Print
EmailTop 100 institutional design firms
|
Top 100 institutional design firms (2007 billings in $ millions) |
||
| Company |
Billings |
|
| 1. | AECOM Technology Corp. | 761,670,000 |
| 2. | Jacobs Engineering Group | 550,880,120 |
| 3. | CH2M HILL | 409,684,080 |
| 4. | Arup | 396,000,000 |
| 5. | URS Corp. | 352,000,000 |
| 6. | HOK | 263,188,266 |
| 7. | Perkins+Will | 210,800,000 |
| 8. | HDR Architecture | 180,200,000 |
| 9. | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 122,880,000 |
| 10. | Heery International | 122,667,200 |
| 11. | Stantec | 112,088,969 |
| 12. | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 109,600,000 |
| 13. | STV Group | 106,200,000 |
| 14. | Cannon Design | 99,120,000 |
| 15. | HNTB Architecture | 96,738,321 |
| 16. | Fluor | 91,406,400 |
| 17. | HKS | 90,336,120 |
| 18. | RTKL Associates | 84,694,000 |
| 19. | RS&H | 80,850,000 |
| 20. | SmithGroup | 80,124,000 |
| 21. | NBBJ | 75,981,860 |
| 22. | Burt Hill | 74,634,010 |
| 23. | Rosser International | 74,250,000 |
| 24. | Gensler | 73,500,000 |
| 25. | DLR Group | 70,824,000 |
| 26. | Perkins Eastman | 66,300,000 |
| 27. | PageSoutherlandPage | 63,669,600 |
| 28. | Leo A Daly | 60,960,000 |
| 29. | NTD Architecture | 55,856,000 |
| 30. | RMJM | 53,460,000 |
| 31. | Gresham, Smith and Partners | 52,834,400 |
| 32. | Smith Seckman Reid | 52,575,000 |
| 33. | HMC Architects | 52,420,486 |
| 34. | BSA LifeStructures | 50,892,070 |
| 35. | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 49,595,000 |
| 36. | Einhorn Yaffee Prescott | 48,312,000 |
| 37. | Anshen+Allen | 46,554,094 |
| 38. | Burns & McDonnell | 45,360,000 |
| 39. | Ellerbe Becket | 45,165,600 |
| 40. | PBK | 44,795,000 |
| 41. | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | 42,166,000 |
| 42. | Thornton Tomasetti | 40,170,000 |
| 43. | Dewberry | 39,200,000 |
| 44. | TMAD Taylor & Gaines | 38,561,806 |
| 45. | Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects | 38,354,273 |
| 46. | Moseley Architects | 38,200,000 |
| 47. | Harley Ellis Devereaux | 37,185,000 |
| 48. | Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott | 36,623,871 |
| 49. | Fanning/Howey Associates | 36,532,322 |
| 50. | X-nth | 35,218,871 |
| 51. | WHR Architects | 34,790,009 |
| 52. | OWP/P | 34,320,000 |
| 53. | Vanderweil Engineers | 33,119,407 |
| 54. | Affiliated Engineers | 32,472,500 |
| 55. | KlingStubbins | 30,600,000 |
| 56. | TRO Jung|Brannen | 30,566,250 |
| 57. | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 29,970,000 |
| 58. | EwingCole | 28,890,000 |
| 59. | Sasaki Associates | 28,050,000 |
| 60. | FKP Architects | 27,434,880 |
| 61. | SSOE | 27,000,000 |
| 62. | S/L/A/M Collaborative, The | 26,164,600 |
| 63. | Clark Nexsen | 26,060,345 |
| 64. | LPA | 25,556,944 |
| 65. | Harvard Jolly | 24,257,881 |
| 66. | Thomas Group, The | 24,255,000 |
| 67. | FreemanWhite | 24,251,364 |
| 68. | M+W Zander | 22,750,000 |
| 69. | CUH2A | 22,405,600 |
| 70. | Arquitectonica | 21,834,000 |
| 71. | PBS&J | 21,593,885 |
| 72. | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 20,795,250 |
| 73. | Baker and Associates | 20,640,000 |
| 74. | Karlsberger | 20,500,000 |
| 75. | CTA Architects Engineers | 20,384,000 |
| 76. | Durrant Group, The | 19,800,000 |
| 77. | Flack + Kurtz | 19,610,000 |
| 78. | H+L Architecture | 19,215,126 |
| 79. | Syska Hennessy Group | 19,214,812 |
| 80. | RBB Architects | 18,700,000 |
| 81. | Flad Architects | 18,450,000 |
| 82. | Sparling | 18,177,000 |
| 83. | Odell Associates | 18,105,000 |
| 84. | Weidlinger Associates | 18,000,000 |
| 85. | WWCOT | 17,955,000 |
| 86. | L. Robert Kimball & Associates | 17,340,260 |
| 87. | Ingenium Group | 17,262,000 |
| 88. | Albert Kahn Associates | 17,157,000 |
| 89. | Degenkolb Engineers | 17,010,080 |
| 90. | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | 16,984,191 |
| 91. | Fentress Architects | 16,902,540 |
| 92. | Kaplan McLaughlin Diaz | 16,900,000 |
| 93. | Benham Cos., The | 16,770,115 |
| 94. | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 16,050,000 |
| 95. | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 15,684,812 |
| 96. | RNL Design | 15,485,440 |
| 97. | Henneman Engineering | 14,910,000 |
| 98. | Mazzetti & Associates | 14,620,000 |
| 99. | Astorino | 14,409,912 |
| 100. | Ross & Baruzzini | 14,400,000 |
Comments on: "Top 100 institutional design firms "
BLOG ARCHIVE
Top Articles
No building owner wants to be caught unprepared by catastrophic roof failure. Emergency roof replacements tend to be more expensive than planned ones, and damage to interiors may mean unrecovered costs and detrimental...
