flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
Currently Reading

How to build 'smart' teams


How to build 'smart' teams

By Julie Honeywell | Paladino | May 5, 2015
How to build 'smart' teams

Understanding the art and science of teams is vital to creating results for sustainability leaders. Image: Pixabay

Think about the work you do today: how much of your time is spent in team meetings, gathering teams, and motivating teams? Sustainability leaders often work with groups from diverse areas of their organization to create and execute programs that will meet enterprise-level goals. Thus, these leaders need to be able to quickly and efficiently create effective teams to build consensus and get results.

We all know the adage “two heads are better than one.” If that’s true, then why do we see teams of really smart people make really dumb decisions? Or why do we sit through painful meetings where no one speaks up, raises difficult issues, or solves any real problems? The process begins to feel like a merry-go-round – we believe we’re making progress as the horse rises up but are then frustrated when we realize we just go around in circles and never get ahead.

"Most of the time, a team will come together and jump right to the problem at hand. There is some result, decision, or discussion that needs to happen and the team immediately starts working on the problem.
Here’s the issue with this approach: only a few members of the team will actually contribute to the conversation." —Julie Honeywell, Paladino and Company

In a recent Harvard Business Review article, authors Cass Sunstein and Reid Hastie discuss research illustrating the two main reasons why teams go awry.

The first is incorrect informational signals: people generally learn from each other but may pick up on the wrong signals within a group. Instead of correcting the group error, it becomes amplified – if enough people in the group are doing the wrong thing or have the wrong information, then others in the group will work off those assumptions, believing that they must be right because everyone supports it (a little like groupthink).

The second reason is reputational pressures, meaning that people will silence themselves or change their opinion to avoid some social penalty (real or imagined).

I’d like to discuss the second reason in more detail, because as a behaviorist, I believe that if you can solve for team behavior, then you can correct the first reason in turn.


What happens in teams

Most of the time, a team will come together and jump right to the problem at hand. There is some result, decision, or discussion that needs to happen and the team immediately starts working on the problem.

Here’s the issue with this approach: only a few members of the team will actually contribute to the conversation, no one will stop and re-set the expectations for how the team is going to operate more collaboratively, and the group bulldozes forward to quickly wrap up the meeting.

As a recent New York Times article states, two characteristics of “smart teams” are team members who contribute equally to the discussion and are very adept at reading complex emotional states of other team members.

When a team lacks these characteristics, the result is silence and silos. Team members stay silent in an effort to avoid showing weakness, or they feel uncomfortable voicing their true thoughts and feelings because of possible repercussion. Silos then result because each team member is unwilling to give up their "turf." Because they don’t understand the collective good of the team objectives, individuals instead avoid the loss of what they already have because they don’t realize what can be gained.


How to create powerful teams

Exceptional leaders know that before they do anything else, they need to start first and foremost by building the collective EQ, or emotional intelligence, of the team. They build a good base of trust, from which anything can be freely discussed, everyone is expected to contribute, and established team roles are developed.

Trust has a dramatic effect on the EQ of a team. When trust is high, members pick up on the emotional cues from others in the group. They can sense when someone is uncomfortable, holding back or really excited about an idea. Using those cues, they collectively ensure everyone has a chance to be heard.

One of the most effective ways to build trust within a team is by enabling team members to feel more comfortable when being vulnerable with each other. They should feel secure about showing their weaknesses, making mistakes and sharing their fears. Individuals need to understand each other in a way that allows them to appreciate the unique contributions each team member brings.

One way to achieve this is by engaging the team in a behavioral profiling exercise. Using a personal assessment tool like DiSC, MBTI, or others allows team members to explore each other’s personal working style, discuss differences in neutral language, and understand the priorities and strengths of each individual.

This exercise can also help establish roles in team behaviors by uncovering who is naturally inclined to give authentic dissent; who has a knack for ensuring everyone is heard; and who will be willing to throw out an insane idea to get the group thinking about something different. As a leader, it’s your job to know the team well and leverage the strengths of the individual members in effective ways.


An abundance of perspectives creates holistic solutions

Once a team is completely open with each other, they are no longer afraid to engage in passionate debate in order to get to the best solutions. At Paladino, we describe this as "debating the idea, not the person." Our abundance thinking approach tells us that the best solutions come from differing points of views and perspectives. We play to the strengths of our teams by actively engaging in conflict and not hesitating to challenge or question each other. We know we’re all trying to do the best thing. We look for and listen to emotional cues and then ensure everyone is contributing to the discussion.

For sustainability leaders who are working with people with varied backgrounds and conflicting priorities, appreciating and allowing for these different perspectives is critical to making lasting organizational change through team work.

Once the foundations of trust and actively engaging in healthy conflict are set, committing to agree upon actions, holding each other accountable, and achieving results within a team will naturally follow.

About the Author: Julie Honeywell is Vice President of Talent Management at Paladino and Company. Read more posts from Honeywell.

More from Author

Paladino | Jan 10, 2022

The future of regenerative building is performance-based

Why measuring performance results is so critical, but also easier said than done.

Paladino | May 26, 2021

Injecting embodied carbon capability into the integrated design and construction process

Embodied carbon is defined as the carbon footprint of a material, and is expressed in metric tons of CO2e.

Paladino | May 12, 2021

Climate modeling for a resilient business and future

This post explores changes that developers and their teams need to make to their risk and resilience strategies by climate modeling for climate change.

Paladino | Apr 26, 2021

Building performance requirements are coming: Are you ready?

Building Performance Requirements are trending nationwide and are likely coming to a county near you.

Paladino | Feb 8, 2021

Six lessons learned from our first Fitwel Viral Response Module certification

The Fitwel Viral Response Module is one of several frameworks that real estate owners and operators can use to obtain third-party certification for their efforts ensuring their properties are ready for a safer and healthier return to work.

Paladino | Jan 14, 2021

Shift your energy to carbon

Now is the right and necessary time for the commercial real estate industry to shift its environmental strategy from just energy, a carbon contributor, to carbon itself.

Paladino | Nov 13, 2020

5 tips when designing for daylight

Daylight modeling is a tool to examine how daylight interacts with a building, and how that natural light behaves within interior spaces.

Paladino | Jul 16, 2020

COVID readiness: IWBI and USGBC seek to help businesses quantify risk

In an effort to address the risks of COVID-19 at the building scale, USGBC and IWBI have analyzed existing certification guidelines and drafted new, relevant content.

Paladino | Jun 29, 2020

The glass box paradox

Glass box designs have an energy performance problem.

Paladino | Jun 5, 2020

3 strategies to improve the wellness of building systems and gain tenant trust

Three operational issues that must be prioritized for every building in order to achieve tenant trust are air quality/ventilation, relative humidity, and building commissioning.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021


Magazine Subscription

Get our Newsletters

Each day, our editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.


Follow BD+C: