Finally, a look at actual energy use in real buildings, in a real city

February 14, 2013 |
Rob Cassidy

New York City’s recent report on energy and water use in 2,065 commercial buildings (totaling more than 530 million sf) deserves a closer look. The extremely valuable data was gathered under Local Law 84, which required owners of large privately owned buildings to report their energy and water use to the city.

That New York City was able to pull off this feat is remarkable in and of itself, since gathering data on actual energy and water use on large numbers of privately owned buildings (>50,000 sf for a single building, or multiple buildings totaling >100,000 sf) in a municipality has been virtually impossible.

In fact, this is the first such report for any city, county, or state in the U.S.. Previously, the city measured energy/water use in 2,657 city-owned buildings totaling 273 million sf. Moreover, starting this year, large residential buildings will also be counted, providing even more juicy data.

Kudos to Mayor Bloomberg and the Institute for Market Transformation for pulling this off.

Key findings from the report (with my comments in parentheses):

•  Large office buildings tend to be more energy intensive than smaller ones. (Why? Bigger plug load in large buildings? This finding cries out for further analysis.)

•  Newer office buildings in New York tend to use more energy per square foot than older ones. (Is that because newer buildings have more energy-intensive equipment—computers, data centers, telephone equipment? Or is it poor building envelope design?  A lot depends on the types of tenants and their differing energy needs: An ad agency probably uses much less energy than, say, a 24/7 financial firm. One factor may be that those thick walls and inset windows of pre-1950s structures seem to keep paying off in energy savings for their owners.)

•  On average, buildings in New York City use less energy than the national average, with a median Energy Star score of 64. (Not bad: A score of 75 out of 100 is needed to be listed as an Energy Star building, so New York’s average building stock is just at the edge.)

•  The most energy-intensive buildings use three to five times as much energy as the least energy-intensive buildings, so making cost-effective improvements to the big energy guzzlers could have a huge payoff in energy savings. (We’ve been preaching this gospel for a long time—see our White Paper, “High-Performance Reconstructed Buildings,” at: www.BDCnetwork.com/WhitePaper2012.)

•  Bringing large buildings up to the median energy use intensity in their respective categories could cut their energy use by 18% and GHG emissions by 20%. (The next NYC report should look into how much that would cost the typical large-building owner and what the payback period or internal rate of return would be. My guess is three to five years for many improvements, even without government subsidies or other financial incentives. Why more owners don’t get the math is beyond me.)

Results for individual buildings also proved enlightening. As Mireya Navarro noted in the New York Times, losers include the MetLife Building (Energy Star score: 39), Lever House (20), and Mies van der Rohe’s Seagram Building (3). The new LEED-Gold 7 World Trade Center came in with a 74, while the recently renovated Empire State Building did even better (80). My favorite, the Chrysler Building, came in at 84.

So, America’s cities, what are you waiting for? Start counting energy use in your buildings!

Download the report at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/gbee/html/plan/ll84_scores.shtml.

Rob Cassidy | Building Team Blog

Rob Cassidy (“ClimateGrouch”) is editorial director of Building Design+Construction. A city planner, he is the author of several books, including “Livable Cities,” and was a co-founder of the Friends of the Chicago River.

Related Blogs

Why AEC firms should be cultivating 'visible experts'

Photo: Cydcor via flickr creative commons

July 07, 2015 | Architects | Building Team Blog

A new study pinpoints the true dollar value of having knowledge leaders and market shapers on your team....

Tactical urbanism: Why bigger isn’t always better in urban revitalization

Each September, as part of Park(ing) Day, citizens, artists, and activists in more than 160 cities collaborate to temporarily transform metered parking spaces into micro parks, gardens, and art exhibits. Photo: my.parkingday.org

May 27, 2015 | Smart and Resilient Cities | Building Team Blog

A budding urban planning movement that is sprouting in cities across the globe proves that low-cost, small-...

Hackathons and RFCs: Why one developer killed the RFP

Image depicts design concepts from the hackathon winner, Pickard Chilton of New Haven, Conn. Photo courtesy Skanska

May 06, 2015 | Building Owner | Building Team Blog

In lieu of an RFP process, Skanska Commercial Development hosted a three-week "hackathon" to find an archit...

Chance encounters and the ‘action’ office: Do collisions spark innovation?

Google is among a handful of tech giants to unveil plans for “action” offices. Rendering courtesy Google, BIG, Thomas Heatherwick

March 29, 2015 | Office Building Design | Building Team Blog

Google, Facebook, Samsung, and Tencent have all unveiled plans for “action” offices designed to get their p...

The High Line effect: Placemaking as an economic development engine

Eight years into the transformation of an elevated section of New York Central Railroad’s West Side Line into a public park, the $273 million project is being hailed as a resounding win for the city. Photo: Beyond My Ken via Wikimedia Commons

March 02, 2015 | Cultural Facilities | Building Team Blog

As big money and eager tourists flock to Chelsea, cities across the globe are starting to take notice. Chic...

Photo: Infrogmation via Wikimedia Commons

The National Institute of Building Sciences estimates the retrofit market for small commercial buildings at $35.6 billion. Photo: Infrogmation via Wikimedia Commons

January 28, 2015 | Office Building Design | Building Team Blog

The real opportunity for shrinking the nation’s energy footprint lies in the mundane world of small commerc...

This past October, 78 young AEC professionals gathered in New York City for leadership development and networking during BD+C's Under 40 Leadership Summit.

January 21, 2015 | Building Team Blog
Many AEC firms focus on training for the hard skills of the profession, not so much for business prowess,...

Photo: Joe Mabel via Wikimedia Commons

December 22, 2014 | Building Team Blog

Commercial and residential construction can be as different as night and day. But as one who covered the ho...

American Standard's SaTo sanitary toilet pans (shown here installed in a latrine in Haiti) seal off pit latrines from flies to prevent the spread of pathogens.

December 08, 2014 | Building Team Blog

When we see the incredible technology being produced by global plumbing manufacturers, it’s hard to conceiv...

Add new comment

Your Information
Your Comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture. Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.
Overlay Init