flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

6 myths holding back green building

Green

6 myths holding back green building

Sustainable design has proven benefits, so why isn’t it more widely adopted?


By BD+C Staff | March 22, 2015
6 myths holding back green building

1225 Connecticut Avenue NW is an office building in the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Built in 1968, with a $32 million renovation in 2009 by Brookfield Properties and RTKL Associates. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Green building has not gotten as much traction as it should, given its many benefits, writes Lance Hosey, Chief Sustainability Officer with RTKL.

Despite reports that LEED-certified buildings can cut greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption by half, while costing 25% less to operate, only about 1% of the U.S. building stock is green. Hosey attributes this situation to six misperceptions about sustainable design:

1. Myth: Sustainability Equals Environmentalism. Reality: Green design is not just for tree huggers. It also produces economic value.

2. Myth: Sustainability Equals Technology. Reality: Sustainability is not just about solar panels and wind turbines.

3. Myth: Sustainable Design Costs Too Much. Reality: Today, LEED-certified buildings can be built at the same cost or even lower cost than conventional construction.

4. Myth: Sustainable Design Takes More Time. Reality: Integrated design, which brings together a project's key stakeholders, designers, consultants and contractors early to get consensus on goals, can save time by ensuring more thorough coordination and avoiding costly changes later.

5. Myth: Sustainability Isn't About Design. Reality: Green design is not just about specifications in a technical manual. For instance, decisions about a building’s shape have a significant impact on the resources needed.

6. Myth: Sustainable Design Isn't Beautiful. Reality: The look and feel of design are essential to sustainability. “Following the lessons of sustainability to their logical conclusion will inspire more designers to reconsider the impact of every decision, including form and image,” Hosey says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Aug 3, 2020

Report aids local governments on policy options, pathways to electrify new buildings

Document focuses on switching appliances and equipment away from natural gas, propane.

Codes and Standards | Jul 30, 2020

Institute for Market Transformation acquires Energy-Efficient Codes Coalition

Goal is to achieve net-zero construction by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Jul 29, 2020

Crackdowns grow on construction firms that fail to follow COVID-19 guidelines

States, cities, and OSHA enforce social distancing, hand-washing regulations.

Codes and Standards | Jul 28, 2020

California utility adopts climate emergency declaration

Sacramento-region company commits to working towards carbon neutrality by 2030.

Codes and Standards | Jul 23, 2020

North Carolina will stop relying on FEMA flood mapping

State will identify flood zones on its own.

Codes and Standards | Jul 22, 2020

New version of IAPMO’s Water Demand Calculator is available

Enhanced features include selection between single- and multifamily buildings.

Codes and Standards | Jul 22, 2020

Mobile app calculates sound transmission for wood-framed assemblies

American Wood Council tool for floor-ceiling assemblies.

Codes and Standards | Jul 22, 2020

Architecture billings remain in negative territory, begin to stabilize

Fewer architecture firms report declining billings this month.

Codes and Standards | Jul 20, 2020

N.Y. construction firm to pay $1.5 million to settle sexual harassment claim

Managers said to demand sex for pay and OT opportunities.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021