Concrete has long been a reliable building material for commercial and institutional projects. Yet recent trends, including the growth in hospitality and urban rental project starts, as well as mixed-use towers and transit-...
Until recently, it has been lighting, mechanical, and control system upgrades which have received the most attention in the green building movement. At long last, the industry is now recognizing building enclosures as a long...
Brick and stone masonry have served as reliable and valuable elements of commercial building projects for centuries, gracing urban and rural landscapes since time immemorial. Building Teams have trusted clay brick to bring...
Buildings Teams have long sought to keep water out of buildings, to prevent corrosion, rot, and other damage and to keep building occupants comfortable and dry. Yet only recently has air infiltration also been seen as a...
Learning Objectives
After completing this course, you will be able to:
Ambient noise levels in some facility types are trending up and becoming a barrier to clear communication between building occupants. A 2005 study conducted by Ilene Busch-Vishniac, PhD, a dean and professor of mechanical...
Download Complete White Paper Download Introduction Download Chapters 1-4Defining Net-Zero Energy Buildings
Our seventh White Paper on Green Buildings focuses on the role of water in sustainable design and construction. The editors conclude with a set of 21 detailed recommendations for the consideration of the Building Teams, home...
Click here to read BD+C's 2008 White Paper: Green Buildings + Climate Change
Click here to read BD+C's 2007 Green Buildings Research White Paper: Where Building Owners, End Users and AEC Professionals Stand on Sustainability and Green Building
Click here to read BD+C White Paper 2006: Green Buildings and the Bottom Line The ‘New Reality’ of Green Building From Environmental Cause to Financial Opportunity
Click here to read BD+C's Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability White Paper 2005
It’s time to raise the performance of our existing commercial buildings. To reduce energy consumption. To increase durability. To lessen environmental impact and lifecycle cost. The 4.8 million existing commercial buildings...
Wired glass was the only fire rated glass (FRG) product available for over 100 years. In traditional wired glass, the embedded wires hold annealed glass in place during the fire test to achieve a fire rating. While the wires...
Building project teams involved in design- build and other forms of integrated project delivery (IPD) face new and fast-moving chal- lenges in project team organization, software and hardware, networking, file sharing and...
To benefit from new building design and construction technologies as well as novel project management approaches, leading AEC organizations of all sizes and scales are deploying building information modeling (BIM). While the...
|
|
Top Rated Articles
-
A gothic-style structure is reconstructed into comfortable, modern patient residence facility for the American Cancer Society.
-
After running what is today the largest architecture firm in the world for more than four decades, M. Arthur Gensler, Jr., FAIA, FIIDA, RIBA, is content to be just another employee at the firm that bears his name.
-
An expert conservator provides a three-step approach to determining a historic building’s “period of significance”—and how to restore its painted surfaces to the correct patterns and colors.
-
The giant architecture firm succeeds by giving each of its more than 3,000 employees the opportunity for career growth and professional leadership.
-
Earn 1.0 AIA/CES learning units by studying this article and successfully completing the online exam.
AWARDS
Award Winners
View BD+C’s award-winning projects and people, including our ‘40 Under 40’ superstars, top projects from our Building Team Awards and Reconstruction Awards programs, and the Best AEC Firms to Work For.