Higher education has historically been a mainstay for many AEC firms, but the economic downturn forced many colleges and universities to stretch out, stall, or even cancel capital projects. One positive sign is the June 13 announcement by Harvard University that it will resume development of its 500,000- to 600,000-sf Allston Health and Life Science Center in 2014, after halting construction in 2009. The estimated $1 billion-plus in work has AEC firms champing at the bit.
Is the Harvard announcement a sign of good things to come? Maybe. Maybe not.
Carole Wedge, FAIA, LEED AP, President of Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott, says university capital budgets look like they’ll be tight for some time to come. “We’re seeing higher-ed clients looking for ways to be smart about their capital investments,” she says. “More than simply prioritizing their capital spending, they want to determine the most impactful projects for their campuses.”
Chris Brasier, FAIA, LEED AP, Vice President of Clark Nexsen Architecture & Engineering, says he has seen greater activity in master planning and advanced planning for future projects, as well as more deferred maintenance work. “With endowments and state funding still recovering from the great recession, existing facilities are being repurposed with greater emphasis on flexibility to accommodate a broad range of instructional activity within a single space,” he says.
“Flexibility” is the catchword in collegiate facilities these days. Shepley Bulfinch’s Wedge cites interdisciplinary science facilities like the future Harvard’s Allston science center, which will house facilities for stem cell science as well as engineering and physical sciences, and the new College of Design, Engineering, and Commerce at Philadelphia University.
Brad Lukanic, AIA, LEED AP, Principal at Cannon Design, has noticed a trend toward flexibility at community colleges. “Space is at a premium, and we need to design buildings that offer learning everywhere,” he says. The focus must go beyond just the classroom, even into the corridors and collaboration spaces. “Everything must be flexible and ready for learning all the time,” he says.
STRETCHING BEYOND LEED
Universities are seeking more bang for the buck in terms of sustainability as well. Clark Nexsen’s Brasier says collegiate clients are demanding more than LEED certification: They’re expecting a bottom-line benefit in terms of reduced operating costs, especially through improved energy performance.
ZGF Architects’ Partner Ted Hyman, FAIA, agrees that clients are looking to sustainable design as a means to trim O&M costs, but says they don’t necessarily want to pay more for green buildings. “Using an integrated design approach and new analytical tools for performance modeling, we are finding we can deliver high-performance buildings at the same, or even lower, capital costs,” he says.
With some 677 institutions having signed the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment, achieving carbon neutrality is the ultimate goal. “Campuses are utilizing pilot projects to test implementation strategies on one building that could then be rolled out across campus,” says Chris Flint Chatto, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP. The ZGF Sustainable Design Associate points to his firm’s design for the University of Washington’s Molecular Engineering & Sciences building, which uses natural ventilation and phase change materials to eliminate cooling needs for faculty offices.
TRACKING THE TRENDS
Specific academic building types are experiencing change, according to Clark Nexsen’s Brasier. For example, the demand on campuses for more robust digital capacity is resulting in larger, more complex data centers. Libraries are filling up with team rooms, not only to foster greater collaboration among students, but also to provide advanced computer technology that most students can’t afford.
Gen Y students also have high expectations for residence halls, according to Clark Nexsen’s Operations Director Peter Aranyi, AIA, and Senior Architect Ken Gallaugher, AIA, LEED AP BD+C. From personal bathrooms to high-speed Internet access and flat-screen TVs, they expect privacy and a “live-and-learn” community atmosphere. Security is also a top priority, so res hall locks have gone wireless.
With jobs in short supply, more collegians are going to school year-round. This presents an operations hurdle for university facilities staff and construction firms that would normally use the summer months to repair and update facilities.
Interest in the use of building information modeling is also picking up, especially in the design and construction of research facilities, says Angus Leary, Chief Operating Officer, Northeast Region, Suffolk Construction. For science and technology projects, he says, “BIM is basically a requirement,” and his firm has begun utilizing 6D technology in this space.
Cautious optimism seems to be the best way to describe the university market. Suffolk Construction’s Leary says his firm is fairly bullish about work at institutions in the Northeast. Allyn Stellmacher, Design Partner at ZGF Architects, says the firm is “optimistic that this year is the last year of the recession.”
