In November 2021, New York City enacted Local Law 126 of 2021, which is well-known in the building industry for establishing new requirements for periodic parking garage inspections. At the same time, the legislation added a section to the NYC Administrative Code mandating periodic observation of building parapets.
To allow owners time to prepare, the City set the start date for the new parapet observations for January 1, 2024.
What is required?
All buildings in New York City with parapets facing a street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way must undergo a professional parapet observation every year.
Unlike the Facade Inspection Safety Program (FISP), which excludes buildings under six stories, the parapet rule applies to all buildings, regardless of height, with the exception of detached single- or two-family homes. While FISP inspections are conducted on a five-year cycle, and parking garage inspections are required at least every six years, the newly mandated parapet observation must be done annually.
The good news: owners do not need to file the observation report with the Department of Buildings (DOB). Whereas facade and garage inspection reports follow prescriptive formats and must be electronically submitted, parapet reports need only be kept on file by the building owner. Archives of at least six years of parapet reports must be made available should the DOB request them.
What happens if there is a hazardous condition?
Immediately upon observing an unsafe condition, the professional performing the observation is required to notify the DOB. The building owner must promptly install public protection, such as sidewalk sheds, fences, and/or safety netting, which must remain in place until the problem is remedied. Unsafe conditions must be corrected within 90 days.
What is included in the observation report?
In contrast to the FISP and parking garage laws, the new parapet rule is not prescriptive as to report sections and format. However, the report does need to include:
- Basic building information, including address and owner contact details;
- Name and contact details for the professional performing the observation;
- Date of the observation;
- Location plan and construction information for the parapets, including material, height, and thickness;
- Description of general conditions;
- Unsafe conditions and actions taken to remedy them;
- Repairs since the previous report; and
- Dated photos documenting conditions.
Rather than filing the report with the DOB, the owner retains parapet observation reports for at least six years and must be prepared to furnish them to the DOB upon request.
What steps should owners take now?
With the requirements set to begin on the first of the year, owners have just a few months to plan. If a mandated FISP inspection is scheduled for 2024, adding a separate parapet observation report to that program may be a cost-effective strategy. Similarly, parapet observation can be incorporated into other planned exterior work, such as roof rehabilitation or facade cleaning.
A design professional can offer guidance on the simplest and most budget-conscious way to meet the new annual parapet requirements as part of existing maintenance and repair programs.
Resources
RCNY §103-15: Periodic Observation of Building Parapets
Local Law 126 of 2021 – see §28-301.1.1, p. 168
“Design Guide for Parapets: Safety, Continuity, and the Building Code,” Hoffmann Architects + Engineers JOURNAL
Hoffmann Architects + Engineers specializes in the rehabilitation of building exteriors.
Our design professionals have worked with hundreds of New York City building owners to meet inspection and repair requirements since the first facade law in 1980. We provide up-to-date guidance to help owners comply with the code and safely maintain their properties. Reach us at 212-789-9915 or hoffarch.com/contact.
Related Stories
| Oct 13, 2011
New Law: California Building Standards Commission Must Include Green Expert
A new California law, AB 930, requires that one member of the California Building Standards Commission be “experienced and knowledgeable in sustainable building, design, construction, and operation.”
| Oct 13, 2011
AGC Urges Repeal of 3% Withholding On Government Contracts
The U.S. House of Representatives is planning a vote in October on a bill to repeal the 3% withholding requirement on all federal and state contracts for goods and services.
| Oct 13, 2011
House Bill Would Block New OSHA Regulations
Proposed riders in a U.S. House of Representatives spending bill would block the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) from issuing controversial workplace safety and health regulations.
| Oct 11, 2011
AIA introduces five new documents for use on sustainable projects
These new documents will be available in the first quarter of 2012 as part of the new AIA Contract Documents service and AIA Documents on Demand.
| Oct 7, 2011
GREENBUILD 2011: UL Environment releases industry-wide sustainability requirements for doors
ASSA ABLOY Trio-E door is the first to be certified to these sustainability requirements.
| Oct 6, 2011
Taking tenant behavior into account on building energy codes
Over the past few years, Seattle, San Francisco, Austin, and Washington, D.C., have passed laws requiring property owners to measure and disclose their energy use, which would help place a market value on a building’s efficiency and provide a benchmark for improvements.
| Oct 6, 2011
Constructed properly, green roofs hold up well in a hurricane
The heavy rains and high winds of Hurricane Irene didn’t cause any problems for a Con Edison green roof in New York City. The roof contains sedum, a plant that adapts well to drought and handles periods of heavy rain well.
| Oct 6, 2011
RoofPoint: A new green standard for roofs
Structured much like other rating systems, RoofPoint, establishes green standards specifically for roofs.
| Oct 6, 2011
Roofers critical of new OSHA harness rules
Roofers say a new OSHA rule requiring all residential roofers to wear a safety harness makes workers less safe, and is causing lost business for those who comply with the rule.
| Oct 6, 2011
Florida county proposes saving on construction costs by trumping city regulations
This summer, Pinellas County, FL wanted to save money on an $81 million public safety complex in Largo by using the county’s own building regulations and permit fees, not the city’s more expensive fees.