flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Design-build delivery is setting new parameters for project management

Building Team

Design-build delivery is setting new parameters for project management

FMI paper provides clues to what makes these contracts click (or not).


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | January 4, 2019

Design-build, especially as part of P3 agreements, is steadily becoming the preferred contractual delivery method for nonresidential construction. Image: FMI

More owners and developers are latching onto design-build as a preferred delivery method for projects large and small. And a new paper from FMI, the construction management consultant and investment banking firm, outlines how AEC firms and their clients that enter into such contracts are avoiding stress points that often bog down construction.

Drawing on FMI’s “2018 Design-Build Utilization” report, “the paper, “The Growing World of Design-Build,” written by FMI senior consultant Paul Trombitas, estimates that design-build project delivery will increase by 18% between 2018 and 2021, and comprise 44% of total construction spending, or the equivalent of $1.19 trillion over that four-year span.  

A sustained emphasis toward educating owners and project stakeholders on the process and benefits associated with design-build has facilitated continued adoption and greater utilization industrywide. On the public side, increased design-build legislation has helped push the adoption of such projects. On the private side, owners tend to select design-build for unique and challenging projects that require lots of collaboration.

Design-build is projected to account for 44% of all construction spending for the years 2018 through 2021. Image: FMI

 

Of the various customer segments that use design-build, manufacturing, road infrastructure, and education will represent the greatest percentage of design-build construction spending over the next three years, states FMI.

In addition to larger and more complex projects, design-build continues to expand into project sizes of less than $25 million, as owners continue to gain exposure to the benefits of the delivery method.

However, design-build has its own set of challenges that, according to FMI principal Bill Spragins, revolve around the differing roles assumed by the parties, the number of decisions that must be made simultaneously, and the increased speed of decision-making associated with compression of the design and construction cycle.

For example, a project is potentially set up fail when owners confine their use of this delivery method to procurement without aligning the decision-making and approval processes within the organization to meet scheduling needs. A project can also be derailed by misaligned expectations between the owner and design-builder regarding the level of control that the owner’s team retains over design decisions.

Consequently, for a design-build delivery method to work, specific parameters need to be established about project scope, scheduling, and who’s responsible for what.

FMI states that AEC firms looking to win design-build projects need to think strategically: What slices of the market are they targeting, who are the right customers, what services do they need, and how do these offerings set a firm apart from its competition?

 

FMI recommends that AEC firms take a customer-focused approach when trying to win design-build contracts. Image: FMI

 

FMI uses a “4C model” to illustrate the context of profitable growth. Its starts with defining the business “climate” that the AEC firm is operating in—from demographics to regulations—and then digging deeper into possible changes, expectations, and needs of customers

AEC firms need to find out what criteria owners use to select contractors. They also need to weigh their own strengths and weaknesses against competitors’ for a given project.

FMI singles out a number of steps for winning design-build projects:

•Build a compelling story about why your firm is right for the project

•Build a go-to-market strategy that defines customers before an RFP hits the street

•Think like a customer

•Find out what the customer wants and why it’s important.

•Put your time where your strategy is. Build in organizational capacity that’s centered on a key focus, such as spending time with customers in advance.

The paper provides some avenues for minimizing stress points that can arise during a design-build contract. Having early and continued alignment among all project owners and stakeholders can help remove or limit these issues.

Make sure you completely understand requirements or other bidding assumptions, particularly on design-build projects. Of the projects FMI studied, 25% fell victim to this. At times, even the owner won’t understand the true impact of some of the requirements that are written into the contract.

Make sure there are formal internal hand-off meeting(s) between estimating/preconstruction and project management/field operations. This should include subcontractor involvement in planning the work.

Within the design-build arena, public-private partnerships (P3s) have emerged as a way for public and private sector entities to align on the provision of assets and the delivery of services and then effectively manage that partnership. To assemble the most successful P3 project teams, contractors should:

•Build your expertise through strategic joint ventures. Pick your partners carefully.

•Plan comprehensively for project complexities. Be smart about your business decisions.

•Understand the cost and risk barriers to entry. You need deep pockets and a thick skin.

