flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Yale launches carbon charge pilot program with 20 ‘living laboratories’ on New Haven campus

Resiliency

Yale launches carbon charge pilot program with 20 ‘living laboratories’ on New Haven campus

Students played 'integral role' in development of four carbon-reduction experiments.
 


By Jim Shelton, YaleNews | December 8, 2015

Yale University, New Haven, Conn. Photo: Adam Jones, Ph.D.

December 7, 2015: Yale University has launched a first-of-its-kind pilot program to put a price tag on the use of carbon — with some of the most prominent campus buildings playing a role in the experiment.

Twenty Yale buildings — including the Peabody Museum of Natural History, the School of Management’s Evans Hall, the School of Medicine’s Yale Physicians Building, and Yale Divinity School’s Sterling Divinity Quad — are taking part in the new carbon charge pilot program. So is Woodbridge Hall, the administrative home of Yale President Peter Salovey.

“The carbon charge concept originated as a proposal from Yale undergraduate and graduate students interested in using our campus as a living laboratory for applied research,” said Salovey, who announced the program with Provost Benjamin Polak. “Students were an integral part of the Presidential Carbon Charge Task Force, and many continue to serve in the pilot. Yale’s carbon charge pilot project is an exciting example of how students, faculty members, and staff can collaborate to build a more sustainable and innovative Yale.”

Placing a monetary value on carbon use is considered critical to creating an effective sustainability strategy and is a growing trend in the private sector. The idea is to prompt behavior changes at the individual and organizational levels by putting a price on the carbon dioxide used. Carbon dioxide is a byproduct of all activities that rely on the combustion of fossil fuels for power.

Yale has approximately 350 buildings and uses 3.6 million MMBtu of energy each year. The university generates 60% of its own power at its two co-generation power plants. The remaining electricity is purchased from United Illuminating Co., and natural gas is purchased from Southern Connecticut Gas to power the power plants. The university emits roughly 300,000 tons of carbon dioxide a year. In 2005, Yale pledged to reduce its primary greenhouse gas emissions 43% below 2005 levels by 2020. The university remains on track to meet this ambitious goal.

In 2014, Salovey outlined six sustainability initiatives for Yale, noting that, “Global climate change and its consequences are critical challenges for our time, and Yale has important and necessary roles to play in addressing them.” The initiatives included a $21 million capital investment in energy conservation and greenhouse gas reduction, an expansion of renewable energy, third-party verification of Yale’s greenhouse gas emissions, and the formation of the Presidential Carbon Charge Task Force.

The task force, chaired by Sterling Professor of Economics William Nordhaus, began looking into the feasibility of an internal carbon-pricing program in 2014. Earlier this year, the group presented its recommendations to Salovey. Among those recommendations were that Yale set a carbon charge at the social cost of carbon, currently estimated by the federal government to be $40 per ton of carbon dioxide.

“A key element is that the carbon charge program would expand Yale’s role as a pioneer in research, teaching, and designing practical applications of energy and climate policies,” Nordhaus said. “It would thereby contribute to society’s learning about ways to slow climate change while advancing Yale’s educational mission.”

One novel aspect of Yale’s pilot program is that it is essentially a quartet of experiments to find the best approach to carbon pricing. Each experiment will have five Yale buildings testing a particular manner of carbon pricing:

A market-based model will have Yale units competing with one another to earn rebates.
A target-based model will ask Yale units to meet specified carbon-use goals, in order to earn rebates that are applied to the unit’s annual budget.
An investment model will have Yale units paying a monthly carbon tax for the year. At the end of the year, units will get the money back, with a stipulation that a percentage of the returned money be spent on additional energy-saving measures within their building.
A price signal approach will present Yale units with detailed information about ongoing energy use, along with comparable information about past years’ energy use. The units also will receive regular updates on how their performance would translate into a straight carbon tax payment at the social cost of carbon, purely for informational purposes.

“This will help us arrive at the best model for Yale and allow us to share the lessons we learn with other institutions. That’s a key aspect of the program,” said Ryan Laemel, Yale’s carbon charge project coordinator. “There is no one-size-fits-all approach that works for internal carbon pricing.” (See "How Yale's Carbon Charge Project Works," below.)

