flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Justice league: United States courthouse

Building Team Awards

Justice league: United States courthouse

Gold Award: The Building Team for L.A.’s newest courthouse went way beyond what was expected.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | June 7, 2017

The Building Team made extensive use of mockups to sort out interior details and materials. Bruce Damonte Photography.

This cube-like, 10-story, 240-foot-tall tower seems to hover over the ground as if it were a sculpture on a pedestal. The Building Team created this floating effect with a cantilevered perimeter consisting of 24 columns, each 42 inches in diameter, supported by a 600-ton truss system nine stories above. 

The design-build process facilitated this effort by involving the construction team early in the design phase. For example, those meetings came up with a practical truss scheme inspired by the concentric properties of a wagon wheel. 

Consistent owner and Building Team collaboration on this project included a formal partnering program, facilitated by a third-party consultant. Seven full-day workshops were held over the course of the project, at which team members established shared expectations and objectives.

 

A 600-ton truss system above supports the tower’s cantilevered perimeter, and helped the Building Team create the effect that the cube-shaped building is floating above the ground. Bruce Damonte Photography.

 

To keep the project on budget without a loss of quality, the Building Team made extensive use of functional mockups to review finishing materials, details, and lighting throughout the facility’s 24 courtrooms and 32 judicial chambers. Other procedures led to innovative value-engineering solutions, such as using soil-cement columns instead of deep foundations. 

The owner wanted to reduce the project’s annual energy outcome to 35 kBtu/sf, from the original goal of 47 kBtu/sf. That effort, dubbed “Drive for 35,” led to a six-week brainstorming session. To ensure team members were vested in the outcome, Clark, SOM, Syska, and the major MEP subs agreed to share the risk of payment for this work by tying the goal to contractually guaranteed performance.

 

Building Team — Submitting firm, general contractor Clark Construction Group–California Owner, developer General Services Administration Architect, structural engineer Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Mechanical/electrical engineer Syska Hennessy Group Plumbing engineer South Coast Engineering Group Construction manager Jacobs

General Information — Size 633,000 sf Cost $343 million Construction time January 2013 to August 2016 Delivery method Design-build

 

Return to the 2017 Building Team Awards landing page

Related Stories

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

IPD-driven fusion facility serves science and student life in Chicago

In dire need of modern science labs and a student union, North Park University built both—in the same building.

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

‘Prudent, not opulent’ sets the tone for this Catholic hospital

This Building Team stuck with a project for seven years to get a new hospital built for a faithful client.

Building Team Awards | Apr 9, 2015

9/11 museum triumphs over controversy

The Building Team for this highly visible project had much more than design, engineering, and construction problems to deal with.

Building Team Awards | Apr 7, 2015

Unique test facility will help make wind power more feasible

A new facility at Clemson University makes it possible to test the huge stresses that large-scale wind turbines must be able to withstand.

Building Team Awards | Apr 5, 2015

UK's leading foot and mouth disease lab turns containment design inside out

A daring Building Team breaks the bunker mentality common to research containment with this light-filled, open facility in the English countryside.

Building Team Awards | Apr 5, 2015

‘Project first’ philosophy shows team’s commitment to a true IPD on the San Carlos Center

Skanska and NBBJ join forces with Sutter Health on a medical center project where all three parties share the risk.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021