flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

How HOK achieved design consensus for London's Francis Crick Institute

Laboratories

How HOK achieved design consensus for London's Francis Crick Institute

HOK was as much mediator as it was architect and designer for the $931 million biomedical research center.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | June 16, 2016

Rendering courtesy HOK

HOK worked on the Francis Crick Institute for more than seven years. The firm was as much a mediator as it was the project’s architect and designer.

The 980,000-sf, $931 million facility is the result of a unique financing mechanism that brought together three of the U.K.’s heaviest funders of biomedical research—the Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, and the Wellcome Trust—and three leading universities—University College London, Imperial College London, and King’s College London.

“The Crick,” as it’s known, is organized into four “laboratory neighborhoods” that encourage multidisciplinary interaction among its 1,500 scientists. Offices and labs have floor-to-ceiling glazing. The facility is designed around two atria that allow visibility throughout the building and between floors.

David King, RIBA, Technical Principal for HOK’s London office, provides insider details about what it took to get the Francis Crick Institute from launch to completion.

According to King, the six partners that funded the institute had “different protocols and procedures, often different funding methods, and organizational structures.”

To build consensus about key expectations and outcomes, HOK established 12 main user groups, which HOK encouraged to focus on how the building’s operations would work in the future, and how best practices from other research facilities around the world could be incorporated.

“The fundamental challenge was whether the building would become home to six institutions sharing common facilities, or one institution made up of several constituents. Happily, it is the latter,” says King.

HOK also had to deal with outside forces that could have tied the project in knots. “The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, the Mayor of London, and Camden Council had widely differing views on how the building should look,” recalls King. Camden Council initially opposed the proposed development altogether, preferring to use the site for social housing.

PLP Architecture was appointed to the project because of its previous work with Camden’s planning department. “We worked with PLP to focus on the building’s envelope and outward expression in order to shape the building into a civic landmark that Camden would approve,” said King.

The solution: One-third of the structure is below ground level, and its curved roof design is meant to create a more inviting perspective for the surrounding community.

Over the course of the project, HOK retained at least seven other sub-consultants for their expertise in such areas as acoustics (Cole Jarman), lighting (Porkorny Lichtarchitektur), biological resource facilities (Boswell Mitchell & Johnson), shielding (VitaTech), building maintenance and systems access (REEF Associates), cladding (EPPAG), and computer graphics imagery (Glowfrog).

Related Stories

University Buildings | Jan 18, 2024

Houston’s Rice University opens the largest research facility on its core campus

Designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM), the 251,400-sf building provides students and researchers with state-of-the-art laboratories, classrooms, offices, and a cafe, in addition to multiple gathering spaces.

Healthcare Facilities | Jan 7, 2024

Two new projects could be economic catalysts for a central New Jersey city

A Cancer Center and Innovation district are under construction and expected to start opening in 2025 in New Brunswick.

Laboratories | Jan 5, 2024

Office conversions are helping to meet the growing demand for life-science space

Ware Malcomb and Rock Creek Property Group led the team that recently completed the adaptive reuse of two office buildings in Maryland.

Mass Timber | Jan 2, 2024

5 ways mass timber will reshape the design of life sciences facilities

Here are five reasons why it has become increasingly evident that mass timber is ready to shape the future of laboratory spaces. 

Giants 400 | Nov 28, 2023

Top 55 Laboratory Construction Firms for 2023

Whiting-Turner, DPR Construction, STO Building Group, Skanska, and Hensel Phelps top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest laboratory general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 28, 2023

Top 60 Laboratory Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers, Burns & McDonnell, Tetra Tech, and WSP head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest laboratory engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 28, 2023

Top 100 Laboratory Design Firms for 2023

HDR, Flad Architects, DGA, Elkus Manfredi Architects, and Gensler top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest laboratory architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 16, 2023

Top 80 Science + Technology Facility Construction Firms for 2023

DPR Construction, Austin Industries, Whiting-Turner, and Gilbane top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors revenue from all science and technology (S+T) buildings work, including laboratories, research buildings, technology/innovation buildings, pharmaceutical production facilities, and semiconductor production facilities.

Giants 400 | Nov 16, 2023

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, Fluor, SSOE, Tetra Tech, and Affiliated Engineers head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors revenue from all science and technology (S+T) buildings work, including laboratories, research buildings, technology/innovation buildings, pharmaceutical production facilities, and semiconductor production facilities.

Giants 400 | Nov 16, 2023

Top 100 Science + Technology Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, HDR, Page Southerland Page, Flad Architects, and DGA top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors revenue from all science and technology (S+T) buildings work, including laboratories, research buildings, technology/innovation buildings, pharmaceutical production facilities, and semiconductor production facilities.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category


Laboratories

HGA unveils plans to transform an abandoned rock quarry into a new research and innovation campus

In the coastal town of Manchester-by-the-Sea, Mass., an abandoned rock quarry will be transformed into a new research and innovation campus designed by HGA. The campus will reuse and upcycle the granite left onsite. The project for Cell Signaling Technology (CST), a life sciences technology company, will turn an environmentally depleted site into a net-zero laboratory campus, with building electrification and onsite renewables.



halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021