flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Harlem Renaissance: A vacant school provides much-needed housing and a clubhouse for children

Reconstruction Awards

Harlem Renaissance: A vacant school provides much-needed housing and a clubhouse for children

Word that PS 186 might be demolished brought out the preservationists, whose letter-writing campaign gained the support of the New York Landmarks Conservancy.


By Robert Cassidy, Executive Editor | November 13, 2017
The after school program in the new clubhouse

The afterschool program in the new clubhouse attracts children whose grandparents once attended PS 186. The Boys & Girls Club of Harlem partnered with Alembic Community Development and Monadnock Development on the $45.4 million project. Photo: David Sundberg / ESTO.

The adaptive reuse of PS 186 in West Harlem shows what can be done when imagination and determination come together.

Through the combined efforts of the Boys & Girls Club of Harlem and its development partners, an abandoned public school has been turned into an anchor institution for the Hamilton Heights neighborhood. The adaptive reuse of the 114-year-old school provides two sorely needed services: an 11,300-sf clubhouse with an after-school program and teen center, and 79 units of affordable housing in a neighborhood that is feeling the negative effects of gentrification.

PS 186 was designed by architect Charles B. J. Snyder, Superintendent of School Buildings for the NYC Board of Education from 1891 to 1923. The five-story buff-and-red-brick structure, designed in the Italian Renaissance Revival style, followed Snyder’s signature H-shaped floor plan, which formed open courtyards that brought daylight into the classrooms.

 

Children enter the Boys & Girls Club of HarlemChildren enter the Boys & Girls Club of Harlem at the upper courtyard on 145th Street. The decorative metal railings and gates were carefully reconstructed. Another entrance provides an ADA-compliant walkway to the residential quarters.

 

Completed in 1903, the school was immediately filled with the children of immigrant families.

PS 186 continued to serve the neighborhood around 145th Street and Amsterdam Avenue for another seven decades, but in 1975 the city declared it unsafe for occupancy, closed it, and transferred the site to the New York County Local Development Corporation. In 1986, the Boys & Girls Club of Harlem (BGCH) bought the property for $215,000.

There it sat for more than two decades. Weeds, even whole trees, clogged the classrooms. Wood floors turned spongy from the damp conditions. Hundreds of pigeon carcasses littered the upper floors. Homeless people squatted amid the ruins. Members of Community Board 9 and the local homeowners association called for the BGCH to take action. Some in the community demanded that the building be razed.

In 2009, the club, in partnership with Alembic Development, proposed a $79 million plan to demolish the school and build a new 200,000-sf home for the group, plus affordable housing, and community and retail space.

Word that PS 186 might be demolished brought out the preservationists, whose letter-writing campaign gained the support of the New York Landmarks Conservancy. But when the community board turned down a bid to have the school declared a landmark, the BGCH claimed that renovating the building without the attendant historic preservation tax breaks was not feasible.

Everything started to change in 2012, as rumors of a plan to reuse PS 186 began to buzz through the streets of West Harlem. In late 2013, Monadnock Construction bought the building from the Boys & Girls Club. Shortly thereafter, Dattner Architects was hired to seek a rezoning for a mixed-use redevelopment with affordable housing and a flagship location for the club. Preservation, once thought impossible, was now the seen as the enlightened path.

What made the deal financially feasible was a conditional approval from the National Park Service stating that PS 186 represented a historically significant example of early 20th-century school architecture. This made it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and opened the door to what would become about $20 million in historic preservation tax credits.

 

The development provides 79 affordable housing units on its four upper floors: 19 studios, 39 one-bedrooms, 12 two-bedrooms, and nine lofts. Monthly rents range from $508 for a subsidized studio to $2,738 for a market-rate two-bedroom. The 100,520-sf project is participating in the Enterprise Green Communities sustainability program.

 

To comply with the NPS ruling, the reconstruction had to adhere to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. This meant that the project team had to maintain Snyder’s H-shaped floor plan. Numerous character-defining interior features—ornamental staircases, high ceilings, and a decorative stage known as the principal’s platform—were also preserved.

