Electronic plan review: Coming soon to a city near you?

With all the effort AEC professionals put into leveraging technology to communicate digitally on projects, it is a shame that there is often one major road block that becomes the paper in their otherwise “paperless” project: the local city planning and permitting department. 

November 25, 2013 |
Sasha Reed

With all the effort architects, general contractors, engineers, consultants, and specialty contractors put into leveraging technology to communicate digitally on projects, it is a shame that there is often one major road block that becomes the paper in their otherwise “paperless” project: the local city planning and permitting department. 

With strict protocols and slow approval processes, many local cities and municipalities are struggling to make the migration to the digital age. And progressive project teams across the country are feeling the whiplash from having to put on the brakes and revert back to paper during this process.  

One large civil engineering firm recently told me that for all of the progress they’ve made to facilitate a paperless project, the progress stops at the city interaction. And until we get our cities and municipalities on board with electronic submittal, review and permitting processes, we will continue to see halted progress.  

Over the past four years, I’ve seen the struggle cities face up close and personal. From depleted budgets to lack of IT infrastructure to outdated laws, these are the challenges which hold them back from making any real progress. 

However, there are some municipalities which have made this migration a priority. They may be in the minority, but they are growing. From Washington to North Carolina to cities as small as Plano, Texas, to as large as Los Angeles County, many of them now offer e-permitting and submission of PDF plans for review.  

With collaboration technology bridging the gap between project team members, some are navigating away from traditionally paper-based reviews to online, collaborative review sessions. The cost savings being realized is not only from increases in productivity as a result of faster review cycles, but also from eliminating unexpected setbacks. For example, one city cited having as many as one workman’s comp claim per project due to the weight of the drawings sets being handled by reviewers! That has been drastically reduced simply by allowing clients to submit PDF drawing sets for review.  

Given that all projects must go through a permitting process, I wonder how this affects you and your projects. How do you work with your city? Are you able to submit digital plans for review? If not, do you wish you could?

Editor's Note: This is sponsored content. All text and images were supplied by the sponsor company.  

Sasha Reed | StrXur by Bluebeam
Bluebeam, Inc.
Vice President of Strategic Development

As Vice President of Strategic Development at Bluebeam, Inc., Sasha Reed collaborates with leaders in the architecture, engineering and construction industry to guide Bluebeam’s technology, partnerships and long-term goals. She joined Bluebeam in 2007 and co-created the Concierge Approach, a distinctly branded process of customer engagement, product feedback and solution delivery to which much of Bluebeam’s success is attributed, and which today is replicated at every organizational level.

Sasha is known industry-wide as a “conversation facilitator,” creating platforms for exchanges necessary to digitally advance the industry, including the BD+C Magazine Digital COM Blog, which she authors and manages. She’s been a featured presenter at numerous national and international conferences, including the 2014 Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), Federal Project Delivery Symposium and NTI Danish BIM Conference. Sasha also co-chairs the Construction PDF Coalition, a grassroots effort to provide a common industry framework from which to create and maintain construction PDF documents, serves on the City College of San Francisco BIM Industry Council, and is Advisor to the Board of Direction for the National Institute of Building Sciences BuildingSMART Alliance.

Related Blogs

4 people speaking on a panel
September 19, 2017 | BIM and Information Technology | StrXur by Bluebeam

In this four-part series, Bluebeam VP Sasha Reed sat down with industry experts to examine the need for def...

A hospital under construction
August 28, 2017 | Healthcare Facilities | StrXur by Bluebeam

McCarthy will continue to lean on Bluebeam solutions to help solve the most critical issues, and to keep th...

An exterior shot of the Beijing National Stadium
August 17, 2017 | Building Materials | StrXur by Bluebeam

Lighter than glass and 100% recyclable, one material takes center stage in the future of building.

Rendering of a Matrix-style theater
August 02, 2017 | Architects | StrXur by Bluebeam

An Australian Home Theater Company is out to prove that the easier you can see it, the easier you can sell...

July 19, 2017 | Architects | StrXur by Bluebeam

Our goal is to present unique perspectives you may not be able to find anywhere else.  

July 13, 2017 | Accelerate Live! | StrXur by Bluebeam

From my perspective, what separates organizations thriving in the digital revolution from those who are not...

March 15, 2017 | StrXur by Bluebeam

Who is succeeding, and on what terms? And what will it take for everyone to experience the benefits of that...

October 04, 2016 | Building Team | StrXur by Bluebeam

As the construction industry bounces back from the Great Recession, an entirely new class of tech-savvy con...

July 11, 2016 | Building Team | StrXur by Bluebeam

The lead up to AECX featured a discussion providing insight into the current state of the AEC technological...

June 23, 2016 | StrXur by Bluebeam

Two truths from the jobsite: 1) The best part about uncovering a problem is discovering its solution, and 2...

Overlay Init