flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

The Big Room concept: Using Building Team collocation to ensure project success

The Big Room concept: Using Building Team collocation to ensure project success

Implementing collocation via the Big Room concept will remove silos, promote collaboration, and elevate your chances for success.


By Stephen Powell and Magnus Nilsson, CBRE Healthcare | September 30, 2014

In the ever changing world of technology and innovation, we now have tools that are designed to increase our productivity and communication. This move toward a “world is flat” format of conducting business is constantly evolving and thus  communication and collaboration must continually be enhanced. 

Capital facility projects will always require expertise from either local specialists or industry leaders within a specific field. Forming a collaborative environment and cohesive team, due to potential location and cost issues, can be challenging at best. Only by harnessing the opportunities available through technology and processes will project team members increase their chances for establishing cohesiveness to ensure project success. 

 

THE LOCKER ROOM CONCEPT

Keeping with the “world is flat” format of conducting business, it is not uncommon for a capital facility project to have nonlocal team members involved from remote cities. Obviously, having all local contractors would be ideal, but the skill and expertise required for a multimillion dollar healthcare project is not always available locally. Identifying opportunities for team interaction that provide the most value to the client is critical to project success. 

For example, projects typically provide onsite offices with various meeting rooms, yet these spaces do little to accommodate and promote a true team atmosphere. Wouldn’t it make sense to create an environment where all “players” on the team could collocate, similar to a football locker room? 

Imagine applying the team locker room concept and dynamics to the design and construction of a building project, thus creating a "Project Big Room." Much like a football team in a locker room developing their game plan for an upcoming season, the entire project team (architect, engineers, contractors, and subcontractors) could use a similar philosophy and approach to design, plan, and construct a capital project. 

 

 

Collocating in a Big Room environment fosters collaborative behavior that encourages brainstorming and innovation. Teams within the Big Room can be broken into position groups, much like linebackers and quarterbacks. Groups focused on various aspects of the project such as site, mechanical, structural, interiors, enclosure, etc., are formed, very early on, to tackle different issues and challenges. Each group is tasked with identifying solutions to reduce time, waste, and cost to the benefit of the project. 

For example, by working together early in the process, the enclosure group can eliminate duplication of efforts. Instead of the architect developing detailed drawings that would then be altered or redone by the fabricator, they merely complete concept drawings which are shared with the group and then the fabricator completes the detailed design. All meetings and interactions take place in the common space that is shared with the other groups thus opening the lines of communication and input. 

A meeting cadence is established to ensure team members are communicating on a daily basis, whether in person or by phone, as opposed to once or twice a month. 

If you are thinking this sounds a lot like integrated project delivery, you are right. But, the Big Room does not require an Integrated Form of Agreement. It  harnesses the philosophy and culture without the contract. 

 

GAME WEEK

Interaction in the Big Room would be structured very similar to preparations for the game of the week. An onsite team meeting is scheduled for the beginning of the week to help structure the goals and activities ahead. This meeting allows the various groups to report on their progress and to share their ideas for the upcoming week. It is imperative that the entire group understand how their individual parts fit into the bigger picture and to collaborate to achieve efficiencies. From there, teams “huddle” each morning for five or 10 minutes to touch base and stay informed.

One of the tools used in the Big Room to create the master schedule is Pull Planning. A Pull Planning session outlines all activities to enable a global perspective of each group’s responsibilities. Scheduling, utilizing Pull Planning, requires establishing specific milestones and then pulling back from identified dates to generate event timelines. This method of scheduling is challenging at first, but after practicing, the expectations of pulling rather than pushing toward a milestone start to drive out waste in your project schedule. With a milestone schedule and a pull plan in place, the teams can then work through their tasks and resolve any issues in their focused groups. 

An additional tool that is helpful in a Big Room structure is the use of A3 methodology for issue resolution and decision making. An A3 is a “Lean” tool used to conduct a thorough analysis of a current state. It helps to create a one-page story on a specific topic or issue that makes it easy for any member of the entire team to read and understand what the group is working to resolve. Regularly posting A3 documents on the walls of the Big Room is a great way to create further collaboration across different focused groups. An example of the value of an A3 is apparent when analyzing the benefits of different building materials on a project. 

 

 

Referring back to our previously mentioned Enclosure group, an A3 could be used to evaluate brick verses glass curtain wall for the building exterior. The A3, created by the enclosure group, would be reviewed by the structural group to determine cost savings or impact between the two. While the enclosure group feels there are advantages to choosing brick, the structural group identifies the disadvantages due to the added weight and required supports that would drive up the cost on their scope of work. 

