flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

5 guiding principles for solving airflow issues in open-plenum office spaces

5 guiding principles for solving airflow issues in open-plenum office spaces

Although architecturally appealing, exposed ceilings can create unwanted drafts and airflow problems if not engineered correctly.


By Bill Stangeland, McGuire Engineers, Chicago | November 10, 2014
While the exposed ceiling look is popular in todays commercial office spaces, s
While the exposed ceiling look is popular in todays commercial office spaces, some areas of dropped ceiling may be necessary to

While exposed ceilings in office interiors lend a spacious, open feel, this trendy architectural feature has created a new challenge: finding a viable return air path. Plenum ceilings use the area between the dropped ceiling and the floor slab above as a return air path, but when these dropped ceilings are removed, the plenum area is reduced and can restrict the flow of return air.

Since air will always take the path of least resistance, removing all or part of the dropped ceiling and reducing the plenum area can create unique pressure and return airflow patterns, which can vary on a daily, weekly, and seasonal basis, and are usually at their worst when the air handling system is economizer mode (taking in larger quantities of outside air).

Fortunately, with some sound engineering directive, it is often possible to preserve the exposed ceiling while promoting desirable return airflow patterns. Boiled down into five guiding principles, the following can be successfully applied to evaluate and often overcome the exposed ceiling challenge.

 

1. Better to oversize, not undersize, return air transfer openings.

While architects generally want return air openings to be as small as possible from an aesthetic point of view, engineers strongly recommend generously sizing them in order to encourage the air to properly flow through. Because air will take the path of least resistance to find its way back to the central return air duct and then to the air handling unit, if these openings are undersized, air may flow elsewhere.

One of the most common problems occurs when entry doors to a space are opened and air rushes through these doors. In severe conditions, the doors may even stay partially open due to the strong airflow. A good rule of thumb is to size return air transfer openings so that the air flows through at a low velocity of roughly 250 feet per minute.

 

2. Select areas of dropped ceilings are often necessary.

In addition to the potentially undesirable aesthetics associated with larger return air openings, exposed ceilings can pose significant acoustical challenges as well. Whether it’s a fan-powered box, duct leakage from improperly sealed ductwork or the sound of air traveling back to the main return, large, open ceilings provide no barrier to attenuate sound.

One potential solution could be dropping in a few architectural clouds, particularly in places where the main return air openings are located (typically near building “core” areas – i.e. elevator banks). For spaces that are particularly challenged acoustically, add sides on the clouds to create a more effective acoustical buffer while still preserving the open plenum look and hiding unsightly mechanical equipment.

 

3. Avoid returning air through adjacent tenant spaces.

In some buildings with dropped ceilings, return air was designed to run above multiple tenant spaces to find its way back to the central return opening. However, when two tenants with open ceilings are located next to one another, running return air from one tenant space through another is not only undesirable (your neighbor won’t appreciate the smell of your burnt popcorn), but in all likelihood does not meet local code requirements either. 

In order to mitigate this, the engineering team should take a holistic look at the building design to figure out exactly how the air is flowing so that a proper return air path can be created for all tenant spaces.

 

4. Carefully survey the core area ceilings to identify ductwork or other items impeding the free flow of re-turn air.

While generously sizing the return plenum air opening can be an effective way to support optimal air-flow, if the core space is packed with ductwork and/or piping, and thus reducing the area of the return air path, it can create insurmountable challenges. Even if return air openings to the plenum are generously sized, a congested return air plenum will restrict airflow and may still result in undesirable airflow patterns as noted in Item 1. 

McGuire was brought in to help with corrections on a recent project: a new tenant occupying two floors inside a Midwest office building added a stairwell to connect their floors. The upper floor’s return air plenum was very congested, which had never been an issue until the new stair was added. The stairwell introduced a new path for the air to flow, creating significant draft issues in the lower floor’s reception area.

In cases such as these, creative engineering must be employed to provide another more appropriate path for the airflow.

 

5. Every building is different and main air system imbalance or congested corridor ceilings may be difficult or impossible to overcome.

