To a large degree, building security is driven by the integration of a variety of electronic security systems. The market and engineering of these systems exploded in the post-9/11 era and has shown few signs of tapering off. “Rapid advances in technology and government directives are driving purchase decisions, especially in the replacement of legacy systems,” says the Security Industry Association in a recent report.
One challenge has been that security technology began to outpace the knowledge of many Building Teams. Their most daunting question: whether to adopt the latest and best technology, or to invest in a reasonably reliable, less expensive system that has a positive track record. The response by leading design and construction experts has been to plan ahead and work with system integrators for the facility being developed.
For large commercial and multifamily projects, Building Teams typically focus on three types of systems: 1) access control, 2) intrusion detection, and 3) visual surveillance.
Access control. Two electronic access technologies are at the forefront: biometrics and radio frequency identification (RFID). Of the two, RFID is the more commonplace: even less secure facilities may invest in simple ID tags with stored electronic information, such as public parking garages. RFID systems are widely available, and the tags and cards are essentially disposable.
The downside of most RFID technology is the ease of access to the stored information on the card. Smart cards, by contrast, constructed with an embedded chip, can be made highly secure and difficult to forge, duplicate, or hack, which allows for the safe storage of personal and sensitive information on the card. Though the smart card can be operated by proximity reading like an RFID tag to allow secure access to stored data or physical access to a secure area, smart card systems are more expensive than their chipless counterparts.
A recent trend in the industry is to consider the use of biometrics––identification through the scan of the occupant’s fingerprint, retina, or similarly unique biophysical aspect––in tandem with RFID, rather than as an alternative.
Two types of hybrid systems are currently in use: one with biometric and RFID systems independent of one another (essentially a redundancy system), and others that integrate the RFID and biometric systems natively. One of the first such systems employed a processor chip that required a positive fingerprint ID before releasing access to the information stored in the RFID tag.
Whether integrated or not, combining RFID and biometrics is currently seen as offering the highest levels of security.
Intrusion detection. According to the Security Industry Association report, 75% of those interviewed reported that their facilities were equipped with intrusion- and fire-detection systems. Of those without such systems, about 66% reported that they would need such a system within five years, and about half said they would have one installed within five years.
Apart from the fact that a majority of facilities use or will use electronic intrusion-detection and alarm systems, the market is otherwise divided on the types of systems to employ, and whether to integrate detection with other electronic systems.
Because there is always the possibility of false alarms, planning should include consideration of integrating intrusion detection with video surveillance or some other system for verification. This is especially important if the detection system is wired to alert police (or fire) response directly. According to the same SIA report, “Many communities are adopting ‘no-response’ policies to false alarms if they are not verified by audio, video, or eyewitnesses.”
Video surveillance. The technology behind a system of security cameras is an important decision that receives plenty of discussion during project planning. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) analog cameras recording onto a DVR may seem adequate until cost-benefit questions and systems integration issues arise. Analog signals can be encoded to digital, but the analog camera’s resolution will limit the recording’s quality, according to Sean A. Ahrens, Global Leader for Aon Fire Protection Engineering’s security consulting practice, who sits on standards-setting panels for both SIA and UL. Enhancement of an encoded digital image is much more difficult than that of direct digital.
Digital cameras are also preferred today because they are relatively inexpensive, even with high megapixel capture. The downside is the growing need for data storage, but that can be mitigated through programming to record only when the system detects a change from a reference frame. Especially useful in low-traffic environments, this aspect of direct digital technology offers flexibility for data storage requirements.
What’s more, this aspect dovetails with security integration schemes. The intrusion detection system that requires video verification to alert authorities can depend upon the digital camera to register any change in its recording field. High-megapixel cameras can also be integrated as a biometric access control, using facial recognition software.
Ahrens also points out that data storage concerns associated with direct digital are being addressed within the IT industry, through programs to encode and decode digital signals, called codecs. A new codec called H.264 requires substantially less data storage, about half that of MPEG-2, while enhancing video performance compared to what is currently available, or MPEG-4, says Ahrens. “Anyone considering the procurement of a digital recording solution should ensure that it is capable of running H.264 and other future and more robust codecs,” he says.
His advice: Be proactive now, and you will be able to garner future benefits. +
Related Stories
Sponsored | | May 3, 2014
Fire-rated glass floor system captures light in science and engineering infill
In implementing Northwestern University’s Engineering Life Sciences infill design, Flad Architects faced the challenge of ensuring adequate, balanced light given the adjacent, existing building wings. To allow for light penetration from the fifth floor to the ground floor, the design team desired a large, central atrium. One potential setback with drawing light through the atrium was meeting fire and life safety codes.
| Apr 25, 2014
Recent NFPA 80 updates clarify fire rated applications
Code confusion has led to misapplications of fire rated glass and framing, which can have dangerous and/or expensive results. Two recent NFPA 80 revisions help clarify the confusion. SPONSORED CONTENT
| Apr 8, 2014
Fire resistive curtain wall helps The Kensington meet property line requirements
The majority of fire rated glazing applications occur inside a building to allow occupants to exit the building safely or provide an area of refuge during a fire. But what happens when the threat of fire comes from the outside? This was the case for The Kensington, a mixed-use residential building in Boston.
Sponsored | | Jan 30, 2014
Transparent, fire rated stairwell enhances design of renovated Cincinnati Art Museum
When the Cincinnati Art Museum embarked on an $11 million renovation, the architects wanted the entrance and main stair to be as inviting as possible. Transparent, fire rated glazing from SAFTI FIRST was a key component of the design solution.
| Jan 13, 2014
AEC professionals weigh in on school security
An exclusive survey reveals that Building Teams are doing their part to make the nation’s schools safer in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook tragedy.
| Jan 10, 2014
What the states should do to prevent more school shootings
To tell the truth, I didn’t want to write about the terrible events of December 14, 2012, when 20 children and six adults were gunned down at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. I figured other media would provide ample coverage, and anything we did would look cheap or inappropriate. But two things turned me around.
| Jan 10, 2014
Special Report: K-12 school security in the wake of Sandy Hook
BD+C's exclusive five-part report on K-12 school security offers proven design advice, technology recommendations, and thoughtful commentary on how Building Teams can help school districts prevent, or at least mitigate, a Sandy Hook on their turf.
| Jan 9, 2014
16 recommendations on security technology to take to your K-12 clients
From facial recognition cameras to IP-based door hardware, here are key technology-related considerations you should discuss with your school district clients.
| Dec 13, 2013
Safe and sound: 10 solutions for fire and life safety
From a dual fire-CO detector to an aspiration-sensing fire alarm, BD+C editors present a roundup of new fire and life safety products and technologies.
| Dec 5, 2013
Exclusive BD+C survey shows reaction to Sandy Hook tragedy
More than 60% of AEC professionals surveyed by BD+C said their firms experienced heightened interest in security measures from school districts they worked with.
