flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
Currently Reading

Defining BIM – What do owners really want?

Defining BIM – What do owners really want?

Sasha Reed | May 12, 2014
Image: courtesy Bluebeam

There are so many conferences devoted to the topic of BIM today. Each one offers practical and innovative insights into how BIM can benefit the AECO industry as a whole.

The goal of BIM is to tie together valuable information created, distributed and gathered during the project life cycle—ultimately, to remove inefficiencies in our processes and change the way we share, distribute and make use of information. It is, after all, the “I” in BIM that differentiates this approach, from designing and modeling to information-focused exchanges between project team members.

However, the net value of BIM is sometimes challenging to determine. It seems the discussions surrounding BIM are becoming more complex: defining best practices for implementation, standardization, training, negotiations of responsibilities, levels of development and data interoperability makes for some pretty heady discussions.

In order to cut through all of the complexity, I thought it might be best to find out: What do owners want? Once I started asking this question, I discovered that oftentimes the owner doesn’t know how to ask for what they want. Given the complexities of the building process, it can be difficult to effectively communicate what they want and need. The response to the question usually is, “Give me everything.” 

My quest to distill down the usefulness of BIM from an owner’s perspective ultimately led me to Allen Angle with BRG Workplace Resources. Allen works with owners to help them define what they want and need. He focuses on data gathered between systems throughout the project. Our conversation provided some interesting insights and I thought I’d share some of them with you.

Allen’s background gives him a unique perspective. He’s a former construction professional, slash architect, turned owner’s rep. More specifically, he is a VDC - FM Integration Manager. I asked him to outline the top challenges facing owners and how architects, engineers and construction professionals can help provide the most value.

The first challenge Allen identified is that it is tough for owners right now to figure out what they want digitally and how to ask for it. A lot of what they’re asking for hasn’t caught up with the digital age.  He said BIM data is being lost due to contract data, which defines things in the “old” way. This limits architects and contractors’ ability to think in terms of mobility, electronic documentation and sharing information before the end of the project.

He pointed to the success he’s had over the last year and a half in taking a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to the building “exchange” process. The idea is to gather real-time asset data during the construction phase, which allows them to begin the exchange between contractor and facility manager earlier in the process.

The goal of the contractor’s data is to educate the facility manager during construction about the building they will eventually takeover. This includes focusing on gathering metadata and leveraging electronic documentation as much as possible. In addition, he believes that capital improvement, the general contractors and the FM team should be brought together earlier in the process. He feels it’s important for facilities management to participate in the upfront discussions, creating standards for the AEC team. He told me a story about the time he had maintenance guys who “turn wrenches” sit at the table with the Capital Projects group and GC. Up to this point, they’d never sat in a room together to review data needs.

The GCs, as well as others, are beginning to see the value in bringing these individuals into the discussions early on. The conversations focus on requesting the type of data and data standards they want to see in their IWMS/CMMS. If this is done right, the designer, GC and commissioner can work together with FM teams to set this up for the owner.

At the same time, FM teams can’t ask for everything. They need to be willing to narrow down the scope of what they need, taking baby steps towards their ultimate data goals. His focus now is working with owners to create Owner-driven Lifecycle BIM and VDC processes that complement their workflows and IWMS needs. Ultimately it’s up to them to pull the right people together. It’s clear that contractors are more than willing to provide just what the owner wants; they just need clear direction.  

Allen’s last comment was a reminder that that it’s not as much about geometry as it is about the information the owner wants to get out of the model. He suggests you engage the owner early on to find out what information is most important to them and their IWMS/CMMS.  Work with them to define the standards for communicating and providing information, ensuring you have a clear understanding of the value you can provide along the way.  

Editor's Note: This is sponsored content. The text and image were provided by the sponsor company.

More from Author

Sasha Reed | Dec 15, 2017

Future vs. current state of construction innovation: How will we make the leap?

Looking beyond today’s constraints to the possibility of what “could be” is a key characteristic of those defining and delivering innovation to design and building firms across the globe.

Sasha Reed | Sep 19, 2017

BIM vs VDC…how the US and the UK differ in approaching digital project delivery

In this four-part series, Bluebeam VP Sasha Reed sat down with industry experts to examine the need for defining and understanding digital workflows and data management throughout the design and construction project lifecycle.

Sasha Reed | Jul 19, 2017

Introducing StrXur by Bluebeam

Our goal is to present unique perspectives you may not be able to find anywhere else.  

Sasha Reed | Jul 13, 2017

Defining the future by mastering the art of change

From my perspective, what separates organizations thriving in the digital revolution from those who are not boils down to one thing: leadership.

Sasha Reed | Mar 15, 2017

Incentivizing change: Show me the money

Who is succeeding, and on what terms? And what will it take for everyone to experience the benefits of that success?

Sasha Reed | Oct 4, 2016

The talent shortage: Will the training the AEC industry desperately needs arrive in time?

As the construction industry bounces back from the Great Recession, an entirely new class of tech-savvy construction professionals has been created, and the supply of these highly skilled, tech-proficient pros has been quickly exhausted. 

Sasha Reed | Jul 11, 2016

Construction Disruption at AECX: Technology, hackathons and the promise of change in LA

The lead up to AECX featured a discussion providing insight into the current state of the AEC technological revolution by exploring opportunities, challenges and choices AEC pros face.  

Sasha Reed | Jun 23, 2016

Implementing Change: The Five Biggest Mistakes to Avoid

Two truths from the jobsite: 1) The best part about uncovering a problem is discovering its solution, and 2) The worst part about discovering the solution is implementing it. 

Sasha Reed | Jun 9, 2016

With all these sharks in the water… (No Predictions Here...Part 2)

Rather than fighting to control the proliferation of apps, perhaps we should be training our eyes to look for signs of long-term viability among all the fins in the water

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021


Magazine Subscription

Get our Newsletters

Each day, our editors assemble the latest breaking industry news, hottest trends, and most relevant research, delivered to your inbox.


Follow BD+C: