flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

'Core-first' construction technique cuts costs, saves time on NYC high-rise project

'Core-first' construction technique cuts costs, saves time on NYC high-rise project

Process involves pouring concrete core prior to erecting steel frame


By Richard Wood, CEO and President, Plaza Construction | December 27, 2014
Photo: Justin A. Wilcox via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: Justin A. Wilcox via Wikimedia Commons

When Plaza Construction first introduced the concept of "core first" in managing the construction of a major office building, the procedure of pouring concrete prior to erecting a steel frame had never been done in New York City. The precedent-setting development was utilized to build Eleven Times Square, a 40-story, 1.1 million-sf office building in New York City, resulting in a tremendous savings, completion a couple of months ahead of schedule and with no major accidents.  

It was designed according to LEED Gold specifications, and its owner, SJP Properties, claims that it is one of the safest and most efficient buildings in the world. Needless to say, this method is now considered standard in the building industry, but Eleven Times Square was the first in this market.

The concrete-first method had long been used in other markets and throughout Europe, but there was strong resistance to it by New York’s laborers, mainly because of safety concerns. The developers were able to get the labor unions to buy into the technique through proving that a safe worksite will be maintained—and by all reports—Eleven Times Square changed a lot of minds. 

Eleven Times Square’s architectural features include floor plates that expand as the building rises, as well as six tenant-exclusive terraces on the tower. Seven column-free corner offices are available on every tower floor, with panoramic views of the Hudson River, Times Square, and the Empire State Building. The base floors are 41,000 sf each.

How do you build a concrete core ahead of-and completely independent of-the structural steel frame? Why is it advantageous to do so? According to Richard Wood, President and CEO of Plaza Construction, “it’s done by erecting a self-climbing form-a gigantic mold, in effect-on top of footings, with reinforced steel placed inside it.  Concrete is poured into the form, and when it’s dried, hydraulics lift the form up to a new point, and the process is repeated.”

 

 

“Within the concrete,” Wood explains, “flush to the face of the form, are flat plates of steel with sheer tabs welded onto them, from the trailing platform after the form climbs, and bolt-holes creating the attachment for the beams that will follow.  The trailing platforms are part and parcel of the structure of the forming system.  As the system is hydraulically lifted, the platforms go along with them so they’re constantly climbing the building.”

At Eleven Times Square, the foundation contractor, Urban Foundation/Engineering, got started on the concrete core before the foundation was completed and while the steel was still in fabrication.  Also involved were Sorbara Concrete, Cives Steel and Cornell Erectors. During this process, the steel framing followed as soon as the bottom of the climbing forms cleared the embedding.  This tightly organized system allowed completion of the core in the shortest possible time.

“This system is advantageous because these forming systems allow you to better control the quality of concrete and the schedule of the pours are not dependent on other work,” Wood explains.  “This concrete core is in essence a building unto itself, a well-protected and secure core area that serves multiple purposes. It creates the lateral stability of the structure and a safe zone, after occupancy, and provides for safe egress.”

The core encloses all the building’s critical elements, including extra-wide stairways, elevators, utility risers, and the building’s command center.  Mechanical, electrical, and telecommunications rooms for each floor are fully enclosed within the core walls, which results in greater security and reduced noise.

Eleven Times Square was particularly suited to the core-first option and SJP Properties chose this method based on the configuration of the core: a straight–up configuration that was especially receptive to the self-climbing, forming system. PERI, a manufacturer that has subsidiaries in more than 50 countries, provided the climbing forms.

“The forms were customized for specific projects,” Wood concludes.  “The forming system is not just the form itself, but the platform that the trades work from, plus storage for materials that are introduced into the sheer wall as it climbs vertically.  The system creates a self-contained secure area.”

The concrete core was made of locally sourced material, and most of the reinforcing steel was recycled-thus boosting the building’s LEED rating considerably.

According to SJP, the unions, site safety experts, and subcontractors worked together to develop a comprehensive safety plan.  Egress was a major issue, which was addressed via a dedicated hoist for the core construction and a temporary stair hanging from the formwork, which accessed multiple levels at any given time, giving direct access to the permanent stairs-which were installed immediately to the underside of the form system at each jump.  Plaza also employed two full-time safety managers to simultaneously monitor the core and steel construction, and implemented a safety reward program for the trades.

The result is a core-first system that allows for cost-savings, speed and safety because the concrete is erected in an encased cocoon.

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Feb 8, 2024

Top 10 Telecommunications Building Architecture Firms for 2023

Arcadis North America, CSArch, Interior Architects, and TETER top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest telecommunications building architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Feb 8, 2024

Top 50 Public Library Architecture Firms for 2023

Quinn Evans, McMillan Pazdan Smith, PGAL, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, and Gensler top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest public library architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Feb 8, 2024

Top 60 Performing Arts Center and Concert Venue Architecture Firms for 2023

Populous, DLR Group, Gensler, HGA, and Perkins Eastman top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest performing arts center and concert venue architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.  

Giants 400 | Feb 8, 2024

Top 70 Museum Architecture Firms for 2023

SmithGroup, Gensler, Ayers Saint Gross, Quinn Evans, HGA, and Cooper Robertson head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest museum and gallery architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.  

Architects | Feb 8, 2024

LPA President Dan Heinfeld announced retirement

LPA Design Studios announced the upcoming retirement of longtime president Dan Heinfeld, who led the firm’s growth from a small, commercial development-focused architecture studio into a nation-leading integrated design practice setting new standards for performance and design excellence.

Market Data | Feb 7, 2024

New download: BD+C's February 2024 Market Intelligence Report

Building Design+Construction's monthly Market Intelligence Report offers a snapshot of the health of the U.S. building construction industry, including the commercial, multifamily, institutional, and industrial building sectors. This report tracks the latest metrics related to construction spending, demand for design services, contractor backlogs, and material price trends.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2024

Top 80 Religious Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

Parkhill, FGM Architects, GFF, Gensler, and HOK top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest religious facility architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Modular Building | Feb 6, 2024

Modular fire station allows for possible future reconfigurations

A fire station in Southern California leveraged prefab, modular construction for faster completion and future reconfiguration.

Giants 400 | Feb 5, 2024

Top 30 Entertainment Center, Cineplex, and Theme Park Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, JLL, Nelson Worldwide, AO, and Stantec top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest entertainment center, cineplex, and theme park architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Urban Planning | Feb 5, 2024

Lessons learned from 70 years of building cities

As Sasaki looks back on 70 years of practice, we’re also looking to the future of cities. While we can’t predict what will be, we do know the needs of cities are as diverse as their scale, climate, economy, governance, and culture.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

Construction Costs

New download: BD+C's May 2024 Market Intelligence Report

Building Design+Construction's monthly Market Intelligence Report offers a snapshot of the health of the U.S. building construction industry, including the commercial, multifamily, institutional, and industrial building sectors. This report tracks the latest metrics related to construction spending, demand for design services, contractor backlogs, and material price trends.




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021