flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Power of IPD: Is integrated project delivery truly a transformative delivery model?

Power of IPD: Is integrated project delivery truly a transformative delivery model?

Now that many of the first-generation IPD projects have been completed, CBRE Healthcare's Tim McCurley and Stephen Powell ponder the lessons learned and pros and cons of the industry's newest delivery model. 


By Tim McCurley & Stephen Powell, CBRE Healthcare | June 23, 2014
Photo Credit: Mark Ahsmann, Wikimedia Commons.
Photo Credit: Mark Ahsmann, Wikimedia Commons.

In 2007, the seemingly new term Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) was making its way through the inner circles of contractors, architects and owners. IPD was developed as a method to enhance lagging efficiencies in the construction industry. During this time, it was no secret that major capital projects were a high risk endeavor, potentially wrought with problems, cost overruns, finger pointing and backstabbing. Furthermore, relationships began quickly deteriorating, problems ensued and the building owners were left holding the bag.

IPD was the method that was going to transform the construction industry into a model of efficiency and teamwork. Now, after approximately seven years, many of the “beta test” projects have been completed using the IPD Model. What have we learned? And is it truly a transformative delivery model?

Is it relational?

IPD is billed as being a relational delivery method due to the Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA) or tri-party contract which provides financial incentive to mitigate risk. This is a true statement from a contracting stance. Many IPD contracts are developed to hold the project team members accountable when dealing with project risks.

This is helpful to the lower tiered subcontractors and consultants who, in a traditional process, would usually bear the most risk in project issues. In an IPD process, teams are incentivized by dealing with these issues quickly in order to get them completed in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. If this doesn’t happen, it will increase costs which will in turn increase risks to their own incentives and profits. 

Regardless of the delivery model, it is still impossible to contract trust. What held true in a traditional project still holds true in IPD. Teams must be able to trust one another. The IPD team could possibly be the biggest factor in determining the success of a project. CBRE Healthcare has facilitated engagements where contractors, architects and owners believe they are ready for IPD only to find themselves slipping right back into traditional project delivery methods. Just saying you are using IPD does not make it true. The attitude and culture must be sincere to ensure success.

Is it collaborative?

For most project teams, collaboration is one of the biggest changes and challenges from a traditional method. Architects and planners no longer act alone in the early design process. Contractors find themselves participating in conversations from the design intent of a patient room to a clock's location on a given wall. Initially, this interaction can be awkward and tricky. Establishing a process early in the initiation phase will ensure team members are acclimated to their new roles and are confident in their participation. Architects and contractors come to rely on the new partnership that fosters accountability within the parameters that have been established.

Is it Lean?

IPD was initially born out of Lean Methodologies. The main element of Lean that applies to IPD is the elimination of waste and duplication. One objective in eliminating waste is to avoid multiple entities creating different iterations of the same drawing. Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a useful tool in achieving this goal.

Imagine for a moment the traditional design to final product process. First, a designer creates a set of drawings and specifications for a design element. Then, it’s sent to a contractor(s) and they establish a price on the design. Next, the contractor must send a set of drawings and information back to the designer (known as a submittal) to be checked for accuracy and to ensure the contractor understands the design. Rarely does the submittal process end there. For a variety of reasons, there are usually changes and redesign. This means more drawing iterations, detail changes and mistakes.

The use of BIM in construction is revolutionizing the industry and combined with IPD it drastically improves the process as the designer and contractor are in one room working on the same building element. This allows for timely modifications due to design changes/enhancements or correcting design clashes/conflicts all while never changing “hands” or being printed.

Thanks to this process, when the final design is complete, the confidence level is extremely high, leading to another revolution in the construction industry: pre-manufacturing. Many other types of Lean Methodologies are seeing enormous success within construction in general. Combining Lean Methodologies with IPD makes for an even better process.

What Have We Learned?

Having been involved in numerous IPD projects, we have found that there are many factors that can impact success. Some of the most important, whether structured through an IFOA or merely operating in a collaborative environment (IPD “lite”), are team selection, team member experience, managing team member involvement and project size.

In order to have success on any project, specifically IPD, properly implementing the launch phase is critical. Owners not aligned in their overall strategies risk potential delays and setbacks. Probably, the most important step at this phase is team selection. A well-thought-out Request for Integrated Team (RFIT) will go a long way to ensuring success.

 

 

One of the key elements of the RFIT process is allowing teams to self-select/assemble. Though this concept may seem foreign, it provides owners confidence in knowing that their selected team has a history of working together, is aligned along common goals, and has a culture conducive to collaboration. We have seen it time and again: forced marriages rarely produce desired outcomes. Therefore, it is important for the owners to abandon past practices and external influences to enable the best team to rise to the top.

It is also a good idea to have a series of planned interactions with the top candidates prior to awarding the project. This will allow the owner to determine if each team can truly deliver on their claims and work well together. For example, the top candidates can evaluate the current program elements/budget and present their findings as a part of the selection process. Don’t set up anything too specific. Challenge the teams to identify solutions and not merely react to a set of guidelines.

A legitimate concern that most have upon engaging in IPD is whether the team truly has the required knowledge base to deliver the project. It seems these days that everyone claims to have IPD experience. But just saying so doesn’t make it true.

While architects and prime contractors may be well-versed in IPD methodology, subcontractors and consultants may not have the necessary experience and could potentially be a burden to the team. Be sure to truly investigate team claims and talk to references. Specifically ask about the collaborative nature of the team and their interactions with the referring staff. The contractors with the most experience will have developed a team of subs with whom they have proven success.

