flexiblefullpage -
billboard - default
interstitial1 - interstitial
catfish1 - bottom
Currently Reading

Submission period ends for second version of National BIM Standard

Submission period ends for second version of National BIM Standard


Jeff Yoders | July 15, 2011

Following an 86-day open ballot period, the National Institute of Building Sciences buildingSMART Alliance has closed the submission period to develop Version 2 of the National BIM Standard-United States.

The first version of the National BIM Standard (NBIMS Version 1) was passed in 2007, but it has failed to move out of academia and into the AEC community significantly mainly because of its reliance on the IFC (Industry Foundation Class) file format for 3D modeling.

The ballots for this submission period were separated into categories relating to: reference standards; information exchanges, including model view definitions (MVDs) and information delivery manuals (IDMs); best practices; and overview and guidelines, including updates to the NBIMS Version 1, Part 1. Of the ballot submissions, 36 were complete entries and nine were “blue sky submissions,” or ideas that will need more input before becoming a ballot or going for a vote to be included in the standard.

Several of the ballot submissions, if approved by the voting membership, will significantly expand the current standard. One ballot would add the BIM Project Execution Planning Guide, Version 2.1, updated in May 2011 by its developers at Penn State University in State College, Pa., to the NBIMS. The Penn State guide has been used by numerous organizations across the industry to coordinate BIM implementation. The comment period for the new ballot items will begin Aug. 3 and end Sept. 1.

If you’d like to join the NBIMS project committee, you can download an application form at the buildingSMART Alliance’s website.

boombox1 - default
boombox2 -
native1 -

More In Category




Reconsidering construction robotics

After decades when experts predicted that robots would become more prevalent on construction sites, it would appear that the industry has finally reached that point where necessity, aspiration, and investment are colliding. 

halfpage1 -

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â