The ‘fuzz factor’ in engineering: when continuous improvement is neither

The biggest threat to human life in a building isn’t the potential of natural disasters, but the threat of human error. I believe it’s a reality that increases in probability every time a code or standard change is proposed. 

January 12, 2014 |
Bob Zabcik

During my nearly 25-year career as an engineer, I've witnessed some 75 code and standard revision cycles representing thousands of pages of text requiring review and interpretation. 

The biggest threat to human life in a building isn’t the potential of natural disasters, but the threat of human error. I believe it’s a reality that increases in probability every time a code or standard change is proposed. 

I know the purpose of building codes and standards is to protect the public, who need protection from the very real threats of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, and freak snowstorms. As an engineer who has taken an oath to protect the public, that responsibility is paramount to me and one I carry with pride.

But the system we have set up to protect society has grown beyond a manageable state into monster status. Moreover, it is a venue filled with hundreds of hyper-sensitive, over-reacting people with individual research and commercial agendas, ballooning paper and free-running ink.

Dubbed the “fuzz factor,” this trend of growing complexity and shrinking time is one I believe poses a very real threat to public safety.

Instead of continuing to further define the problems and solutions like we’ve done so well in the last century, we need to consider evolving the engineering process to match the complexity level thrust upon the practitioners.

My solution: Have a peer engineer perform a simple cursory review of projects. 

To make this fully effective, it should not just be one or two peers. It should be more like five or 10 people with widely varied experiences and preferably strong cultural diversity, each one spending an hour or so scanning the results of the design, rather than the design itself.

Read more from the Star Buildings blog.

Editor's Note: This is sponsored content. All text and images were provided by the sponsor company. 

Bob Zabcik | Metal Building Trends
NCI
Director of Research and Development

Bob Zabcik is NCI’s Director of Research and Development. He is a LEED Accredited Professional and a Registered Professional Engineer with more than 20 years of experience. He serves on several professional committees such as the MBMA Energy Committee and Sustainability Committee as well as several task groups of those committees.  He is also on the Board of the Cool Metal Roofing Coalition and serves as the Director of their technical committee.

Related Blogs

July 02, 2018 | Energy Efficiency | Metal Building Trends

There is an efficient system for mounting solar panels to roofs and turning roof real estate into raw power...

March 14, 2018 | Metal Building Trends

Commercial transportation is getting more expensive, and it’s driving up the price of steel.  

February 19, 2018 | Insulation | Metal Building Trends

There is little doubt that the use of foam plastic insulation in metal building exterior roof and wall asse...

January 24, 2018 | Metal Building Trends

Studies have shown that daylight in the workplace increases productivity and general employee health, with...

January 15, 2018 | Metal Building Trends

The combination of design flexibility and high value-to-cost enable design professionals to provide their c...

December 28, 2017 | Metal Building Trends

The latest code cycle requires higher insulation values and an air barrier in the thermal envelope.

December 20, 2017 | Metal Building Trends

Metal building systems have great longevity… if properly maintained.

October 18, 2017 | Metals | Metal Building Trends

Star metal building systems have once again demonstrated their durability in extreme weather events.

Overlay Init