Working on the expansion of the new Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, I formed an especially strong bond over the project’s evolution with Arash Guity. Arash is an energy engineer for Mazzetti, and I am the sustainable healthcare leader for Perkins+Will. Over the many (many) years that it took to build this hospital, we were struck time and again at just how reliant our work was on the twin ideas of trust and relationship-building. We were also drawing on another relationship, that of Perkins+Will’s healthcare principal and project director for the hospital expansion, Robin Guenther, FAIA, and Walt Vernon, the CEO of Mazzetti. Robin and Walt have formed a connection where advancing sustainability is a driving force.
When you walk into Packard Children’s, you know you’ve entered a special place. The building, which opened its doors to patients this past December, was, from the start, intended to be the most sustainable hospital in the world. The entire design and construction team—Perkins+Will, Mazzetti, HGA, and DPR Construction—was instrumental in finding ways to back up that claim.
As Robin and Walt will tell you, Packard Children’s was designed specifically to have a positive impact on health—a striking percentage of buildings out there, even hospitals, aren’t actually designed to improve health. Some even do the opposite. To that end, the hospital’s windows, daylighting, mechanical systems and ventilation, access to nature—everything was selected after asking, “How does this improve the delivery of care?” This building is a home away from home for children with life threatening or chronic illnesses, and their families. So, our highest priority was to create a healing environment.
In the design world, a healthy building is a high-performing building. We noticed very early in the design process, given our massive emphasis on performance, that this project was going to require a new level of integration. And truly integrated design process results in a building that is unique to its collaboration.
A few of our decisions were instrumental in shaping the hospital’s precedent-setting sustainability profile. We hope they give some ideas to any HVAC-minded readers—healthcare facility directors and beyond—who have a chance to impact their own operations.
Critical Schematic Design Collaboration
Early in the Schematic Design phase, we evaluated a range of approaches to the HVAC system. Beyond energy savings, we considered several factors: architectural impact and cost, ease of operations, and impact on users and occupants. Mazzetti’s energy model analyzed the life-cycle cost benefits for each option. We also gave key stakeholders, including the facilities team, a chance to voice their comfort with operating the systems upon completion.
So, fully equipped—with energy modeling data, key stakeholder input, architectural impact, and cost estimates—we found the most suitable systems that could inform our architectural design. Collaborating so early in Schematic Design is one of the key reasons the building’s performance is so highly developed.
Displacement Ventilation Systems
Another critical factor was our use of displacement ventilation. In 2007, just prior to the starting work on Packard, Mazzetti formed a collaborative to evaluate alternative ventilation strategies for healthcare facilities. This research went through rigorous testing procedures utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling and physical lab testing. It was subsequently validated by the National Institute of Health, amended to ASHRAE’s Standard 170 and adopted into code. The benefits were clear: displacement ventilation greatly reduced energy consumption, improved the removal of airborne particulate matter, and increased the efficacy of ventilation overall. At Packard, patient comfort wouldn’t be too far behind.
Architecturally Integrated Building Systems
We integrated building systems into the architecture. Upon selecting the building systems, we identified architectural features that could, essentially, “hide” them. For instance, as you enter the hospital’s dramatic yet welcoming lobby, you’ll notice majestic white columns throughout the space. Less obvious is the ventilation infrastructure housed within these columns.
Typically, displacement ventilation (DV) is best used in an environment with high ceilings, in which only the lowest six feet needs conditioning. Here, however, the vastness of the lobby posed a challenge for thorough, uniform distribution. Using the height of the columns to mask and house the necessary DV duct work proved to be one of our most significant design integrations. We’re going to closely track the DV performance at Packard, which is one of the first inpatient US hospitals to utilize DV. (In fact, all of Packard’s systems will be monitored continuously to understand actual performance. “Future-proofing” our work creates intel for future opportunities.)
DV systems are further masked in the individual patient rooms. A DV system requires air introduction from the ground up. But concealing its duct work at ground level usually consumes valuable square footage. We discovered that the foot of the bed could be incorporated into the solution, integrating the casework around the DV diffuser. This yielded benefits for the patient and, in regard to energy savings, the building.
When you’re working in a healthcare environment, especially when you’re working on behalf of children, considering how the space can positively contribute to the healing process and to the patient experience is no longer optional. Our design considerations included the kids and their families, creating an experience beyond that of being in an “institution.” Similarly, we can no longer consider sustainability an option. A building must perform, and perform in a way that reflects our collective responsibility as environmental stewards.
In other words, designing a healing place now means understanding how a building affects its people and its environment. We and the entire Packard team are proud to have brought that understanding to life.
More from Author
Perkins and Will | May 30, 2023
How design supports a more holistic approach to training
For today’s college athletes, training is no longer about cramming team practices and weight lifting sessions in between classes.
Perkins and Will | Dec 20, 2022
4 triage design innovations for shorter wait times
Perkins and Will shares a nurse's insights on triage design, and how to help emergency departments make the most of their resources.
Perkins and Will | Aug 30, 2021
The great re-shuffle & re-think
In this new hybrid environment in which we cater to how our employees work best, how will we manage new hybrid work practices and etiquette?
Perkins and Will | May 18, 2020
Global design firms collaborate on new COVID-19 mobile testing lab to bring testing to vulnerable communities worldwide
Perkins and Will, Schmidt Hammer Lassen Architects, and Arup Group develop scalable solutions for increased testing capacity within high-density and under-served neighborhoods.
Perkins and Will | Jun 7, 2019
Workplace wellness: Top 3 tips for Fitwel certification
How can thoughtful design encourage healthier choices, lifestyles, and work environments?
Perkins and Will | Feb 27, 2019
ResilientSEE: A framework to achieve resilience across scales
Conceived in the Boston studio of Perkins+Will, the ResilientSEE team developed a resilient planning framework that can be applied to other neighborhoods, cities, and countries.
Perkins and Will | Nov 28, 2018
Amazon HQ2 and the new geography of work
The big HQ2 takeaway is how geography and mobility are becoming major workplace drivers.
Perkins and Will | Sep 4, 2018
It takes more than money to fund resilience
Resilient design, much like all projects in the built environment, requires funding.
Perkins and Will | Aug 13, 2018
There's more to the open office than headlines suggest
A study found that contrary to popular belief, the open office did not encourage—but rather, inhibited—face-to-face communication.
Perkins and Will | Apr 13, 2018
Integrating many voices into a single vision
There’s no question that, as opposed to a top-down process, an open process is best for an office like ours.