traditional methods and drastically reshape how buildings are delivered, according to a new report from McKinsey & Co.

Building Tech | Apr 19, 2019

Skender, Z Modular reach agreement to fabricate multifamily housing components

Factory to open soon on the southwest side of Chicago.

Building Tech | Apr 8, 2019

Factory-based construction with no siloes starts with a single source of truth

Working from a single source of truth means every factor of design, procurement, manufacturing, and assembly will be accounted for before the assembly line is turned on.

Building Tech | Mar 19, 2019

Digital twin startup aims to map the planet's metros

The Smart World suite of 5D software platforms map and visualize data provided by metropolises to an intuitive real-time 3D simulation.

Digital Twin | Mar 15, 2019

Digital twin applications: 7 steps to a better-managed jobsite

Automated progress monitoring and optimizing equipment usage are among the potential applications for digital twin technology on construction jobsites.

Digital Twin | Mar 15, 2019

The Gemini Factor: Digital twin tech enters the AEC market

AEC firms explore how digital twin technology can bring more consistency to the design process and construction site.

Building Tech | Mar 13, 2019

Almost everything you wanted to know about industrial construction

Our experts offer 15 tips on how best to perform factory-based construction.

Building Tech | Feb 18, 2019

Investing — and building — smarter

Edge Technologies has entered into alliances with the International WELL Building Institute and wellness-focused real estate developer Delos.

Building Tech | Feb 14, 2019

The epic rise of industrialized construction

Experts project that prefabrication and modular construction will total $209 billion by the end of the decade.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

Codes and Standards

Updated document details methods of testing fenestration for exterior walls

The Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) updated a document serving a recommended practice for determining test methodology for laboratory and field testing of exterior wall systems. The document pertains to products covered by an AAMA standard such as curtain walls, storefronts, window walls, and sloped glazing. AAMA 501-24, Methods of Test for Exterior Walls was last updated in 2015. 




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021