Contractors have found themselves in a much expanded role due to IPD. Their involvement has greatly increased as they are now engaged at the onset of the project. While this absolutely has value to the end result, ensuring a balance in their involvement is paramount to successfully transitioning from design to construction. The contractor is a large contributor in the success of maintaining IPD through the construction phase. If their commitment fades, it will inevitably lead projects back down a traditional delivery path.

And finally, not only does IPD work on large capital projects, but it can benefit small projects as well. During the early IPD days, it was noted that the process would only work on large construction projects. This was mainly due to the insurance structure that was required. Additionally, it was thought the early investment in resources from the contractor would not be cost-effective on a small project. However, we are seeing IPD implemented on smaller projects, and it’s a real testament to the fact that early investment in planning can pay off with any project. Contractors, and more importantly subcontractors, are finding value in the fact that they no longer have to budget for potential risk.

Conclusion

Recently, CBRE Healthcare polled participants of an ongoing project to determine how many team members had actually been involved in an IPD project. Interestingly enough, three team members were not even familiar with the traditional approach as they had never worked on anything but IPD projects. The construction industry is experiencing a paradigm shift. Owners are now realizing the benefits of Lean philosophies and IPD is the approach that delivers results. As the initial IPD projects come to completion, significant success stories are being communicated.

Capital project delivery methods may still have a ways to go in achieving efficiency, but, as the industry continues to evolve, we believe IPD is a step in the right direction. Everything is changing in project delivery. Are you onboard?

About the Authors
Tim McCurley is a Principal Consultant and Stephen Powell is a Senior Consultant at CBRE Healthcare.

Related Stories

| Aug 11, 2010

Luxury Hotel required faceted design

Goettsch Partners, Chicago, designed a new five-star, 214-room hotel for the King Abdullah Financial District (KAFD) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The design-build project, with Saudi Oger Ltd. as contractor and Rayadah Investment Co. as developer, has a three-story podium supporting a 17-story glass tower with a nine-story opening that allows light to penetrate the mass of the building.

| Aug 11, 2010

Three Schools checking into L.A.'s Ambassador Hotel site

Pasadena-based Gonzalez Goodale Architects is designing three new schools for Los Angeles Unified School District's Central Wilshire District. The $400 million campus, located on the site of the former Ambassador Hotel, will house a K-5 elementary school, a middle school, a high school, a shared recreation facility (including soccer field, 25-meter swimming pool, two gymnasiums), and a new publ...

| Aug 11, 2010

New Jersey's high-tech landscaping facility

Designed to enhance the use of science and technology in Bergen County Special Services' landscaping programs, the new single-story facility at the technical school's Paramus campus will have 7,950 sf of classroom space, a 1,000-sf greenhouse (able to replicate different environments, such as rainforest, desert, forest, and tundra), and 5,000 sf of outside landscaping and gardening space.

| Aug 11, 2010

U.S. firm designing massive Taiwan project

MulvannyG2 Architecture is designing one of Taipei, Taiwan's largest urban redevelopment projects. The Bellevue, Wash., firm is working with developer The Global Team Group to create Aquapearl, a mixed-use complex that's part of the Taipei government's "Good Looking Taipei 2010" initiative to spur redevelopment of the city's Songjian District.

| Aug 11, 2010

Florida mixed-use complex includes retail, residential

The $325 million Atlantic Plaza II lifestyle center will be built on 8.5 acres in Delray Beach, Fla. Designed by Vander Ploeg & Associates, Boca Raton, the complex will include six buildings ranging from three to five stories and have 182,000 sf of restaurant and retail space. An additional 106,000 sf of Class A office space and a residential component including 197 apartments, townhouses, ...

| Aug 11, 2010

Restoration gives new life to New Formalism icon

The $30 million upgrade, restoration, and expansion of the Mark Taper Forum in Los Angeles was completed by the team of Rios Clementi Hale Studios (architect), Harley Ellis Devereaux (executive architect/MEP), KPFF (structural engineer), and Taisei Construction (GC). Work on the Welton Becket-designed 1967 complex included an overhaul of the auditorium, lighting, and acoustics.

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms to Work For

2006 FreemanWhite Hnedak Bobo Group McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. Shawmut Design and Construction Walter P Moore 2007 Anshen+Allen Arup Bovis Lend Lease Cannon Design Jones Lang LaSalle Perkins+Will SmithGroup SSOE, Inc. Timothy Haahs & Associates, Inc. 2008 Gilbane Building Co. HDR KJWW Engineering Consultants Lord, Aeck & Sargent Mark G.

| Aug 11, 2010

High-Performance Workplaces

Building Teams around the world are finding that the workplace is changing radically, leading owners and tenants to reinvent corporate office buildings to compete more effectively on a global scale. The good news is that this means more renovation and reconstruction work at a time when new construction has stalled to a dribble.

| Aug 11, 2010

Great Solutions: Business Management

22. Commercial Properties Repositioned for University USE Tocci Building Companies is finding success in repositioning commercial properties for university use, and it expects the trend to continue. The firm's Capital Cove project in Providence, R.I., for instance, was originally designed by Elkus Manfredi (with design continued by HDS Architects) to be a mixed-use complex with private, market-...

| Aug 11, 2010

Nurturing the Community

The best seat in the house at the new Seahawks Stadium in Seattle isn't on the 50-yard line. It's in the southeast corner, at the very top of the upper bowl. "From there you have a corner-to-corner view of the field and an inspiring grasp of the surrounding city," says Kelly Kerns, project leader with architect/engineer Ellerbe Becket, Kansas City, Mo.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021