flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Common EIFS failures, and how to prevent them

Common EIFS failures, and how to prevent them

Poor workmanship, impact damage, building movement, and incompatible or unsound substrate are among the major culprits of EIFS problems. 

By Arthur L. Sanders & Benjamin J. Robinson, Hoffmann Architects | March 20, 2014
To true the wall surface, the installer should level the insulation board, rathe
To true the wall surface, the installer should level the insulation board, rather than build up the base coat. Checking stud ali

Editor's note: This article was originally published as part of an AIA/CES Discovery course: "EIFS: How to succeed with exterior insulation and finish systems." Take this free course at BDCUniversity.com.


Originally, EIFS was designed as a “perfect barrier” system; that is, one which provides waterproofing protection at the exterior face of the cladding. The idea of barrier cladding assemblies is to create a face-sealed façade that repels moisture to keep the building dry.

Unfortunately, barrier systems are rarely perfect. All it takes to compromise water tightness is a small breach in the exterior finish, such as a crack due to expansion, sealant failure at joints, or impact damage. Once water finds its way into a barrier system, it usually can’t find its way back out. Water trapped in the wall can lead to leaks, wet substrate, mold, deterioration of building components, and, eventually, collapse of the weakened cladding.

Any number of deficiencies can lead to EIFS failure. The major culprits are poor workmanship, damp climate, impact damage, building movement, and incompatible or unsound substrate.


How to avoid poor workmanship

There are numerous opportunities for installation errors and poor workmanship to ruin an EIFS job.

Sealant joints are a major source of problems with EIFS cladding. Incorrect selection or application of sealants, or missing sealants, provides an easy path for water entry and premature deterioration. Inappropriate sealant may even lead to cohesive failure of the EIFS finish coat. Sealant erroneously applied to the finish coat, rather than to the mesh-reinforced base coat, is a common source of problems.


Invasive probes, including test cuts of existing EIFS cladding, can uncover hidden deterioration conditions. A seemingly impervious exterior may mask wet or crumbling wall board beneath the surface. Image courtesy Hoffmann Architects


Flashings that are incorrectly installed or missing provide a conduit for water infiltration. Door and window openings should incorporate flashings to direct water away from headers and sills. At roof/wall intersections, drip-edge flashings should be installed to channel rainwater away from the wall face.

Base coat thicknesses that don’t meet the manufacturer’s guidelines are another source of trouble for EIFS façades. A base coat that is too thin provides insufficient waterproofing protection, whereas a base coat that is too thick may lead to cracking.

Reinforcing mesh that reads through at joint edges or terminations can indicate inadequate coating thickness. Alternatively, the mesh may have been insufficiently embedded in the base coat. Continuing the mesh-reinforced base coat around to the back of the insulation board, known as “backwrapping,” is critical to providing continuous waterproofing protection at edges, penetrations, and terminations. Where appropriate, factory-formed track may be used at foundation terminations instead of backwrapping.

Aesthetic joints (V-grooves) that align with insulation board joints can lead to cracks as the building moves. Mesh-reinforced base coat should be continuous at recessed features.


At the corners of windows, doors, and louvers, EIFS design should incorporate butterfly reinforcement, with diagonal pieces of mesh that provide additional reinforcing and prevent cracking. Image courtesy Hoffmann Architects


Window and door corners, like aesthetic joints, should not align with insulation board joints. “Butterfly” reinforcement, whereby rectangular pieces of reinforcing mesh are laid diagonally at the corners of windows, doorways, and other openings, is important to preventing cracking.

Expansion joints are too often neglected in EIFS construction, but they are no less critical here than with other types of cladding. Expansion joints should be used:
• At changes in building height
• At areas of anticipated movement
• At floor lines (particularly for wood frame construction)
• Where the substrate changes
• Where prefabricated panels abut one another
• At intersections with dissimilar materials
• Where expansion joints exist in the substrate or supporting construction

Insulation board should not bridge expansion joints in masonry or concrete substrates. Instead, an expansion joint should be created in the EIFS insulation over the underlying joint. Insulation board should meet the manufacturer’s recommended minimum thickness (usually 3/4 inch), even at aesthetic joints and recesses. Vertical joints in the insulation should be staggered in a running bond pattern in successive courses, with boards abutted tightly to one another.

Gaps between boards should never be filled with base coat or adhesive, which can cause cracking; rather, slivers of insulation may be wedged between boards where needed. Selecting a board adhesive that is compatible with both the insulation and the substrate is critical to successful performance of EIFS.


