flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

How is the Value of VDC for Design Management Translating Outside the US?

Sponsored Content BIM and Information Technology

How is the Value of VDC for Design Management Translating Outside the US?

Sasha Reed | December 17, 2015

I thought it would be fitting to close out the year with a blog post that looks beyond our US perspective on BIM and Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) to see how US perspectives may be influencing firms overseas. At BIMForum in Orlando, I caught up with Sascha Vesterlund, a VDC Specialist, Design Processer with MT Højgaard and Nathan Wood, Innovation at DPR Construction. Both firms have a shared relationship through the CIFE program run by Martin Fischer at Stanford University.

With an international focus, the program aims to be the world's premier academic research center for VDC of AEC industry projects. Building on the conversations taking place here, Wood traveled to Denmark to work with Vesterlund and her team to take those ideas, challenges and solutions and use them to steer clear of roadblocks.

“It’s a great opportunity to be sharing between different contractors,” explained Wood. “Usually within an organization, you’ll see Architects and Contractors sharing across offices, but it’s not very often that you get to share between two people that sit on the same side of the table. And being in a completely different part of the world, there’s a different language, a different process and different rules—but we say the same about construction projects; every project is slightly different. I think even as you go internationally, you see more and more similarities along with those differences that sort of find those trends of really where we need to be focusing our early efforts to see the grassroots adoption take hold.”

Vesterlund shared some of the lessons learned in her presentation, “A Danish General Contractors Perspective on VDC Design Management.” Believing that “VDC stands on the shoulders of BIM,” Vesterlund said, “VDC for us is more of the process, making the collaborative environment around the project, inviting our project team members in-house, meeting up at specific points during the project, instead of meeting up the whole time. People need to come back and have their specialist conversations with their colleagues back home from their own companies. So we work in loops, with sprints within the process of VDC.”



Curious to understand what is incentivizing firms to migrate away from old methods to new, I asked how the government mandates play a role in all of this. Vesterlund explained, “Back in the 2000s, it was more of the Civil Engineers rolling the BIM agenda. But now it’s more of the construction industry doing it instead. Over the years, the government has stated some laws telling all the public construction projects to be built in certain ways with certain demands for the 3D models and all of the operational data afterwards.” She further explains how this has had a spillover effect on private developers as well. In turn, this has begun to “teach the owners of what they can get, what they think they should require, and what they might need.”

After spending two days at the conference, Vesterlund shared that her biggest lesson learned is that we are all on the same journey. “Despite the fact that we are different cultures and two sides of the world but there very much are similarities.” Wood’s takeaway from the experience is that “We’ve become more honest with ourselves. The realization of there is no easy button for this, I think it was said multiple times across the conferences. ‘That looks really complicated and it actually is – and then some.’… is very much the message that is getting out there.” And he goes on to say, “Many of those who did come into this with this perception of, ‘Oh, I just buy this technology and hit this button and everything will be fixed.’ They’ve had a lot of pain points and it’s good that they’re sharing those now so that we can learn from them and move forward.”

In listening to Vesterlund and Wood talk, it was clear that there is tremendous value gained in sharing success’ and failures alike. For many firms, selecting the right technology is only step one in the process.  Finding ways to leverage the past experience of others has a carryover effect, regardless of geographical or cultural differences. Hear Wood and Vesterlund tell their story in the video below. 


More from Author

Sasha Reed | Dec 15, 2017

Future vs. current state of construction innovation: How will we make the leap?

Looking beyond today’s constraints to the possibility of what “could be” is a key characteristic of those defining and delivering innovation to design and building firms across the globe.

Sasha Reed | Sep 19, 2017

BIM vs VDC…how the US and the UK differ in approaching digital project delivery

In this four-part series, Bluebeam VP Sasha Reed sat down with industry experts to examine the need for defining and understanding digital workflows and data management throughout the design and construction project lifecycle.

Sasha Reed | Jul 19, 2017

Introducing StrXur by Bluebeam

Our goal is to present unique perspectives you may not be able to find anywhere else.  

Sasha Reed | Jul 13, 2017

Defining the future by mastering the art of change

From my perspective, what separates organizations thriving in the digital revolution from those who are not boils down to one thing: leadership.

Sasha Reed | Mar 15, 2017

Incentivizing change: Show me the money

Who is succeeding, and on what terms? And what will it take for everyone to experience the benefits of that success?

Sasha Reed | Oct 4, 2016

The talent shortage: Will the training the AEC industry desperately needs arrive in time?

As the construction industry bounces back from the Great Recession, an entirely new class of tech-savvy construction professionals has been created, and the supply of these highly skilled, tech-proficient pros has been quickly exhausted. 

Sasha Reed | Jul 11, 2016

Construction Disruption at AECX: Technology, hackathons and the promise of change in LA

The lead up to AECX featured a discussion providing insight into the current state of the AEC technological revolution by exploring opportunities, challenges and choices AEC pros face.  

Sasha Reed | Jun 23, 2016

Implementing Change: The Five Biggest Mistakes to Avoid

Two truths from the jobsite: 1) The best part about uncovering a problem is discovering its solution, and 2) The worst part about discovering the solution is implementing it. 

Sasha Reed | Jun 9, 2016

With all these sharks in the water… (No Predictions Here...Part 2)

Rather than fighting to control the proliferation of apps, perhaps we should be training our eyes to look for signs of long-term viability among all the fins in the water

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021