TOP 60 ENGINEERING FIRMS |
||
| RANK | COMPANY | 2016 ENG REVENUE |
| 1 | Fluor | $234,310,000 |
| 2 | Arup | $195,699,769 |
| 3 | Jensen Hughes | $141,099,912 |
| 4 | Affiliated Engineers | $132,645,000 |
| 5 | IMEG/KJWW/TTG | $128,424,451 |
| 6 | Syska Hennessy Group | $97,853,317 |
| 7 | Henderson Engineers | $90,258,566 |
| 8 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $89,800,000 |
| 9 | Vanderweil Engineers | $88,601,000 |
| 10 | Walter P Moore | $87,954,593 |
| 11 | AKF Group | $61,642,379 |
| 12 | Smith Seckman Reid | $59,806,672 |
| 13 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $56,695,851 |
| 14 | Environmental Systems Design | $55,786,313 |
| 15 | ME Engineers | $52,970,000 |
| 16 | Glumac | $52,213,213 |
| 17 | RMF Engineering | $48,876,000 |
| 18 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | $45,524,528 |
| 19 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $45,332,976 |
| 20 | Mazzetti | $43,500,000 |
| 21 | Interface Engineering | $41,612,415 |
| 22 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $39,449,000 |
| 23 | Coffman Engineers | $39,031,285 |
| 24 | RDK Engineers | $35,086,000 |
| 25 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $31,800,000 |
| 26 | Heapy Engineering | $29,168,674 |
| 27 | P2S | $29,148,150 |
| 28 | M/E Engineering | $25,015,630 |
| 29 | Martin/Martin | $24,111,288 |
| 30 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $23,000,000 |
| 31 | H.F. Lenz Co. | $22,220,000 |
| 32 | Newcomb & Boyd | $22,143,871 |
| 33 | Dunham Associates | $20,000,000 |
| 34 | CJL Engineering | $19,223,299 |
| 35 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $17,962,340 |
| 36 | ThermalTech Engineering | $17,000,000 |
| 37 | Spectrum Engineers | $16,979,965 |
| 38 | KLH Engineers | $16,214,207 |
| 39 | Karpinski Engineering | $15,896,000 |
| 40 | Wallace Engineering | $15,600,000 |
| 41 | GHT Ltd. | $15,264,091 |
| 42 | Setty | $14,730,217 |
| 43 | Peter Basso Associates | $14,382,322 |
| 44 | kW Mission Critical Engineering | $13,700,000 |
| 45 | JQ Engineering | $13,190,000 |
| 46 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $11,388,750 |
| 47 | Allen & Shariff | $11,052,241 |
| 48 | CTLGroup | $10,600,000 |
| 49 | Kohler Ronan | $10,559,521 |
| 50 | dbHMS | $9,100,000 |
| 51 | Rock Brook Consulting Group, The | $9,000,000 |
| 52 | Wick Fisher White | $8,722,000 |
| 53 | Zak Companies | $8,654,355 |
| 54 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $7,373,000 |
| 55 | Infrastructure Factor Consulting | $6,625,000 |
| 56 | Kamm Consulting | $6,137,678 |
| 57 | Tighe & Bond | $5,100,000 |
| 58 | G & W Engineering | $4,680,291 |
| 59 | Architectural Engineers | $3,892,565 |
| 60 | KCL Engineering | $3,307,243 |
SEE ALL 2017 GIANTS 300 RANKINGS
Related Stories
Mixed-Use | Jun 6, 2023
Public-private partnerships crucial to central business district revitalization
Central Business Districts are under pressure to keep themselves relevant as they face competition from new, vibrant mixed-use neighborhoods emerging across the world’s largest cities.
Multifamily Housing | Jun 6, 2023
Minnesota expected to adopt building code that would cut energy use by 80%
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is expected to soon sign a bill that would change the state’s commercial building code so that new structures would use 80% less energy when compared to a 2004 baseline standard. The legislation aims for full implementation of the new code by 2036.
Healthcare Facilities | Jun 5, 2023
Modernizing mental health care in emergency departments: Improving patient outcomes
In today’s mental health crisis, there is a widespread shortage of beds to handle certain populations. Patients may languish in the ED for hours or days before they can be linked to an appropriate inpatient program.
Student Housing | Jun 5, 2023
The power of student engagement: How on-campus student housing can increase enrollment
Studies have confirmed that students are more likely to graduate when they live on campus, particularly when the on-campus experience encourages student learning and engagement, writes Design Collaborative's Nathan Woods, AIA.
Engineers | Jun 5, 2023
How to properly assess structural wind damage
Properly assessing wind damage can identify vulnerabilities in a building's design or construction, which could lead to future damage or loss, writes Matt Wagner, SE, Principal and Managing Director with Walter P Moore.
Energy-Efficient Design | Jun 5, 2023
Implementing an ‘asset drawdown strategy’ for site decarbonization
Solidifying a decarbonization plan via an “asset drawdown strategy” that carefully considers both capital and operating costs represents a game-changing opportunity for existing properties to compete with new projects.
Cladding and Facade Systems | Jun 5, 2023
27 important questions about façade leakage
Walter P Moore’s Darek Brandt discusses the key questions building owners and property managers should be asking to determine the health of their building's façade.
Retail Centers | Jun 2, 2023
David Adjaye-designed mass timber structure will be a business incubator for D.C.-area entrepreneurs
Construction was recently completed on The Retail Village at Sycamore & Oak, a 22,000-sf building that will serve as a business incubator for entrepreneurs, including emerging black businesses, in Washington, D.C. The facility, designed by Sir David Adjaye, the architect of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, is expected to attract retail and food concepts that originated in the community.
Mixed-Use | Jun 1, 2023
The Moore Building, a 16-story office and retail development, opens in Nashville’s Music Row district
Named after Elvis Presley’s onetime guitarist, The Moore Building, a 16-story office building with ground-floor retail space, has opened in Nashville’s Music Row district. Developed by Portman and Creed Investment Company and designed by Gresham Smith, The Moore Building offers 236,000 sf of office space and 8,500 sf of ground-floor retail.
Healthcare Facilities | Jun 1, 2023
High-rise cancer center delivers new model for oncology care
Atlanta’s 17-story Winship Cancer Institute at Emory Midtown features two-story communities that organize cancer care into one-stop destinations. Designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) and May Architecture, the facility includes comprehensive oncology facilities—including inpatient beds, surgical capacity, infusion treatment, outpatient clinics, diagnostic imaging, linear accelerators, and areas for wellness, rehabilitation, and clinical research.
