flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Building movement: When is it a problem?

Building Owners

Building movement: When is it a problem?

As buildings age, their structural conditions can deteriorate, causing damage and safety concerns. In order to mitigate this, it’s important to engage in the regular inspection and condition assessment of buildings for diagnosis.

By Dan Barbuto, PE, Senior Project Manager, and Abhishek Aggarwal, PE, Project Manager | Walter P Moore | July 12, 2023
Building movement: When is it a problem?
Photo courtesy Walter P Moore

As buildings age, their structural conditions can deteriorate, causing damage and safety concerns. In order to mitigate this, it’s important to engage in the regular inspection and condition assessment of buildings for diagnosis.

One common form of structural deterioration is referred to as building movement and can surface in varying ways, including uneven floor slabs, cracks in walls, uneven ceiling panels, excessively compressed or extended joints, racked doors, water infiltration, and in extreme cases shifting or leaning columns or walls. Of course, when deformations continue untreated, the distress worsens, and the safety of the building and occupants is compromised.

Typically, building movement can be categorized in three primary ways: foundation or deep movement, slab-on-ground movement, and structural deficiencies.

What to Consider

Excessive movement affects occupant comfort, perception of safety, building serviceability, structural durability, and actual structural safety. As an example, the movement of slab-on-ground can result in the creation of trip hazards or sloped slab that exceeds ADA requirements or local accessibility standards, while structural safety concerns arise from unstable racked structures that can collapse.

Environmental factors also come into play. If the area is known for bad soil, poor site drainage, or large trees near the exterior perimeter of the building can exacerbate movement causing seasonal fluctuations of movement during the rainy season or during extended droughts.

Identifying problems and addressing them sooner mitigates both risk and cost, often making the extent of the repair much less.

With that in mind, how can property owners tackle issues preemptively?

There are some early diagnostic questions to consider:

  • Is the distress localized to one area or global?
  • What type of distress are they noticing?
  • What part of the building is experiencing the movement?
  • Are there any uneven slabs?
  • Are there any openings such as doors or windows no longer operating?
  • Has there been a recent change in use of the building or recent construction in or around the building?

Holistic Approach

It is significant to note that some level of building movement is acceptable and even expected. Depending on the site-specific soils, building materials, and location, there are varying degrees of expectations, uneven surfaces, and deflections. For example, building code allows for a limited amount of deflection that differs for various framing elements over a given length or height, and the slab-on-ground has an allowable tilt or curvature that is acceptable by code.

Building movement requires an engineering investigation to identify the root causes of the movement and to provide recommendations that address both the immediate concern and the long-term building performance. To address and mitigate ongoing building movement, it is often crucial that repairs be performed in tandem with one another in order to maintain the building. For instance, to properly address slab-on-ground-related distress, it is important to mitigate sources of soil moisture in conjunction with repairing the slab-on-ground while at the same time implementing repairs to the finishes that can accommodate some future differential movement.

At Walter P Moore, our team incorporates a holistic approach, combining the immediate needs with the long-term building performance. Walter P Moore’s expertise and technical knowledge combined with a focus on understanding our client’s needs allows us to provide repair recommendations and designs that are both practical and efficient.

About the Authors
Dan Barbuto, PE, is a Senior Project Manager for Walter P Moore’s Diagnostics Group, based in Houston. Abhishek Aggarwal, PE, is a Project Manager for Walter P Moore’s Diagnostics Group, based in Dallas.

More from Author

Walter P Moore | Sep 8, 2023

Secrets of a structural engineer

Walter P Moore's Scott Martin, PE, LEED AP, DBIA, offers tips and takeaways for young—and veteran—structural engineers in the AEC industry. 

Walter P Moore | Jun 14, 2023

The high cost of low maintenance

Walter P Moore’s Javier Balma, PhD, PE, SE, and Webb Wright, PE, identify the primary causes of engineering failures, define proactive versus reactive maintenance, recognize the reasons for deferred maintenance, and identify the financial and safety risks related to deferred maintenance.

Walter P Moore | Jun 5, 2023

How to properly assess structural wind damage

Properly assessing wind damage can identify vulnerabilities in a building's design or construction, which could lead to future damage or loss, writes Matt Wagner, SE, Principal and Managing Director with Walter P Moore.

Walter P Moore | Jun 5, 2023

27 important questions about façade leakage

Walter P Moore’s Darek Brandt discusses the key questions building owners and property managers should be asking to determine the health of their building's façade.  

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

University Buildings

Yale University breaks ground on nation's largest Living Building student housing complex

A groundbreaking on Oct. 11 kicked off a project aiming to construct the largest Living Building Challenge-certified residence on a university campus. The Living Village, a 45,000 sf home for Yale University Divinity School graduate students, “will make an ecological statement about the need to build in harmony with the natural world while training students to become ‘apostles of the environment’,” according to Bruner/Cott, which is leading the design team that includes Höweler + Yoon Architecture and Andropogon Associates.


Kimley-Horn eliminates the guesswork of electric vehicle charger site selection

Private businesses and governments can now choose their new electric vehicle (EV) charger locations with data-driven precision. Kimley-Horn, the national engineering, planning, and design consulting firm, today launched TREDLite EV, a cloud-based tool that helps organizations develop and optimize their EV charger deployment strategies based on the organization’s unique priorities.

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021