flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
Currently Reading

Putting the Metal to the Petal

Putting the Metal to the Petal

Steel construction using BIM enabled the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine's flowering design to be constructed on time and within budget.


By By Jay W. Schneider, Senior Editor | August 11, 2010
This article first appeared in the 200909 issue of BD+C.
Design for the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine is representative
of a flower in bloom, complete with petals that shelter the circular exhibit space. The center connects to the Bennett Katz Library.
Photos: Shepley Bullfinch

The Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine was founded in 1985, but the organization didn't have a permanent home until May 2008. That's when the Michael Klahr Center, which houses the HHRC, opened on the Augusta campus of the University of Maine.

The design, by Boston-based architects Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott, was selected from among more than 200 entries in a university-sponsored competition. The winning project, a conceptualized flower in bloom, was created by a group of young architects at Shepley Bulfinch who imagined four petal-like forms growing out of the ground—symbolic of the seeds of democracy and freedom.

“There are still so many human rights issues out there today, so the flower blossoms are representative of new life coming back when conditions are right,” says Angela Watson, a principal at Shepley Bulfinch and mentor to the young architects.

The Building Team utilized BIM to check the demands and capabilities of
the petal forms and determine the proper petal radii, which cut the cost
of bending the shell steel by half. The finished petals are clad in copper.

It was Watson who introduced the HHRC project to the firm. When she learned of the University of Maine's design competition back in 2004, she organized a separate in-house competition as a way to give the firm's young bloods a chance to “flex their design muscles,” as she put it. The entire firm voted, and the two winning designs were entered in the HHRC competition, with one taking the prize.

At 6,300 sf, the Michael Klahr Center isn't a large building. The space is apportioned throughout a single level that includes a circular exhibit space in the center as well as offices and education space. However, its sculptural forms were complex enough for the Building Team, which included structural engineer Simpson Gumpertz and Heger of Waltham, Mass., to experiment with BIM.

Not a big deal now, but BIM was fairly new in 2004 when design began, turning this project into a BIM pilot for Shepley Bulfinch. The Building Team used BIM to explore many different construction options, including cast-in-place concrete, glulam wood beams, and steel. They found that cast-in-place would push the project over the $1.8 million budget cap and glulam would make the petals too thick. Their BIM model helped them decide that steel framework was the most efficient and economical solution.

Steel construction enabled some portions of the building to be shop fabricated, which saved time. General contractor Wright-Ryan Construction, Portland, Maine, cut construction time even more by framing large portions of the small building using wide-flange noncomposite steel beams and columns, with the lateral load system consisting of structural steel concentrically braced frames with hollow structural section (HSS) brace members.

But it was the complex design of the steel petals that really tested the Building Team's mettle.

The SGH structural engineering team developed an innovative structural system that consisted of a grid of HSS sections using curved HSS 8x8s as the ribs along the meridians of the spherical sections of the petals and straight HSS 4x4s along the parallels of latitude of the pedals. The HSS grids, braced and moment-connected in-plane, allowed the petals to act as shells. Three-inch-diameter structural steel columns pierced the petals and provided additional structural support. The BIM model enabled the team to check the demands and capabilities of the petals and determine the proper petal radii, which cut the cost of bending the shell steel by half.

Wood-framed box beams (made of 2x4s and plywood) were incorporated into the spans between the rib framing; this allowed the four petals to be sheathed in plywood, over which the standing seam copper roof panels were installed.

“This building is the perfect story,” says Watson. “It's a unique design from a young, talented team that overcame challenges of budget, schedule, and material and created a place that will have lasting impact.”

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 90 Construction Management Firms for 2022

CBRE, Alfa Tech, Jacobs, and Hill International head the rankings of the nation's largest construction management (as agent) and program/project management firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 200 Contractors for 2022

Turner Construction, STO Building Group, Whiting-Turner, and DPR Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest general contractors, CM at risk firms, and design-builders for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 45 Engineering Architecture Firms for 2022

Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and Burns & McDonnell top the rankings of the nation's largest engineering architecture (EA) firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022

Top 80 Engineering Firms for 2022

Kimley-Horn, Tetra Tech, Langan, and NV5 head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 21, 2022

Top 110 Architecture/Engineering Firms for 2022

Stantec, HDR, HOK, and Skidmore, Owings & Merrill top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 20, 2022

Top 180 Architecture Firms for 2022

Gensler, Perkins and Will, HKS, and Perkins Eastman top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Aug 19, 2022

2022 Giants 400 Report: Tracking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms

Now 46 years running, Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report rankings the largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. This year a record 519 AEC firms participated in BD+C's Giants 400 report. The final report includes more than 130 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories. 

Cultural Facilities | Aug 5, 2022

A time and a place: Telling American stories through architecture

As the United States enters the year 2026, it will commence celebrating a cycle of Sestercentennials, or 250th anniversaries, of historic and cultural events across the land.

Museums | Jun 28, 2022

The California Science Center breaks grounds on its Air and Space Center

The California Science Center—a hands-on science center in Los Angeles—recently broke ground on its Samuel Oschin Air and Space Center.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

Giants 400

Top 90 Construction Management Firms for 2022

CBRE, Alfa Tech, Jacobs, and Hill International head the rankings of the nation's largest construction management (as agent) and program/project management firms for nonresidential and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.


Giants 400

Top 200 Contractors for 2022

Turner Construction, STO Building Group, Whiting-Turner, and DPR Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest general contractors, CM at risk firms, and design-builders for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.


Giants 400

Top 45 Engineering Architecture Firms for 2022

Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and Burns & McDonnell top the rankings of the nation's largest engineering architecture (EA) firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.


Giants 400

Top 80 Engineering Firms for 2022

Kimley-Horn, Tetra Tech, Langan, and NV5 head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

 



Magazine Subscription
Subscribe

Get our Newsletters

Each day, our editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe

Follow BD+C: