Currently Reading

Masters of geometry

Curtain Wall

Masters of geometry

Three firms that specialize in façades that curve, twist, and turn see themselves as artisans of the unthinkable.

By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | April 11, 2017

The Petersen Automotive Museum, Los Angeles. A. Zahner fabricated the 308 stainless steel ribbons using its patented ZEPPS process. Photo: ©A. Zahner Co. 

Bill Kreysler doesn’t pursue projects that are “flat.” His company, Kreysler & Associates, is one of a small band of curtain wall designers, engineers, and fabricators that provides AEC clients the wherewithal to execute complex—some previously unthinkable—façade geometries.

Prominent examples of their work include the sweeping postmodern structures imagined by Frank Gehry, skeletal-like structures fancied by Santiago Calatrava, and the rippled exterior panels on the addition to the Snøhetta-designed San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA).

These façade experts—Kreysler, Enclos, and A. Zahner—have positioned themselves as artisans that can turn just about any vision into reality. 

“One of the biggest problems for architects is general contractors and owners saying no to complexity,” says Gary Davis, Director of Marketing for Zahner in Kansas City, Mo. “We focus on rationalizing the models so they are doable.” 

Enclos views itself as the middleman between the designer and the contractor to get projects to the point where they are buildable. Its recent work includes two New York City projects: the controversial Santiago Calatrava–designed World Trade Center transit hub, with its massive oculus pavilion and winged-dove contour; and the pyramid-shaped Via 57 West residential building, designed by Bjarke Ingels Group.

“Our job is often to introduce ‘constraints’ that make things constructable, but we’ll move as far forward as the design team lets us,” says Jeff Vaglio, PhD, PE, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, Vice President of Enclos’s Advanced Technology Studio, in Los Angeles. This intramural think tank is staffed with a multidisciplinary team of architects, designers, engineers, programmers, and visualization specialists.

Vaglio says Enclos has found the design-assist delivery model to its liking, with the stipulation that “if we can meet a budget, we can build it. We’re not interested in being a design service; we’re builders.”


The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art expansion. Façade fabricated by Snøhetta, Kreysler, and Enclos. 


key factors: Schedules and funding

To be a leader in complex façade design and fabrication means staying at the leading edge of technology. Kreysler & Associates built its first CNC milling machine in 1985 to create large-scale sculptures based on 3D laser scans. (The artist Claes Oldenburg was one of their earliest clients.) 

Zahner has nine patents and five others pending. These include its Zahner Engineered Profiled Panel System (ZEPPS) for the construction of curvilinear and other complex façade systems. “Our goal is to produce museum-quality edges in our work,” says Davis.

Enclos was experimenting with 3D printing as early as 2009. “We use it to model full-scale details of key connections, as well as to scale whole building models for our construction crews to visualize access for installation, maintenance, and replacement,” says Vaglio. “These are great communication pieces. Seeing a detail in a model is priceless and eliminates any confusion that might arise. And we can test fit the function of aluminum parts, since the 3D printer’s tolerance is nearly identical to that of the aluminum extrusion process.”

Enclos focuses on the process of creating shapes its clients want. Some concerns that complex façades present, says Vaglio, include:

  • Warpage, which can occur when a complex surface geometry is subdivided into panels or modules.
  • Moldability of the material being used.
  • Variability, as in how much repetition is in the building envelope so that every panel doesn’t need to be reinvented. 

These factors will add time and cost to a project. “But what’s not changing are the schedules we’re being held to,” Vaglio quips.

Realistic scheduling and sufficient budgeting are factors that Zahner considers, too, before diving into any assignment. The complexity of a project’s exterior design is much less of an obstacle these days, says Davis, because of the sophistication of available modeling software. 

Zahner uses metal for all of its work. The fabricator eschews composites, partly because they aren’t recyclable. Davis points to two recent projects whose complex façades stand out:

  • The 135,000-sf Petersen Automotive Museum, Los Angeles, which underwent a $125 million renovation in 2015. Its design, by Kohn Pedersen Fox, features a stainless steel ribbon assembly made from 100 tons of 14-gauge steel in 308 sections, 25 supports, and 140,000 custom stainless steel screws. Davis notes that every façade piece is unique, and none of the pieces touches the ground. Zahner employed several of its patented technologies on this project, among them Angel Hair Surface, which softens the reflexivity of stainless steel finishes, and ImageWall, which creates custom-perforated metal imagery.
  • The River at Grace Farms, New Canaan, Conn., a single undulating aluminum roof that unites a sanctuary, library, court, commons, and pavilion. Zahner worked with Sanaa, a Tokyo-based architect with a reputation for bold, complex design, and Handel Architects. The result, says Davis, “is almost a surreal element” on the site. 

Kreysler & Associates is something of a outlier, as it uses composites exclusively for complex façades it fabricates at its 30,000-sf shop in American Canyon, Calif. Kreysler says he became acquainted with composites while working for a boat-building company. When he started his own business, his first jobs were sets for operas and films. One of his first construction-related projects was making a composite replica of a building ornament that originally was made from terra cotta.


BIG-designed Via 57 West, New York; façade fabricated by Enclos. Photo: © Tom Dobbins / Enclos.


composites vs. metals vs. concrete: finding the right material for the job

Kreysler prefers composites to metal, which he asserts can’t be formed into complex shapes. He likes composites for their flexibility, strength, and durability. He says his firm can create a 3/8-inch-thick composite façade panel that’s comparable in strength to a one-inch-thick concrete panel. 

While composites remain pricey, the cost gap with other materials is narrowing. Kreysler’s firm is currently working on a concrete structure in San Antonio that will cost $300/sf. If fiberglass had been used, he says, he could have brought the project in at one-third the cost.

Kreysler and Enclos joined forces on the 235,000-sf SFMOMA addition, which was the first multi-story commercial façade made from composites. This project was also the first where composites passed the National Fire Protection Association’s 285 Standard fire test for exterior non-load-bearing wall assemblies with combustible materials. Kreysler estimates that using composites added about 15% to the total cost of SFMOMA’s façade.

Davis says A. Zahner foresees increasing demand for the kind of esoteric façade work that is its stock in trade, as younger architects who aren’t intimidated by complexity come onto the scene. The firm also expects automation to play a bigger role in these projects. For example, Zahner is using robotics to manufacture custom-louvered architectural screen walls for the Cornell Tech Bloomberg Center campus on Roosevelt Island in New York, designed by Morphosis.

Vaglio says that “weird” in façade design doesn’t faze Enclos “because it has less competition.” The firm takes full advantage of software and parabolic tools that make design and fabrication easier to execute. But Vaglio observes that every project “seems to be getting bigger and heavier,” so Enclos is working to help its people in the field with production and installation. “We automate a lot,” says Vaglio, even though he still sees some “delusion” within the industry about the efficacy of “file to fabrication.”  

As it looks toward the future, Enclos wonders how many projects with complicated façade geometries there will be in the U.S., its primary market. More to the point, says Vaglio, what will it take to compete for bread-and-butter curtain wall assignments?

When BD+C spoke with Kreysler in mid-February, his 30-person shop was humming, with four active projects on the boards. He insists that his company isn’t interested in being in the mainstream cladding systems business. But last year, Kreysler hedged his bets when he and a former Autodesk executive launched Archways Digital, a business oriented toward offering technical advice to architects.

Related Stories

75 Top Building Products | Apr 22, 2024

Enter today! BD+C's 75 Top Building Products for 2024

BD+C editors are now accepting submissions for the annual 75 Top Building Products awards. The winners will be featured in the November/December 2024 issue of Building Design+Construction. 

75 Top Building Products | Dec 13, 2023

75 top building products for 2023

From a bladeless rooftop wind energy system, to a troffer light fixture with built-in continuous visible light disinfection, innovation is plentiful in Building Design+Construction's annual 75 Top Products report. 

Products and Materials | Oct 31, 2023

Top building products for October 2023

BD+C Editors break down 15 of the top building products this month, from structural round timber to air handling units.

Building Materials | Jun 14, 2023

Construction input prices fall 0.6% in May 2023

Construction input prices fell 0.6% in May compared to the previous month, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Producer Price Index data released today. Nonresidential construction input prices declined 0.5% for the month.

Cladding and Facade Systems | Jun 5, 2023

27 important questions about façade leakage

Walter P Moore’s Darek Brandt discusses the key questions building owners and property managers should be asking to determine the health of their building's façade.  

Design Innovation Report | Apr 27, 2023

BD+C's 2023 Design Innovation Report

Building Design+Construction’s Design Innovation Report presents projects, spaces, and initiatives—and the AEC professionals behind them—that push the boundaries of building design. This year, we feature four novel projects and one building science innovation.

Cladding and Facade Systems | Dec 20, 2022

Acoustic design considerations at the building envelope

Acentech's Ben Markham identifies the primary concerns with acoustic performance at the building envelope and offers proven solutions for mitigating acoustic issues.

Building Materials | Aug 3, 2022

Shawmut CEO Les Hiscoe on coping with a shaky supply chain in construction

BD+C's John Caulfield interviews Les Hiscoe, CEO of Shawmut Design and Construction, about how his firm keeps projects on schedule and budget in the face of shortages, delays, and price volatility.

Curtain Wall | Jan 13, 2020

YKK AP Launches Collaborative Research into Construction Technology with Carnegie Mellon University

Explores the use of robotics and technologies in fenestration products installation to help address global labor and construction challenges.

75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019

101 Top Products for 2019

Building Design+Construction readers and editors select their top building products for the past 12 months in the fourth-annual 101 Top Products report.


More In Category

Building Materials

Construction input prices fall 0.6% in May 2023

Construction input prices fell 0.6% in May compared to the previous month, according to an Associated Builders and Contractors analysis of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Producer Price Index data released today. Nonresidential construction input prices declined 0.5% for the month.


Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021