Fingers crossed. +
TOP 25 UNIVERSITY SECTOR ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 University Revenue ($) |
1 | Cannon Design | 87,000,000 |
2 | Perkins+Will | 44,649,973 |
3 | ZGF Architects | 31,513,344 |
4 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | 24,958,224 |
5 | SmithGroupJJR | 23,100,000 |
6 | HOK | 22,759,496 |
7 | Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott | 22,234,000 |
8 | IBI Group | 22,136,504 |
9 | Gensler | 19,250,500 |
10 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 17,783,000 |
11 | Ballinger | 17,460,661 |
12 | SHW Group | 16,273,552 |
13 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 16,200,000 |
14 | HMC Architects | 15,882,470 |
15 | Sasaki Associates | 14,861,566 |
16 | Flad Architects | 14,440,000 |
17 | HNTB Architecture | 13,220,652 |
18 | DLR Group | 13,140,000 |
19 | Perkins Eastman | 13,000,000 |
20 | Ennead Architects | 11,600,000 |
21 | S/L/A/M Collaborative, The | 10,658,510 |
22 | BSA LifeStructures | 10,303,967 |
23 | Heery International | 9,536,000 |
24 | LPA | 9,469,765 |
25 | Moseley Architects | 9,140,000 |
TOP 25 UNIVERSITY SECTOR ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 University Revenue ($) |
1 | URS Corp. | 85,600,000 |
2 | Jacobs | 75,100,000 |
3 | Stantec | 63,450,000 |
4 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 63,000,000 |
5 | Atkins North America | 29,899,688 |
6 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 21,900,000 |
7 | STV | 19,765,000 |
8 | Clark Nexsen | 18,681,885 |
9 | Eaton Energy Solutions | 15,863,119 |
10 | R.G. Vanderweil Engineers | 13,707,500 |
11 | Burns & McDonnell | 13,430,931 |
12 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 11,117,473 |
13 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 11,000,000 |
14 | Arup | 10,604,123 |
15 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | 9,800,000 |
16 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 8,690,000 |
17 | M/E Engineering | 7,700,000 |
18 | WSP USA | 7,300,000 |
19 | Bergmann Associates | 7,100,000 |
20 | Dewberry | 7,023,489 |
21 | P2S Engineering | 6,777,497 |
22 | Sebesta Blomberg | 6,695,924 |
23 | Stanley Consultants | 6,100,000 |
24 | RMF Engineering | 6,000,000 |
25 | Heapy Engineering | 5,869,055 |
TOP 25 UNIVERSITY SECTOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 University Revenue ($) |
1 | M+W U.S. | 908,412,342 |
2 | Gilbane Building Co. | 847,038,000 |
3 | Turner Corp., The | 748,000,000 |
4 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 682,884,910 |
5 | Skanska USA | 514,460,894 |
6 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 505,659,766 |
7 | Swinerton | 302,950,000 |
8 | Balfour Beatty US | 299,314,655 |
9 | Structure Tone | 275,420,000 |
10 | Sundt Construction | 254,698,897 |
11 | Hunt Construction Group | 247,500,000 |
12 | JE Dunn Construction | 236,307,786 |
13 | McCarthy Holdings | 217,000,000 |
14 | W. M. Jordan Co. | 191,930,824 |
15 | Shawmut Design and Construction | 179,900,000 |
16 | Messer Construction | 178,769,470 |
17 | Suffolk Construction | 172,662,764 |
18 | Flintco | 171,600,000 |
19 | Mortenson Construction | 169,890,000 |
20 | Tutor Perini Corp. | 167,393,000 |
21 | Manhattan Construction Group | 163,093,000 |
22 | Lend Lease | 157,270,352 |
23 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 156,030,000 |
24 | Barton Malow | 148,648,720 |
25 | Austin Industries | 142,032,883 |
Related Stories
| Aug 11, 2010
USGBC’s Greenbuild 2009 brings global ideas to local main streets
Save the planet with indigenous knowledge. Make permanent water part of your life. Dive deep water for clues to environmental success. Connect site selection to successful creative concepting. Explore the unknown with Discovery Channel’s best known guide. These are but a few of the big ideas participants can connect to at USGBC’s Greenbuild International Conference and Expo, taking place on November 11-13, 2009 in Phoenix, Ariz.
| Aug 11, 2010
Goettsch Partners wins design competition for Soochow Securities HQ in China
Goettsch Partners (GP) has been selected as the winning firm in the competition to design the Soochow Securities Headquarters, the new office and stock exchange building for Soochow Securities Co. Ltd. The 21-story, 441,300-square-foot project includes 344,400 square feet of office space, an 86,100-square-foot stock exchange, meeting rooms, classrooms, a cafeteria, and underground parking for 400 cars and 800 bicycles.
| Aug 11, 2010
RMJM unveils design details for $1B green development in Turkey
International architecture company RMJM today announced details of the $1 billion Varyap Meridian development it is designing in Istanbul’s new residential and business district, which will be one of the "greenest" projects in Turkey. The luxury 372,000-square-meter development on a site totalling 107,000 square meters will be located in the Atasehir district of Istanbul, which the Turkish government intends to transform into the country’s new financial district and business center.
| Aug 11, 2010
Urban Land Institute honors five 'outstanding' developments in Europe, Middle East, and Africa
Five outstanding developments have been selected as winners of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) 2009 Awards for Excellence: Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) competition. This year, the competition also included the announcement of two special award winners. The Awards for Excellence competition is widely regarded as the land use industry’s most prestigious recognition program.
| Aug 11, 2010
Design firms slash IT spending in 2009
Over half of architecture, engineering, and environmental consulting firms (55%) are budgeting less for information technology in 2009 than they did in 2008, according to a new report from ZweigWhite. The 2009 Information Technology Survey reports that firms' 2009 IT budgets are a median of 3.3% of net service revenue, down from 3.6% in 2008. Firms planning to decrease spending are expected to do so by a median of 20%.
| Aug 11, 2010
A glimmer of hope amid grim news as construction employment falls in most states, metro areas
The construction employment picture brightened slightly with 18 states adding construction jobs from April to May according to a new analysis of data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). However, construction employment overall continued to decline, noted Ken Simonson, the chief economist for the Associated General Contractors of America.
| Aug 11, 2010
Thom Mayne unveils 'floating cube' design for the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas
Calling it a “living educational tool featuring architecture inspired by nature and science,” Pritzker Prize Laureate Thom Mayne and leaders from the Museum of Nature & Science unveiled the schematic designs and building model for the Perot Museum of Nature & Science at Victory Park. Groundbreaking on the approximately $185 million project will be held later this fall, and the Museum is expected to open by early 2013.
| Aug 11, 2010
SOM's William F. Baker awarded Fritz Leonhardt Prize for achievement in structural engineering
In recognition of his engineering accomplishments, which include many of the tallest skyscrapers of our time, William F. Baker received the coveted Fritz Leonhardt Prize in Stuttgart, Germany. He is the first American to receive the prize.