flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

5 guiding principles for solving airflow issues in open-plenum office spaces

5 guiding principles for solving airflow issues in open-plenum office spaces

Although architecturally appealing, exposed ceilings can create unwanted drafts and airflow problems if not engineered correctly.


By Bill Stangeland, McGuire Engineers, Chicago | November 10, 2014
While the exposed ceiling look is popular in todays commercial office spaces, s
While the exposed ceiling look is popular in todays commercial office spaces, some areas of dropped ceiling may be necessary to

While exposed ceilings in office interiors lend a spacious, open feel, this trendy architectural feature has created a new challenge: finding a viable return air path. Plenum ceilings use the area between the dropped ceiling and the floor slab above as a return air path, but when these dropped ceilings are removed, the plenum area is reduced and can restrict the flow of return air.

Since air will always take the path of least resistance, removing all or part of the dropped ceiling and reducing the plenum area can create unique pressure and return airflow patterns, which can vary on a daily, weekly, and seasonal basis, and are usually at their worst when the air handling system is economizer mode (taking in larger quantities of outside air).

Fortunately, with some sound engineering directive, it is often possible to preserve the exposed ceiling while promoting desirable return airflow patterns. Boiled down into five guiding principles, the following can be successfully applied to evaluate and often overcome the exposed ceiling challenge.

 

1. Better to oversize, not undersize, return air transfer openings.

While architects generally want return air openings to be as small as possible from an aesthetic point of view, engineers strongly recommend generously sizing them in order to encourage the air to properly flow through. Because air will take the path of least resistance to find its way back to the central return air duct and then to the air handling unit, if these openings are undersized, air may flow elsewhere.

One of the most common problems occurs when entry doors to a space are opened and air rushes through these doors. In severe conditions, the doors may even stay partially open due to the strong airflow. A good rule of thumb is to size return air transfer openings so that the air flows through at a low velocity of roughly 250 feet per minute.

 

2. Select areas of dropped ceilings are often necessary.

In addition to the potentially undesirable aesthetics associated with larger return air openings, exposed ceilings can pose significant acoustical challenges as well. Whether it’s a fan-powered box, duct leakage from improperly sealed ductwork or the sound of air traveling back to the main return, large, open ceilings provide no barrier to attenuate sound.

One potential solution could be dropping in a few architectural clouds, particularly in places where the main return air openings are located (typically near building “core” areas – i.e. elevator banks). For spaces that are particularly challenged acoustically, add sides on the clouds to create a more effective acoustical buffer while still preserving the open plenum look and hiding unsightly mechanical equipment.

 

3. Avoid returning air through adjacent tenant spaces.

In some buildings with dropped ceilings, return air was designed to run above multiple tenant spaces to find its way back to the central return opening. However, when two tenants with open ceilings are located next to one another, running return air from one tenant space through another is not only undesirable (your neighbor won’t appreciate the smell of your burnt popcorn), but in all likelihood does not meet local code requirements either. 

In order to mitigate this, the engineering team should take a holistic look at the building design to figure out exactly how the air is flowing so that a proper return air path can be created for all tenant spaces.

 

4. Carefully survey the core area ceilings to identify ductwork or other items impeding the free flow of re-turn air.

While generously sizing the return plenum air opening can be an effective way to support optimal air-flow, if the core space is packed with ductwork and/or piping, and thus reducing the area of the return air path, it can create insurmountable challenges. Even if return air openings to the plenum are generously sized, a congested return air plenum will restrict airflow and may still result in undesirable airflow patterns as noted in Item 1. 

McGuire was brought in to help with corrections on a recent project: a new tenant occupying two floors inside a Midwest office building added a stairwell to connect their floors. The upper floor’s return air plenum was very congested, which had never been an issue until the new stair was added. The stairwell introduced a new path for the air to flow, creating significant draft issues in the lower floor’s reception area.

In cases such as these, creative engineering must be employed to provide another more appropriate path for the airflow.

 

5. Every building is different and main air system imbalance or congested corridor ceilings may be difficult or impossible to overcome.

Yet another potential difficulty with exposed ceilings comes into play when a high percentage of outside air is desired for natural ventilation. For example, on a 55°F to 60°F day, a building’s air handling units may run in economizer mode to bring in larger amounts of outside air for “free” cooling. Of course, this same air needs to be returned and exhausted. If an adequate return air path isn’t properly designed—perhaps due to congested ceilings or inadequate transfer openings  – the return air problems can often be exacerbated when the building systems are in economizer mode. In such a situation, the building may decide to limit the percentage of outside air intake. While the optimal solution may be to significantly change the layout and re-engineer the space, such an approach may be cost prohibitive. 