Yet another potential difficulty with exposed ceilings comes into play when a high percentage of outside air is desired for natural ventilation. For example, on a 55°F to 60°F day, a building’s air handling units may run in economizer mode to bring in larger amounts of outside air for “free” cooling. Of course, this same air needs to be returned and exhausted. If an adequate return air path isn’t properly designed—perhaps due to congested ceilings or inadequate transfer openings  – the return air problems can often be exacerbated when the building systems are in economizer mode. In such a situation, the building may decide to limit the percentage of outside air intake. While the optimal solution may be to significantly change the layout and re-engineer the space, such an approach may be cost prohibitive. 

 

Careful Consideration

When moving into an existing building and redesigning your space with an open plenum, all HVAC idiosyncrasies must be carefully evaluated. While airflow in an existing tenant space with closed ceilings may be working just fine, once the ceiling is opened up, issues can arise. If any significant issues with regards to the main building air system are discovered, an open ceiling may simply not work, unless the building owner is willing to make the required changes to support a proper return air flow design.

When considering an exposed ceiling for a tenant build-out, it’s important to confer with the facility manager about air patterns, in addition to speaking with other tenants in the building who may have exposed ceilings to learn more about how the air is flowing through those particular spaces.

Armed with this information, the building team can better determine exactly how to design the desired open ceiling space and air plenum to support the architect’s plan, both aesthetically and functionally – maintaining optimal comfort for all occupants.

 

About the Author
Bill Stangeland is President and Partner with McGuire Engineers. He has more than 30 years of experience in HVAC and plumbing systems design. He is responsible for overall quality control of the firm's business, fostering client satisfaction, and the mentoring and development of new and existing staff. Stangeland's extensive experience encompasses commercial projects, branch banks, churches, auditoriums, medical office buildings, and out-patient surgical suites. He maintains strong client relationships by delivering successful projects that meet each client's unique goals and needs.

Related Stories

| Aug 11, 2010

HNTB, Arup, Walter P Moore among SMPS National Marketing Communications Awards winners

The Society for Marketing Professional Services (SMPS) is pleased to announce the 2009 recipients of the 32nd Annual National Marketing Communications Awards (MCA). This annual competition is the longest-standing, most prestigious awards program recognizing excellence in marketing and communications by professional services firms in the design and building industry.

| Aug 11, 2010

'Flexible' building designed to physically respond to the environment

The ecoFLEX project, designed by a team from Shepley Bulfinch, has won a prestigious 2009 Unbuilt Architecture Design Award from the Boston Society of Architects. EcoFLEX features heat-sensitive assemblies composed of a series of bi-material strips. The assemblies’ form modulate with the temperature to create varying levels of shading and wind shielding, flexing when heated to block sunlight and contracting when cooled to allow breezes to pass through the screen.

| Aug 11, 2010

New book provides energy efficiency guidance for hotels

Recommendations on achieving 30% energy savings over minimum code requirements are contained in the newly published Advanced Energy Design Guide for Highway Lodging.   The energy savings guidance for design of new hotels provides a first step toward achieving a net-zero-energy building.

| Aug 11, 2010

Perkins+Will master plans Vedanta University teaching hospital in India

Working together with the Anil Agarwal Foundation, Perkins+Will developed the master plan for the Medical Precinct of a new teaching hospital in a remote section of Puri, Orissa, India. The hospital is part of an ambitious plan to develop this rural area into a global center of education and healthcare that would be on par with Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford.

| Aug 11, 2010

Burt Hill, HOK top BD+C's ranking of the nation's 100 largest university design firms

A ranking of the Top 100 University Design Firms based on Building Design+Construction's 2009 Giants 300 survey. For more Giants 300 rankings, visit http://www.BDCnetwork.com/Giants

| Aug 11, 2010

PBK, DLR Group among nation's largest K-12 school design firms, according to BD+C's Giants 300 report

A ranking of the Top 75 K-12 School Design Firms based on Building Design+Construction's 2009 Giants 300 survey. For more Giants 300 rankings, visit http://www.BDCnetwork.com/Giants

| Aug 11, 2010

Turner Building Cost Index dips nearly 4% in second quarter 2009

Turner Construction Company announced that the second quarter 2009 Turner Building Cost Index, which measures nonresidential building construction costs in the U.S., has decreased 3.35% from the first quarter 2009 and is 8.92% lower than its peak in the second quarter of 2008. The Turner Building Cost Index number for second quarter 2009 is 837.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021