•Have a deep understanding of an owner’s “ecosystem.”

•Start building relationships with public officials and finance representatives now.

•Collaborate and innovate.

Related Stories

| Aug 11, 2010

AIA Course: Enclosure strategies for better buildings

Sustainability and energy efficiency depend not only on the overall design but also on the building's enclosure system. Whether it's via better air-infiltration control, thermal insulation, and moisture control, or more advanced strategies such as active façades with automated shading and venting or novel enclosure types such as double walls, Building Teams are delivering more efficient, better performing, and healthier building enclosures.

| Aug 11, 2010

Glass Wall Systems Open Up Closed Spaces

Sectioning off large open spaces without making everything feel closed off was the challenge faced by two very different projects—one an upscale food market in Napa Valley, the other a corporate office in Southern California. Movable glass wall systems proved to be the solution in both projects.

| Aug 11, 2010

High School in a Hurry

One of the more compelling arguments for charter schools is their theoretical ability to streamline decision making. Eliminate all those layers of bureaucratic fat that clog the arteries of most public school systems, the argument goes, and decisions can be made to flow much more smoothly, even when it comes to designing and building a major school project.

| Aug 11, 2010

Right-Sizing Healthcare

Over the past 30 years or so, the healthcare industry has quietly super-sized its healthcare facilities. Since 1980, ORs have bulked up in size by 53%, acute-care patient rooms by 77%. The slow creep went unlabeled until recently, when consultant H. Scot Latimer applied the super-sizing moniker to hospitals, inpatient rooms, operating rooms, and other treatment and administrative spaces.

| Aug 11, 2010

Silver Award: Pere Marquette Depot Bay City, Mich.

For 38 years, the Pere Marquette Depot sat boarded up, broken down, and fire damaged. The Prairie-style building, with its distinctive orange iron-brick walls, was once the elegant Bay City, Mich., train station. The facility, which opened in 1904, served the Flint and Pere Marquette Railroad Company when the area was the epicenter of lumber processing for the shipbuilding and kit homebuilding ...

| Aug 11, 2010

Special Recognition: Durrant Group Headquarters, Dubuque, Iowa

Architecture firm Durrant Group used the redesign of its $3.7 million headquarters building as a way to showcase the firm's creativity, design talent, and technical expertise as well as to create a laboratory for experimentation and education. The Dubuque, Iowa, firm's stated desire was to set a high sustainability standard for both itself and its clients by recycling a 22,890-sf downtown buil...

| Aug 11, 2010

Hilton President Hotel

Once an elegant and fashionably trendy locale, the Presidential Hotel played host to the 1928 Republican National Convention where Herbert Hoover was nominated for President, and acted as a hot spot for Kansas City Jazz in the '30s and '40s. The hotel was eventually abandoned in 1984, at which point it became a haven for vagabonds and pigeons, collecting animal waste and incurring significant s...

| Aug 11, 2010

Bowing to Tradition

As the home to Harvard's Hasty Pudding Theatricals—the oldest theatrical company in the nation—12 Holyoke Street had its share of opening nights. In April 2002, however, the Faculty of Arts and Sciences decided the 1888 Georgian Revival building no longer met the needs of the company and hired Boston-based architect Leers Weinzapfel Associates to design a more contemporary facility.

| Aug 11, 2010

AIA course: MEP Technologies For Eco-Effective Buildings

Sustainable building trends are gaining steam, even in the current economic downturn. More than five billion square feet of commercial space has either been certified by the U.S. Green Building Council under its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design program or is registered with LEED. It is projected that the green building market's dollar value could more than double by 2013, to as muc...

| Aug 11, 2010

BIM adoption tops 80% among the nation's largest AEC firms, according to BD+C's Giants 300 survey

The nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction companies are on the BIM bandwagon in a big way, according to Building Design+Construction's premier Top 50 BIM Adopters ranking, published as part of the 2009 Giants 300 survey. Of the 320 AEC firms that participated in Giants survey, 83% report having at least one BIM seat license in house, half have more than 30 seats, and near...

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category



Giants 400

Top 75 Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, WSP, Tetra Tech, Langan, and IMEG head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.


halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021