Healthcare consumers are just as likely to factor in convenience as they do cost when deciding where to seek care and from whom, according to a new survey of 4,037 American adults about their attitudes and preferences as patients.
The survey, conducted from April 19-28 by JLL, in many ways confirms the obvious: that older generations seek preventive care more often than younger generations; that insurance coverage is a primary driver for choosing a provider or hospital; and that the quality of service affects the patient experience.
Nearly eight of 10 of the survey’s respondents had received at least one type of non-dental care in the last year. Women, who accounted for 51% of the survey’s respondents, are more likely to receive care overall, but men are more likely to receive emergency care.
The likelihood of a primary care or specialist visit increases with age: 80% of adults 65 years or older have two or more chronic conditions that require continuous care. More than 70% of Baby Boomers (who accounted for 29% of the survey’s respondents) had received primary or preventive care within the last year, compared to only 26% of Generation Z.
Younger generations are more reactive than preventive in their healthcare decisions, borne out by the survey’s finding that Millennials and Gen Zs (43% of the survey's respondents) are more likely to receive urgent care, emergency care, and outpatient behavioral healthcare than older adults.
Proximity to patients counts
When care is urgently needed, “decision factors are simplified,” the survey states, and location and proximity of care are ranked higher as decision-making factors. But even outside of emergencies, convenience ranks high among factors for patients seeking care.
There’s no denying that cost is always in the background of any healthcare decision. “Accept my insurance” was the most common factor for choosing a provider among the survey’s respondents. (82% of participants has private insurance, and 81% has public insurance.)
Two-fifths of respondents said they travel less than 15 minutes to receive care, and nearly eight of 10 respondents travel less than 30 minutes. Among those with appointments in standalone medical offices, 85% ranked location as convenience, which the survey suggested indicates the advantages of a dispersed location strategy.
“A strong location strategy can improve reach for health systems and physician practices and potentially improve care outcomes,” JLL writes. “But there is a balance between convenience and cost—health systems need to balance the benefits of being close to their target population with the cost of a new facility or doctors’ time in transit from a local clinic to the hospital.”
Convenience is also key both in location and in being able to navigate to care. Patients want to get to care quickly and get on with their day. Ease of parking and ability to navigate the facility also affected a facility’s net positive score in the survey.
One of the survey’s more revealing findings is that nearly three-fifths of respondents—58%—went to another location—such as a pharmacy, or an urgent clinic—as part of their trip for healthcare.
Word of mouth often defines quality of care
Patients seem to be open to diverse care choices. For example, 29% said they have visited a retail clinic, such as a CVS, and would do so again. Gen Z and Millennials are more likely to frequent retail clinics for their convenient appointment schedules and shorter wait times.
More than two-fifths of respondents—42%—had a telehealth appointment within the last year, which was slightly down from the 45% in JLL’s 2022 survey. This year’s poll also found that 29% of telehealth appointments led to an in-person visit.
More than 40% of respondents ranked “reputation of quality” among the top five factors for choosing care. But where they get their impressions about quality varies.
Referrals play a larger role in specialist, outpatient surgery and inpatient care. Recommendations from friends ranked most highly for behavioral health, given the personal nature of such care, and was ranked in the top five by 31% of respondents. Younger patients, who “have yet to develop brand loyalty,” according to the survey, are more likely to rely on word-of-mouth recommendations than older patients for whom hospital systems’ reps matter more.
Outpatient surgery and primary care ranked highest for provider satisfaction; emergency care ranked lowest. Participants ranked their experiences on 12 aspects of care, and the biggest gap between “promoters” and “detractors” was for the service level of providers. Primary care had the highest net provider score, with 86% of respondents ranking its care as “attentive.”
Some amenities draw patients
While not a decision-making factor, amenities do attract some patients. Among the survey’s respondents, 63% said they would be interested in visiting a healthcare facility with an additional amenity, such as alternative medicine, a restaurant, fitness center, or spa. (This inclination was more evident among younger respondents.)
The overall quality of facilities, including the comfort of their waiting rooms, can impact a patient’s choice, especially for inpatient, urgent, and emergency care. The survey also found that urban locations have lower favorability rankings for their facilities, signaling room for improvement. (Just under half—48%—of respondents live in the suburbs.)
Related Stories
| Aug 11, 2010
America's Greenest Hospital
Hospitals are energy gluttons. With 24/7/365 operating schedules and stringent requirements for air quality in ORs and other clinical areas, an acute-care hospital will gobble up about twice the energy per square foot of, say, a commercial office building. It is an achievement worth noting, therefore, when a major hospital achieves LEED Platinum status, especially when that hospital attains 14 ...
| Aug 11, 2010
Hospital Additions + Renovations: 14 Lessons from Expert Building Teams
Two additions to a community hospital in Ohio that will double its square footage. A 12-story addition on top of an existing 12-story tower at Houston's M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. A $54 million renovation and addition at the University of Virginia Medical Center. A 67-bed, $70 million addition/renovation to a community hospital that is only five years old.
| Aug 11, 2010
Research Facility Breaks the Mold
In the market for state-of-the-art biomedical research space in Boston's Longwood Medical Area? Good news: there are still two floors available in the Center for Life Science | Boston, a multi-tenant, speculative high-rise research building designed by Tsoi/Kobus & Associates, Boston, and developed by Lyme Properties, Hanover, N.
| Aug 11, 2010
3 Hospitals, 3 Building Teams, 1 Mission: Optimum Sustainability
It's big news in any city when a new billion-dollar hospital is announced. Imagine what it must be like to have not one, not two, but three such blockbusters in the works, each of them tracking LEED-NC Gold certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. That's the case in San Francisco, where three new billion-dollar-plus healthcare facilities are in various stages of design and constructi...
| Aug 11, 2010
Holyoke Health Center
The team behind the new Holyoke (Mass.) Health Center was aiming for more than the renovation of a single building—they were hoping to revive an entire community. Holyoke's central business district was built in the 19th century as part of a planned industrial town, but over the years it had fallen into disrepair.
| Aug 11, 2010
Right-Sizing Healthcare
Over the past 30 years or so, the healthcare industry has quietly super-sized its healthcare facilities. Since 1980, ORs have bulked up in size by 53%, acute-care patient rooms by 77%. The slow creep went unlabeled until recently, when consultant H. Scot Latimer applied the super-sizing moniker to hospitals, inpatient rooms, operating rooms, and other treatment and administrative spaces.
| Aug 11, 2010
Great Solutions: Healthcare
11. Operating Room-Integrated MRI will Help Neurosurgeons Get it Right the First Time A major limitation of traditional brain cancer surgery is the lack of scanning capability in the operating room. Neurosurgeons do their best to visually identify and remove the cancerous tissue, but only an MRI scan will confirm if the operation was a complete success or not.