Massive storm surge barriers would be too costly for the potential benefit to protect New York City from violent storms like Hurricane Sandy, researchers say.
U.S. and Netherlands-based researchers ran 549 simulations of storm surges of varying intensity for a cost-benefit analysis of different approaches for New York to defend itself against flooding including the construction of massive surge barriers in lower New York Bay and Long Island Sound.
While the barriers would have a positive impact, the more cost-effective option is to allow floodwaters to surge into the city while protecting critical infrastructure near sea level, such as airports, the researchers concluded. The study was published in the May 2 issue of Science.
The most cost-effective scenario had no surge barriers are at the outer limits of the city.
Rather, building codes would be made tougher for low-lying parts of New York and New Jersey, and there would be a focus on protection of critical infrastructure and “moderate enhancement protection” along parts of the Manhattan and Brooklyn waterfronts.
This plan would cost $10 to $12 billion and, the report suggests, could be paid for through a tourist “resilience fee.”
Related Stories
BAS and Security | Oct 19, 2022
The biggest cybersecurity threats in commercial real estate, and how to mitigate them
Coleman Wolf, Senior Security Systems Consultant with global engineering firm ESD, outlines the top-three cybersecurity threats to commercial and institutional building owners and property managers, and offers advice on how to deter and defend against hackers.
Green | Oct 5, 2022
In California, a public power provider’s new headquarters serves as a test case for an innovative microgrid and for reducing greenhouse gas emissions
Sonoma Clean Power (SCP), the public power provider for California’s Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, recently unveiled its new all-electric headquarters.
Smart Buildings | Jun 1, 2022
Taking full advantage of smart building technology
Drew Deatherage of Crux Solutions discusses where owners and AEC firms could do better at optimizing smart technology in building design and operations.
Digital Twin | May 24, 2021
Digital twin’s value propositions for the built environment, explained
Ernst & Young’s white paper makes its cases for the technology’s myriad benefits.
Smart Buildings | Nov 20, 2020
The Weekly show: SPIRE smart building rating system, and pickleball court design tips
The November 19 episode of BD+C's The Weekly is available for viewing on demand.
Smart Buildings | Oct 26, 2020
World’s first smart building assessment and rating program released
The SPIRE Smart Building Program will help building owners and operators make better investment decisions, improve tenant satisfaction, and increase asset value.
Smart Buildings | Oct 1, 2020
Smart buildings stand on good data
The coming disruption of owning and operating a building and how to stay ahead through BIM.
AEC Tech | Jan 16, 2020
EC firms with a clear ‘digital roadmap’ should excel in 2020
Deloitte, in new report, lays out a risk mitigation strategy that relies on tech.
Urban Planning | Oct 20, 2016
Despite troubled development, Masdar City forges ahead
The detailed master plan for Phase 2 of Masdar City has been unveiled by CBT.
Smart Buildings | Feb 10, 2016
100 Resilient Cities to partner with Perkins Eastman
Perkins Eastman joins 100RC group of Platform Partners to offer resilience-building services to member cities.