This infrared thermographic scan reveals trapped moisture at insulation board joints. Image courtesy Hoffmann Architects


Deal with climate factors 

A humid climate with limited drying potential can devastate some EIFS assemblies, particularly when the rate of wetting exceeds the rate of drying. Poor design and installation exacerbate this problem by providing avenues for water to penetrate the cladding, while the humidity prevents damp walls from drying out.

The amount of rain deposited on a wall is dependent not only on climate, but also on the architecture and siting of the structure. Building height, overhangs, exposure, and façade details all affect the path of rainfall, channeling more or less moisture toward the cladding.

Cold climates may also lead to premature failure, particularly when EIFS coatings are applied at temperatures below the manufacturer’s design range.


Guard EIFS against impact

EIFS assemblies consist of a thin, brittle coating over a soft substrate and are easily damaged by impact. Holes, dents, or scrapes can lead to water infiltration, so it’s prudent to provide extra reinforcement at susceptible locations.

Areas needing impact protection should use heavy-duty mesh, usually 12 to 20 ounces, rather than standard 4.5-ounce mesh. For outside corners, the design professional may specify a heavier corner mesh to guard against excess wear and damage. Intricate decorative elements require a lightweight, flexible detail mesh, which conforms to fine contours and ornamental details while still providing some measure of impact protection.


Impact damage that is not repaired promptly provides a pathway for leaks. Image courtesy Hoffmann Architects


Account for building movement

Wood substrates tend to exhibit cross-grain shrinking, along with expansion and contraction from changes in humidity. For concrete, movement tends to come in the form of frame shortening, whereby concrete deforms over time due to shrinkage and creep. Steel structures are not immune to the effects of building movement, particularly at long-span beams, where transverse forces are greatest and deflection more likely. To prevent irregular cracking, sufficient provision for expansion and control joints should be part of your design.


Avoid use of incompatible or unsound substrate

Poor quality control in the production of oriented strand board (OSB), a common substrate for EIFS, has raised concerns about premature failure, so use a reputable manufacturer with a good track record. Gypsum board, often used with EIFS, tends to exhibit problems with moisture absorption, so avoid using it in damp or humid climates. Even if the substrate is of high quality and suitable for the building location, failure to correctly specify or install substrate attachment may lead to premature cladding problems.

Related Stories

Airports | Apr 18, 2024

The next destination: Passive design airports

Today, we can design airports that are climate resilient, durable, long-lasting, and healthy for occupants—we can design airports using Passive House standards.

Airports | Feb 13, 2024

New airport terminal by KPF aims to slash curb-to-gate walking time for passengers

The new Terminal A at Zayed International Airport in the United Arab Emirates features an efficient X-shape design with an average curb-to-gate walking time of just 12 minutes. The airport terminal was designed by Kohn Pedersen Fox (KPF), with Arup and Naco as engineering leads.

Urban Planning | Feb 5, 2024

Lessons learned from 70 years of building cities

As Sasaki looks back on 70 years of practice, we’re also looking to the future of cities. While we can’t predict what will be, we do know the needs of cities are as diverse as their scale, climate, economy, governance, and culture.

Products and Materials | Jan 31, 2024

Top building products for January 2024

BD+C Editors break down January's top 15 building products, from SloanStone Quartz Molded Sinks to InvisiWrap SA housewrap.

Airports | Jan 30, 2024

Rafael Viñoly Architects’ design for the new Florence, Italy, airport terminal will feature a rooftop vineyard

At Florence, Italy’s Aeroporto Amerigo Vespucci, the new international airport terminal will feature a fully operating vineyard on the facility’s rooftop. Designed by Rafael Viñoly Architects, the terminal is expected to see over 5.9 million passengers annually. Renderings for the project have recently been released.

Airports | Jan 15, 2024

How to keep airports functional during construction

Gensler's aviation experts share new ideas about how to make the airport construction process better moving forward.

Airports | Dec 4, 2023

4 key innovations and construction trends across airport design

Here are some of the key trends Skanska is seeing in the aviation sector, from congestion solutions to sustainability.

Giants 400 | Nov 13, 2023

Top 60 Airport Facility Construction Firms for 2023

Hensel Phelps, Turner Construction, AECOM, and Walsh Group top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest airport terminal and airport facilities general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. 

Giants 400 | Nov 13, 2023

Top 65 Airport Facility Engineering Firms for 2023

AECOM, Jacobs, Arup, Burns & McDonnell, and WSP head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest airport terminal and airport facilities engineering and engineering architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 13, 2023

Top 65 Airport Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, Corgan, PGAL, and HOK top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest airport terminal and airport facilities architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. 

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021