Inefficient supply chains, outdated project delivery systems hamper construction investment

Constructing and justifying the cost of physical assets such as a manufacturing plant is much more difficult than it was decades ago, according to a report by Steffen Fuchs, senior partner with McKinsey & Company.

Inflation, rigorous sustainability requirements, and rapid changes in technology and regulations all complicate investment in new construction projects, the report says. “Adding to the complexity, the next generation of assets needs to be “set and forget”: the high cost of building them must be offset by lower operating costs,” Fuchs writes.

Improvements in construction processes and project delivery are especially necessary given that a new wave of “once-in-a-lifetime” capital spending on physical assets will take place between now and 2027. Roughly $130 trillion will pour into projects to decarbonize and renew critical infrastructure, Fuchs writes.

Project leaders typically rely on practices that aim to optimize individual investments, such as a nuclear power plant, an oil refinery, or a pipeline. Cost overruns are typical and costly using this approach. New decarbonization and sustainability investments where groups of similar projects (such as wind farms and solar parks) are delivered repeatedly over a long period of time require much better performance, Fuchs says.

An ordinance would amend county building codes to promote better walking environments, encourage more bicycling, improve access to healthy foods (farmers markets, community gardens), and enhance project review requirements to ensure that developers include healthy-lifestyle components in their building plans.