Other groups also have the opportunity to provide input prior to final decision making. The goal is to allow the A3 to tell a story that ultimately identifies a solution that balances value, cost, and innovation.

As teams outline challenges and identify steps for resolution, A3’s are posted so other groups that may be impacted by these changes can review the plan and react if necessary. These discussions save design effort, improve the quality of the project, and ultimately deliver a savings to the project. During the entire planning week, each group strategizes in the Big Room and posts their progress which enhances collaboration much more so than meeting behind closed doors. 

At the end of the week, a meeting similar to a final walk through before the big game is conducted. Each group presents their weekly accomplishments and discusses any remaining obstacles. A final report presented to client leadership provides insight as to potential changes or project savings.

During planning, it can be determined how much repetition is needed on the project. For example, maybe the entire team is brought together in-person every other week or maybe just once a month. One nice feature of using a “flat business” platform is that technology has created ways for teams to have a Big Room that conceivably meets every week, alternating in-person and virtual meetings. You can keep the same group structure and meeting cadence whether in-person or through conference calls and web conferencing. 

While in-person meetings are more effective, keeping the cadence of the group planning virtually creates a stronger focus on the project and in turn makes the in-person team meetings run more smoothly. The true goal of this collaborative focus is to huddle daily and meet every week with an entire team focused on accomplishing as much as possible during the time the groups are together in the Big Room.  

 

CONCLUSION

On a major capital facility project, team performance can make or break the ultimate outcome. Engaging the most knowledgeable experts and skilled talent is critical in delivering the most value to the client. However, these vital team members may not be locally based which can pose challenges due to onsite availability. 

Implementing collocation via the Big Room concept will remove silos, ensure a cadence for daily communication, promote collaboration and elevate your chances for success. When setting up your next project, you may want to consult your favorite football team’s gameday strategy for inspiration. 

About the Authors
Stephen Powell is a Consultant and Magnus Nilsson is Senior Consultant with CBRE Healthcare.

Related Stories

| May 9, 2012

Shepley Bulfinch given IIDA Design award for Woodruff Library?

The design challenges included creating an entry sequence to orient patrons and highlight services; establishing a sense of identity visible from the exterior; and providing a flexible extended-hours access for part of the learning commons.

| May 9, 2012

Construction Defect Symposium will examine strategies for reducing litigation costs

July event in Key West will target decision makers in the insurance and construction industries.

| May 8, 2012

WDMA and AAMA release window, door & skylight market studies

Historic data for 2006 through 2011 and forecast data for 2012 through 2015 are included in the report.

| May 8, 2012

Study presents snapshot of domestic violence shelter services

Unique partnership of architects and domestic violence advocates brings new strategies for emergency housing.

| May 8, 2012

Gensler & J.C. Anderson team for pro bono high school project in Chicago

City Year representatives came to Gensler for their assistance in the transformation of the organization’s offices within Orr Academy High School, which also serve as an academic and social gathering space for students and corps members.

| May 8, 2012

Skanska USA hires Zamrowski as senior project manager

In his new role at Skanska, Zamrowski will serve as the day-to-day on-site contact for select Pennsylvania-based projects during all phases of construction.

| May 8, 2012

Morgan/Harbour completes three projects at Columbia Centre

Projects completed on behalf of property owner, White Oak Realty Partners, LLC, Pearlmark Realty Partners, LLC and Angelo Gordon & Co.

| May 7, 2012

BIM in the academy

Lessons for the AEC industry.

| May 7, 2012

4 more trends in higher-education facilities

Our series on college buildings continues with a look at new classroom designs, flexible space, collaboration areas, and the evolving role of the university library.

| May 7, 2012

Best AEC Firms: MHTN Architects nine decades of dedication to Utah

This 65-person design firm has served Salt Lake City and the state of Utah for the better part of 90 years.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

Laboratories

The Department of Energy breaks ground on the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center

In Princeton, N.J., the U.S. Department of Energy’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has broken ground on the Princeton Plasma Innovation Center (PPIC), a state-of-the-art office and laboratory building. Designed and constructed by SmithGroup, the $109.7 million facility will provide space for research supporting PPPL’s expanded mission into microelectronics, quantum sensors and devices, and sustainability sciences. 




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021