 

Careful Consideration

When moving into an existing building and redesigning your space with an open plenum, all HVAC idiosyncrasies must be carefully evaluated. While airflow in an existing tenant space with closed ceilings may be working just fine, once the ceiling is opened up, issues can arise. If any significant issues with regards to the main building air system are discovered, an open ceiling may simply not work, unless the building owner is willing to make the required changes to support a proper return air flow design.

When considering an exposed ceiling for a tenant build-out, it’s important to confer with the facility manager about air patterns, in addition to speaking with other tenants in the building who may have exposed ceilings to learn more about how the air is flowing through those particular spaces.

Armed with this information, the building team can better determine exactly how to design the desired open ceiling space and air plenum to support the architect’s plan, both aesthetically and functionally – maintaining optimal comfort for all occupants.

 

About the Author
Bill Stangeland is President and Partner with McGuire Engineers. He has more than 30 years of experience in HVAC and plumbing systems design. He is responsible for overall quality control of the firm's business, fostering client satisfaction, and the mentoring and development of new and existing staff. Stangeland's extensive experience encompasses commercial projects, branch banks, churches, auditoriums, medical office buildings, and out-patient surgical suites. He maintains strong client relationships by delivering successful projects that meet each client's unique goals and needs.

Related Stories

| May 25, 2011

Register today for BD+C’s June 8th webinar on restoration and reconstruction projects

Based on new and award-winning building projects, this webinar presents our “expert faculty” to examine the key issues affecting project owners, designers and contractors in case studies ranging from gut renovations and adaptive reuses to restorations and retrofits.

| May 25, 2011

Hotel offers water beds on a grand scale

A semi-submerged resort hotel is the newest project from Giancarlo Zema, a Rome-based architect known for his organic maritime designs. The hotel spans one kilometer and has both land and sea portions.

| May 25, 2011

Smithsonian building $45 million green lab

Thanks to a $45 million federal appropriation to the Smithsonian Institution, the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Edgewater, Md., has broken ground on what is expected to be one of the most energy-efficient laboratories in the country. The 69,000-sf lab is targeting LEED Gold and is expected to use 37% less energy and emit 37% less carbon dioxide than a similar building.

| May 25, 2011

World’s tallest building now available in smaller size

Emaar Properties teamed up with LEGO to create a miniature version of the Burj Khalifa as part of the LEGO Architecture series. Currently, the LEGO Burj Khalifa is available only in Dubai, but come June 1, 2011, it will be available worldwide.

| May 25, 2011

Developers push Manhattan office construction

Manhattan developers are planning the city's biggest decade of office construction since the 1980s, betting on rising demand for modern space even with tenants unsigned and the availability of financing more limited. More than 25 million sf of projects are under construction or may be built in the next nine years.

| May 25, 2011

Olympic site spurs green building movement in UK

London's environmentally friendly 2012 Olympic venues are fuelling a green building movement in Britain.

| May 25, 2011

TOTO tests universal design at the AIA conference

If you could be 80 years old for 30 minutes—and have to readjust everything you think you know about your own mobility—would you do it?

| May 20, 2011

Hotels taking bath out of the bathroom

Bathtubs are disappearing from many hotels across the country as chains use the freed-up space to install ever more luxurious showers, according to a recent USAToday report. Of course, we reported on this move--and 6 other hospitality trends--back in 2006 in our special report "The Inn Things: Seven Radical New Trends in Hotel Design."

| May 19, 2011

BD+C’s "40 Under 40" winners for 2011

The 40 individuals profiled here are some of the brightest stars in the AEC universe—and they’re under the age of 40. These young architects, engineers, contractors, designers, and developers stood out among a group of 164 outstanding entrants in our sixth annual “40 Under 40” competition.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category

Mass Timber

Bjarke Ingels Group designs a mass timber cube structure for the University of Kansas

Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) and executive architect BNIM have unveiled their design for a new mass timber cube structure called the Makers’ KUbe for the University of Kansas School of Architecture & Design. A six-story, 50,000-sf building for learning and collaboration, the light-filled KUbe will house studio and teaching space, 3D-printing and robotic labs, and a ground-level cafe, all organized around a central core.




halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021