The pilot program includes classrooms, residential colleges, laboratories, and offices. Other buildings taking part include Berkeley, Jonathan Edwards, and Pierson residential colleges; the Gilder Boat House; Kroon Hall; and the Yale Health Center.

“It goes beyond simply diversifying the size of the buildings or their carbon footprints. It includes a range of different activity types, budgeting categories, utilities used, building users, and equipment contained,” said carbon charge project manager Jennifer Milikowsky, who is a recent graduate of the joint degree program at the School of Forestry & Environmental Studies and the School of Management. “By doing this we’ll begin to learn how the success of the policies we are testing is influenced by these different characteristics and will help as we continue to expand and improve this project.”

In their announcement, Salovey and Polak noted that feedback from participants and an analysis of the program’s results would inform a broader campus conversation on the topic. “We believe that this pilot project can serve as a model for other institutions, expanding Yale’s role as a pioneer in researching, teaching, and designing climate change solutions,” they said.

Tags

Related Stories

Sponsored | Steel Buildings | Nov 7, 2022

Steel structures offer faster path to climate benefits

Faster delivery of buildings isn’t always associated with sustainability benefits or long-term value, but things are changing. An instructive case is in the development of steel structures that not only allow speedier erection times, but also can reduce embodied carbon and create durable, highly resilient building approaches.

Fire and Life Safety | Oct 4, 2022

Fire safety considerations for cantilevered buildings

Bold cantilevered designs are prevalent today, as developers and architects strive to maximize space, views, and natural light in buildings. Cantilevered structures, however, present a host of challenges for building teams, according to José R. Rivera, PE, Associate Principal and Director of Plumbing and Fire Protection with Lilker.

Resiliency | Sep 30, 2022

Designing buildings for wildfire defensibility

Wold Architects and Engineers' Senior Planner Ryan Downs, AIA, talks about how to make structures and communities more fire-resistant.

Building Team | Jun 13, 2022

Partnership rethinks emergency shelters to turn them into sustainable, resilient homes

Holcim and the Norman Foster Foundation have struck a partnership to rethink emergency shelters to turn them into sustainable and resilient homes.

Green Specifications | May 12, 2022

MG2’s Sustainable Materials Evaluation System

Learn how MG2’s Sustainable Materials Evaluation System helps clients, prospects, and staff choose the most environmentally feasible materials for their building projects. Candon Murphy, LEED GA, Assoc. IIDA, Design Lab Manager and Materials & Sustainability Specialist with MG2, speaks with BD+C Executive Editor     Rob Cassidy.

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | May 10, 2022

Design guide for parapets: Safety, continuity, and the building code

This course covers design considerations for parapets. The modern parapet must provide fire protection, serve as a fall-protective guard, transition and protect the roof/facade interface, conceal rooftop equipment, and contribute to the aesthetic character of the building. 

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | May 5, 2022

Designing with architectural insulated metal wall panels

Insulated metal wall panels (IMPs) offer a sleek, modern, and lightweight envelope system that is highly customizable. This continuing education course explores the characteristics of insulated metal wall panels, including how they can offer a six-in-one design solution. Discussions also include design options, installation processes, code compliance, sustainability, and available warranties.

Sponsored | BD+C University Course | Apr 19, 2022

Multi-story building systems and selection criteria

This course outlines the attributes, functions, benefits, limits, and acoustic qualities of composite deck slabs. It reviews the three primary types of composite systems that represent the full range of long-span composite floor systems and examines the criteria for their selection, design, and engineering.

Wood | Apr 13, 2022

Mass timber: Multifamily’s next big building system

Mass timber construction experts offer advice on how to use prefabricated wood systems to help you reach for the heights with your next apartment or condominium project. 

AEC Tech Innovation | Mar 9, 2022

Meet Emerge: WSP USA's new AEC tech incubator

Pooja Jain, WSP’s VP-Strategic Innovation, discusses the pilot programs her firm’s new incubator, Emerge, has initiated with four tech startup companies. Jain speaks with BD+C's John Caulfield about the four AEC tech firms to join Cohort 1 of the firm’s incubator.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021