![Top 70 Local Government Engineering + EA Firms [2018 Giants 300 Report]](/sites/default/files/LOCAL%20GOVT%20ENG.jpg "Top 70 Local Government Engineering + EA Firms [2018 Giants 300 Report]")
| TOP 70 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING + EA FIRMS | ||
| RANK | COMPANY | 2017 LOCAL GOVT. REVENUE |
| 1 | AECOM | $32,000,000 |
| 2 | Dewberry | $26,510,550 |
| 3 | Jacobs | $26,352,778 |
| 4 | Arup | $23,778,621 |
| 5 | Burns Engineering | $22,042,000 |
| 6 | STV | $21,949,226 |
| 7 | Halff Associates | $11,900,000 |
| 8 | Allen & Shariff | $9,310,045 |
| 9 | Shive-Hattery | $8,726,088 |
| 10 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $7,253,212 |
| 11 | Walker Consultants | $7,091,575 |
| 12 | Morrison Hershfield | $6,860,466 |
| 13 | Martin/Martin | $5,555,025 |
| 14 | IMEG Corp. | $5,250,000 |
| 15 | Arora Engineers | $4,741,321 |
| 16 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $4,700,000 |
| 17 | Syska Hennessy Group | $4,215,399 |
| 18 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $4,150,000 |
| 19 | WSP | $4,037,000 |
| 20 | Wendel | $4,012,088 |
| 21 | Ghafari Associates | $3,400,000 |
| 22 | French & Parrello Associates | $3,307,950 |
| 23 | NV5 Global | $3,002,031 |
| 24 | Guernsey | $2,675,903 |
| 25 | M/E Engineering | $2,519,600 |
| 26 | Affiliated Engineers | $2,409,000 |
| 27 | Primera Engineers | $2,341,087 |
| 28 | Interface Engineering | $2,223,369 |
| 29 | Woolpert | $2,178,000 |
| 30 | TEECOM | $2,049,200 |
| 31 | Jensen Hughes | $1,908,188 |
| 32 | Spectrum Engineers | $1,698,309 |
| 33 | JQ Engineering | $1,619,000 |
| 34 | Kohler Ronan | $1,586,306 |
| 35 | RMF Engineering | $1,500,000 |
| 36 | Setty | $1,436,951 |
| 37 | Salas O'Brien | $1,386,762 |
| 38 | dbHMS | $1,220,000 |
| 39 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $1,217,415 |
| 40 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $1,216,135 |
| 41 | P2S | $1,184,797 |
| 42 | Coffman Engineers | $1,123,685 |
| 43 | PS&S | $1,055,000 |
| 44 | RTM Engineering Consultants | $1,000,000 |
| 45 | I.C. Thomasson Associates | $900,000 |
| 46 | Vanderweil Engineers | $864,200 |
| 47 | Ross & Baruzzini | $861,298 |
| 48 | Smith Seckman Reid | $859,619 |
| 49 | Architectural Engineers | $775,994 |
| 50 | Newcomb & Boyd | $735,201 |
| 51 | Thompson Consulting Engineers | $690,706 |
| 52 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $637,000 |
| 53 | Heapy Engineering | $636,847 |
| 54 | CJL Engineering | $629,430 |
| 55 | ThermalTech Engineering | $559,000 |
| 56 | Walter P Moore | $558,422 |
| 57 | G & W Engineering | $500,000 |
| — | KCI Technologies | $500,000 |
| 59 | Nitsch Engineering | $471,269 |
| 60 | Henderson Engineers | $425,702 |
| 61 | Graef | $356,970 |
| 62 | Glumac | $260,000 |
| 63 | DWL Architects + Planners | $209,744 |
| 64 | Schaefer | $204,425 |
| 65 | H.F. Lenz | $150,000 |
| 66 | PEDCO E&A Services | $140,000 |
| 67 | AKF Group | $116,961 |
| 68 | Global Engineering Solutions | $100,000 |
| 69 | KCL Engineering | $57,900 |
| 70 | Stanley Consultants | $51,500 |
| 71 | Wick Fisher White | $51,000 |
| 72 | Dunham Associates | $50,000 |
| 73 | PBS Engineers | $25,000 |
| 74 | Zak Companies | $17,705 |
Source: BD+C's 2018 Giants 300 Report
BACK TO 2018 GIANTS 300 REPORT LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
| Aug 30, 2016
CONVENTION CENTER GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top convention center sector design and construction firms
Gensler, LMN Architects, AECOM, Turner Construction Co., and WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest convention center sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
BIM and Information Technology | Aug 30, 2016
BIM GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top BIM design and construction firms
HOK, Perkins+Will, Turner Construction Co., The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., Jacobs, and Thornton Tomasetti top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest BIM AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
RECONSTRUCTION GIANTS: Facelifts give buildings new identities, even as they keep a few wrinkles
Reconstruction is always a balancing act between the client’s pro forma and what the building needs to be vibrant again.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms
Jacobs, Robins & Morton, and The Boldt Company top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 110 Reconstruction Construction Firms
Gilbane Building Co., Turner Construction Co., and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector construction and construction management firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 130 Reconstruction Architecture Firms
The Beck Group, Stantec, and IMC Consruction top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector architecture and A/E firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
LOCAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in local sector work
HOK, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Clark Group, AECOM and STV top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest local government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
STATE GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in state sector work
CannonDesign, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Mortensen Construction, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest state government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in federal sector work
Page, EYP, Fluor Corp.,BL Harbert International, and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest federal government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 15, 2016
SPORTS FACILITY GIANTS: New and renovated college sports venues - designed to serve students and the community
Schools are renovating existing structures or building new sports facilities that can serve the student body and surrounding community.
