flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Process leads to new design values for southern pine and other visually graded dimension lumber

Process leads to new design values for southern pine and other visually graded dimension lumber


By BD+C Staff | October 20, 2011
A summary of the process used to develop new design values will clarify many of the questions received by the SFPA.

The Southern Forest Products Association (SFPA) does not test lumber or establish design values. SFPA markets lumber products and helps users understand Southern Pine grading rules and design values. “Our objective is to provide information helpful to our member producers and their customers,” said SFPA president Adrian Blocker. “We feel a summary of the process used to develop new design values will clarify many of the questions we have received.”

Design values for structural lumber go through a rigorous, step-by-step process, including development by the appropriate rules-writing agency (such as the Southern Pine Inspection Bureau (SPIB) for Southern Pine), approval by the American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC) Board of Review, and adoption into the building codes by the International Codes Council.

  1. ALSC provides the basis for design value acceptance. ALSC serves as the standing committee for the American Softwood Lumber Standard, Voluntary Product Standard PS 20, developed in accordance with U.S. Department of Commerce procedures. ALSC administers the American Lumber Standard system which provides the basis for acceptance of lumber and design values for lumber by the building codes throughout the U.S. The last major change for visually graded dimension lumber occurred in 1991 when design values for Southern Pine and other North American species were published based on In-Grade testing of full-size samples of commercially produced lumber.
  2. The resource is monitored by rules-writing agencies. Since 1994, the Southern Pine Inspection Bureau (SPIB) has conducted an annual resource monitoring program developed in collaboration with the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory (FPL).
  3. Possible resource changes are detected. During 17 years of resource monitoring by SPIB, the level established to trigger additional testing was never reached. However, overall trends in the annual test data suggested a possible shift in the raw material resource or product mix. These trends, along with anecdotal external information, prompted SPIB to conduct an enhanced testing program.
  4. Sampling and testing plans are approved by the ALSC Board of Review. SPIB’s Special Procedures for Monitoring Southern Pine Design Values plan was approved on November 18, 2010.
  5. Testing and data analysis is conducted by rules-writing agencies. SPIB partnered with Timber Products Inspection to sample No.2 2x4 test specimens according to the approved plan. SPIB and Timber Products conducted destructive tests in bending and tension, plus gathered stiffness and property data, all in accordance with ASTM International standards. SPIB performed the data analysis, also in conformance with ASTM standards. The SPIB Board of Governors studied the results and considered all options, including the possibility of modifying SPIB’s Standard Grading Rules for Southern Pine Lumber to cull out the lowest strength pieces. The conclusion reached was that the test results did not support such a grading rule change. Instead, the SPIB Board of Governors concluded the appropriate outcome was to propose new design values for all grades and sizes of visually graded Southern Pine dimension lumber. Moving forward, the SPIB Board of Governors committed to the completion of the full In-Grade testing matrix by testing Select Structural 2x4s, No.2 and Select Structural 2x8s, and No.2 and Select Structural 2x10s. SPIB and Timber Products will conduct destructive tests in bending, tension and compression, plus gather stiffness and property data. Testing is scheduled to be completed by Spring 2012. 
  6. Proposed new design values are submitted to the ALSC Board of Review by rules-writing agencies. SPIB was the first agency to submit proposed new design values. The National Lumber Grading Authority has submitted its monitoring data. All other rules-writing agencies are immediately undertaking evaluation of their resources and have submitted sampling and testing plans for their species to the ALSC Board of Review.
  7. Technical review is performed by the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory at the request of the ALSC Board of Review.
  8. New design values are approved by the ALSC Board of Review. The ALSC Board of Review will review information involving design values for all species at its next meeting, scheduled for October 20, 2011. New design values for Southern Pine could be approved at that meeting. Or, the ALSC Board of Review may decide additional information, such as the results from SPIB’s full In-Grade matrix testing, is needed before granting final approval.
  9. New design values are published by rules-writing agencies. SPIB will publish new design values for visually graded Southern Pine dimension lumber upon approval by the ALSC Board of Review.
  10. New design values are incorporated into the building codes by reference through the National Design Specification® (NDS®). The American Wood Council (AWC) will update the NDS Design Value Supplement, a compendium of approved lumber design values published by rules-writing agencies. In addition, AWC will update the Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM) which references the NDS supplement for development of prescriptive designs. AWC will submit new span and application tables to the International Codes Council, as well as propose other code and standard changes needed to incorporate new design values into the building codes.

State and local code jurisdictions determine adoption and enforcement timelines. Rules-writing agencies are responsible for making new design values publically available upon approval by the ALSC Board of Review. SFPA and AWC will assist by providing the new information to the design, specification, user, and enforcement communities. It is then the responsibility of building code jurisdictions to determine how and when to begin enforcement.

“SFPA is the marketing organization that communicates new design value information with key customer groups and allied industry organizations,” said Blocker. “Many in the construction industry, including SFPA, support an orderly and logical transition for achieving a timely changeover to new design values while avoiding project stoppages or delays. BD+C

Related Stories

| Aug 11, 2010

ZweigWhite names its fastest-growing architecture, engineering, and environmental firms

Management consulting and research firm ZweigWhite has identified the 200 fastest-growing architecture, engineering, and environmental consulting firms in the U.S. and Canada for its annual ranking, The Zweig Letter Hot Firm List. This annual list features the design and environmental firms that have outperformed the economy and competitors to become industry leaders.

| Aug 11, 2010

SSOE, Fluor among nation's largest industrial building design firms

A ranking of the Top 75 Industrial Design Firms based on Building Design+Construction's 2009 Giants 300 survey. For more Giants 300 rankings, visit http://www.BDCnetwork.com/Giants

| Aug 11, 2010

Guggenheim to host live online discussion of Frank Lloyd Wright exhibition

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum launches the Guggenheim Forum, a new series of moderated online discussions among experts from a variety of fields that will occur in conjunction with major museum exhibitions.

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

| Aug 11, 2010

Report: Building codes and regulations impede progress toward uber-green buildings

The enthusiasm for super green Living Buildings continues unabated, but a key stumbling block to the growth of this highest level of green building performance is an existing set of codes and regulations. A new report by the Cascadia Region Green Building Council entitled "Code, Regulatory and Systemic Barriers Affecting Living Building Projects" presents a case for fundamental reassessment of building codes.

| Aug 11, 2010

Call for entries: Building enclosure design awards

The Boston Society of Architects and the Boston chapter of the Building Enclosure Council (BEC-Boston) have announced a High Performance Building award that will assess building enclosure innovation through the demonstrated design, construction, and operation of the building enclosure.

| Aug 11, 2010

Portland Cement Association offers blast resistant design guide for reinforced concrete structures

Developed for designers and engineers, "Blast Resistant Design Guide for Reinforced Concrete Structures" provides a practical treatment of the design of cast-in-place reinforced concrete structures to resist the effects of blast loads.  It explains the principles of blast-resistant design, and how to determine the kind and degree of resistance a structure needs as well as how to specify the required materials and details.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

Mass Timber

Mass timber a big part of Western Washington University’s net-zero ambitions

Western Washington University, in Bellingham, Wash., 90 miles from Seattle, is in the process of expanding its ABET-accredited programs for electrical engineering, computer engineering and science, and energy science. As part of that process, the university is building Kaiser Borsari Hall, the 54,000-sf new home for those academic disciplines that will include teaching labs, research labs, classrooms, collaborative spaces, and administrative offices.




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021