flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

A survey challenges the efficacy of decentralized nurses station design

Healthcare Facilities

A survey challenges the efficacy of decentralized nurses station design

The Institute of Health + Wellness Design at the University of Kansas raised questions after reviewing a hospital’s renovated orthopedic unit.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | January 19, 2017

Decentralized nurses stations are becoming more common in hospitals looking to improve their patient satisfaction scores. But a University of Kansas research team wonders whether decentralization might be hampering nurses' collaboration. Image: University of Kansas

When evidence-based design collides with conventional wisdom, the outcome will sometimes be disruptive.

Take, for example, the generally accepted advantages in patient care and observation related to decentralizing nurses’ stations in hospitals, which is becoming standard practice for healthcare clients and their AEC partners.

A recent evaluation of a renovated Missouri hospital, conducted by University of Kansas faculty members, raised questions about the impact of decentralization on patient satisfaction and the communication among nursing teams within the facility.

The St. Louis-based architectural firm Lawrence Group retained the Institute for Health + Wellness Design (IHWD) at KU’s School of Architecture, Design, and Planning to provide a third-party review of the firm’s 2014 remodeling of the orthopedic unit at SSM St. Mary’s Hospital in Jefferson City. That healthcare system was about to embark on an expansion of its St. Joseph Hospital West in Lake St. Louis.

Lawrence Group is an affiliate member of IHWD.

The Institute assessed the unit using an evidence-based design checklist developed by the nonprofit Center for Health Design in California. Its survey included a “space syntax” evaluation that generated a heat map, which showed how the unit’s layout might affect patient satisfaction.

“We wanted to see does moving into a new facility improve patient satisfaction scores, which is one of the most important things for hospital owners today,” said Hui Cai, Assistant Professor at KU, who with Professor Kent Spreckelmeyer and Frank Zilm, IHWD’s chairman, presented findings from the Institute’s nursing unit study at the Healthcare Design Conference 2016 in Houston last November.

The study found, perhaps not surprisingly, that the facility itself showed “statistically significant increase[s]” in scores after the renovation. But patient-quality scores mostly stayed the same, and one score—nurses’ responses to patient calls—actually dropped slightly.

The Institute hypothesizes that decentralization was the culprit, due to the physical distance and visual disconnection of decentralized nursing unit design, which necessitates that nurses must move farther to get from station to station. The Institute suggests these distances might be an impediment to interaction among nurses that might also delay responses to patients.

“This design trend needs to be further investigated before it is accepted as standard for every hospital,” said Cai. “We have to see how to modify the design to achieve balance between shorter walking distance, better patient surveillance and better staff communication and collaboration.”

This is one of the first research studies to link decentralized nurse station design with organizational performance and patient outcomes. The Institute has conducted a second phase of study to evaluate further the degree to which decentralized design affects nurses’ teamwork and patients’ perception of care. In late 2017, IHWD plans to present and publish the results of this study, which included a second hospital, the University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro, N.J.

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022

Top 170 Healthcare Sector Architecture + AE Firms for 2022

HDR, CannonDesign, HKS, and Stantec top the ranking of the nation's largest healthcare sector architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors all healthcare sector work, including hospitals, outpatient facilities, and medical office buildings. 

| Sep 8, 2022

The Twin Cities’ LGBTQ health clinic moves into a new and improved facility

For more than 50 years, Family Tree Clinic has provided reproductive and sexual health services to underserved populations—from part of an old schoolhouse, until recently.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 90 Construction Management Firms for 2022

CBRE, Alfa Tech, Jacobs, and Hill International head the rankings of the nation's largest construction management (as agent) and program/project management firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 200 Contractors for 2022

Turner Construction, STO Building Group, Whiting-Turner, and DPR Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest general contractors, CM at risk firms, and design-builders for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 45 Engineering Architecture Firms for 2022

Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and Burns & McDonnell top the rankings of the nation's largest engineering architecture (EA) firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 80 Engineering Firms for 2022

Kimley-Horn, Tetra Tech, Langan, and NV5 head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 21, 2022

Top 110 Architecture/Engineering Firms for 2022

Stantec, HDR, HOK, and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 20, 2022

Top 180 Architecture Firms for 2022

Gensler, Perkins and Will, HKS, and Perkins Eastman top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 19, 2022

2022 Giants 400 Report: Tracking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms

Now 46 years running, Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report rankings the largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. This year a record 519 AEC firms participated in BD+C's Giants 400 report. The final report includes more than 130 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021