Key elements of the Italian Renaissance exterior were restored. Based on historic photographs of the original cornice, now damaged beyond repair, the design team worked with a manufacturer to create a support system for a new glass-reinforced cornice. A niche overlooking the historic entry to the school that holds a statue of Minerva, goddess of wisdom and knowledge, also was rejuvenated.

The north and south courtyards were reclaimed. From specimens of existing material, the team reconstructed the decorative iron railings and gates. Stone stairs that had been replaced with concrete block were brought back to their virginal state. An ADA-compliant entry walkway from the street to the residence entry was installed. Two new exit doors were punched out to provide safe egress from the apartment floors (two to five).

Sound attenuation in the residential floors was also addressed. Window units and exterior glass doors were recreated from historic photographs and extant drawings of the school.

Although it took 30 years to complete, the project was applauded by the Reconstruction Awards jury as a shining example of what can be done to bestow new life on the thousands of vacant public schools that face ruin in America’s older cities. Others apparently agree. The project has also won the New York Landmarks Conservancy Lucy G. Moss Award and the Society of American Registered Architects New York Design Award.

 

PS 186 in 1903PS 186 opened in 1903 in response to the population explosion in the Hamilton Heights section of Harlem. The school offered adult night classes and became a neighborhood institution but closed in 1975. With its recent renovation, it is back as a community hub.

 

Project Sumamry

 

Platinum Award Winner

Building Team | Dattner Architects (submitting firm, architect, interiors) Boys & Girls Club of Harlem, Alembic Community Development, and Monadnock Development (owners) DeNardis Engineering (SE) Abraham Joselow PC (MEP) Michael A. Tomlan, FAPTI (historic preservation consultant) Construction Specifications, Inc. (specifications) Lumen Architecture (lighting) AKRF (acoustics) JM Zoning (expediting) SWA (sustainability consultant) Jim Harwood Architects (ornamental masonry consultant) Monadnock Construction (GC).

Details | 111,820 sf Total cost $45.4 million. Construction time: March 2012 to October 2016. Delivery method: Design-bid-build.

 

See all of the 2017 Reconstruction Award winners here

Related Stories

University Buildings | Aug 25, 2022

Higher education, striving for ‘normal’ again, puts student needs at the center of project planning

Sustainability and design flexibility are what higher education clients are seeking consistently, according to the dozen AEC Giants contacted for this article. “University campuses across North America are commissioning new construction projects designed to make existing buildings and energy systems more sustainable, and are building new flexible learning space that bridge the gap between remote and in-person learning,” say Patrick McCafferty, Arup’s Education Business Leader–Americas East region, and Matt Humphries, Education Business Leader in Canada region.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Contractors + CM Firms 2022

Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, DPR Construction, and Skanska USA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Engineering + EA Firms 2022

Jacobs, CRB, Fluor, and Affiliated Engineers Inc. head the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 100 Science + Technology Facility Architecture + AE Firms 2022

HDR, Flad Architects, Gensler, and DGA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 45 Laboratory Facility Contractors and Construction Management Firms for 2022

Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, McCarthy, and STO Building Group top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 55 Laboratory Facility Engineering + EA Firms for 2022

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers Inc., Burns & McDonnell, and WSP top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 85 Laboratory Facility Architecture + AE Firms for 2022

Flad Architects, HDR, DGA, and Payette top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 90 University Contractors and Construction Management Firms for 2022

Turner Construction, Whiting-Turner Contracting, PCL Construction Enterprises, and DPR Construction lead the ranking of the nation's largest university sector contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 85 University Engineering + EA Firms for 2022

AECOM, Jacobs, Salas O'Brien, and IMEG head the ranking of the nation's largest university sector engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 90 Construction Management Firms for 2022

CBRE, Alfa Tech, Jacobs, and Hill International head the rankings of the nation's largest construction management (as agent) and program/project management firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category


Mass Timber

Bjarke Ingels Group designs a mass timber cube structure for the University of Kansas

Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) and executive architect BNIM have unveiled their design for a new mass timber cube structure called the Makers’ KUbe for the University of Kansas School of Architecture & Design. A six-story, 50,000-sf building for learning and collaboration, the light-filled KUbe will house studio and teaching space, 3D-printing and robotic labs, and a ground-level cafe, all organized around a central core.



halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021