By improving the physical layout of hospitals and medical facilities, we can enhance and increase safety mechanisms, improve care, and help reduce the exposure to medical errors, writes Skanska USA's Andrew Quirk.
The last time you were in a hospital, did you take a good look around? What did you see?
By and large, today’s hospitals are still heavily tied to their predecessors that were the results of the Hill-Burton Act of 1946. This Act provided a federal mandate to improve the health and healthcare of Americans and add more beds to serve a growing population – so we added more hospitals.
Since then, even though hospitals have grown in size and complexity and of course are more modern in design, their physical layout has not kept pace with technological innovations and truly taken advantage of evidence-based design. Yes, they look different, are more modern, welcoming, and based on hospitality, but they have also grown, somewhat unchallenged, in square footage, materials, and support systems. One can look at a healthcare facility and come close to identifying the decade in which it was put into use.
The exciting modern advances in medical care, including robotics, hand-held devices, and models of care, have outpaced HOW a hospital efficiently functions; how it feels and how it lives; how the doctors, nurses, and technicians interact with patients and visitors. Add to this a lengthy recession and the upheaval of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and we have a healthcare industry facing a perfect storm for change - opportunity.
We hear a lot about "future proofing" buildings, making them adaptable for technologies we have yet to invent. Rather than a defensive approach, we should be talking about "future enabling" hospitals, making them flexible and adjustable in a way that invites those innovations to happen organically rather than forcing them into a box we built a decade or more earlier.
By improving the physical layout of hospitals and medical facilities, we can enhance and increase safety mechanisms, improve care, and help reduce the exposure to medical errors. Likewise, healthcare buildings should be built differently, using new technologies, skills, and materials.
There's no reason, for example, for all rooms to be dedicated to a single function over its lifespan. There's also no reason for elevators and major vertical mechanical systems to be in the core of the building; we can place them externally, allowing for more flexibility among rooms and departments – increasing square footage efficiencies, while keeping mechanical equipment accessible for maintenance and upgrades without interrupting care and operations within the space.
We can make hospitals more adaptable to new technologies and tools by making the footprints of various medical departments more flexible. Patients would benefit from a nimble medical complex that moves and progresses with their treatment, which would also be able to evolve as new techniques and technologies become available, ultimately improving the built environment where treatment is provided.
The need and opportunity for change is clear: incredible advancements in technologies, changing treatment protocols and care provided by talented and diverse clinicians, revised reimbursement structures, and growing patient safety issues. We have to look harder, deeper, and form creative new approaches to the possible factors that are contributing to this trend.
We have to explore other factors that impact health – including the way we design and build hospitals - that can positively affect clinical outcomes. We've been building hospitals the same way for more than half a century. It is perhaps time to start from a blank sheet of paper and if we did, what would it look like?
Is the process broken? No. But it is time to recalibrate how we envision and execute the built environment for future generations. As an industry, we have a tremendous opportunity to create and affect change the way the Hill-Burton Act did generations ago.