Building Teams need to help owners avoid 'operational stray'

"Operational stray" occurs when a building’s MEP systems don’t work the way they should. Even the most well-designed and constructed building can stray from perfection—and that can cost the owner a ton in unnecessary utility costs. But help is on the way.

November 25, 2013 |
Rob Cassidy

"Operational stray" occurs when a building’s mechanical, electrical, or plumbing systems don’t work the way they should. As we’ll see, even the most well-designed and constructed building can stray from perfection—and that can cost the owner a ton in unnecessary utility costs. But help is on the way!

That help comes in the form of a report from the Natural Resources Defense Council. In “Real-time Energy Management,” NRDC’s Philip Henderson and Meg Waltner document the results of an eye-opening experiment.

Last year, NRDC convinced the Tower Companies real estate firm to have a couple of MEP consulting firms install energy meters and monitoring/alarm systems on the chillers and HVAC systems of three of its large office buildings in Washington, D.C. This setup gave Tower’s facilities staff real-time management of the buildings’ energy use over a one-year period.

The system enabled the building engineers to find problems they might never have discovered. In one building, faulty VAV controls were telling the chiller to turn on even though the building management system was signaling it to stay off. Early detection saved a lot of energy.

In another case, daily usage charts indicated that one chiller seemed to be cycling on and off for no good reason. The consultants alerted the building engineer, who found the water temperature to be well above the set point, triggering the chiller to shut off. The culprit? A blocked strainer that was restricting water flow to the chiller, causing the temperature to spike. The filter was cleaned, and the chiller returned to normal operation. There are numerous other examples of operational stray like these in the NRDC report. 

How did this miracle cure pencil out? Total cost of setup and a year of operation for all three buildings: $144,320. Total energy savings: $218,703. Average energy savings: 13.2%.

But, you protest, Tower must have cherry-picked some real dogs for the experiment. In fact, the buildings had Energy Star scores of 71, 78, and 86 (out of 100). After a year in the program, their scores had improved to 87, 88, and 91.

More “typical” buildings likely would do even better. And the nice thing about the experiment is that, unlike an expensive retrofit, it was not all that disruptive to the buildings’ occupants. Why, then, don’t more building owners do what Tower did to attack the problem of operational stray? And what can AEC firms do to help them?

The answer to the first question is ignorance—and inertia. Unlike Tower, most commercial property owners either don’t realize how badly their buildings may be performing, or they couldn’t be bothered and just chalk up the extra costs.

As for what AEC firms can do, there are several opportunities. For one, engineering firms in particular might look at extending their business line to include services to deal with operational stray, especially in underserved markets.

AEC firms can also encourage their clients to include metering and notification systems in new and reconstructed buildings, in the certain knowledge that MEP systems, even in the most exquisitely designed and constructed buildings, will eventually fall victim to operational stray.

If a client doesn’t want to assume the extra cost of installing such systems, you should still make sure to design the building such that meters and monitoring systems can be easily and cost-effectively installed at a later date, should the building come into the hands of a more enlightened owner.

Send your comments to: [email protected].

Rob Cassidy | Building Team Blog

Rob Cassidy (“ClimateGrouch”) is editorial director of Building Design+Construction. A city planner, he is the author of several books, including “Livable Cities,” and was a co-founder of the Friends of the Chicago River.

Related Blogs

Benjamin Kasdan, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB, Design Director/Senior Designer with KTGY Architecture + Planning, Irvine, Calif. (Class of 2015 40 Under 40 winner)

October 26, 2015 | Building Team Blog

Are you an AEC superstar? The 2016 "40 Under 40" competition is now open for entries. Here are some helpful...

Competency-based learning: A glimpse into the future of higher education?

Photo: Xbxg32000 via Wikimedia Commons

October 16, 2015 | University Buildings | Building Team Blog

For better or worse, the higher education experience for many young Millennials and Gen Zers will not resem...

From Gehry to the High Line: What makes a project a game-changer?

El Peix sculpture in Barcelona, by Frank Gehry. Photo: Till Niermann via Wikimedia Commons

September 24, 2015 | Architects | Building Team Blog

Each year, there are a handful of projects that significantly advance the AEC industry or a particular buil...

Why AEC firms should be cultivating 'visible experts'

Photo: Cydcor via flickr creative commons

July 07, 2015 | Architects | Building Team Blog

A new study pinpoints the true dollar value of having knowledge leaders and market shapers on your team....

Tactical urbanism: Why bigger isn’t always better in urban revitalization

Each September, as part of Park(ing) Day, citizens, artists, and activists in more than 160 cities collaborate to temporarily transform metered parking spaces into micro parks, gardens, and art exhibits. Photo:

May 27, 2015 | Smart and Resilient Cities | Building Team Blog

A budding urban planning movement that is sprouting in cities across the globe proves that low-cost, small-...

Hackathons and RFCs: Why one developer killed the RFP

Image depicts design concepts from the hackathon winner, Pickard Chilton of New Haven, Conn. Photo courtesy Skanska

May 06, 2015 | Building Owner | Building Team Blog

In lieu of an RFP process, Skanska Commercial Development hosted a three-week "hackathon" to find an archit...

Chance encounters and the ‘action’ office: Do collisions spark innovation?

Google is among a handful of tech giants to unveil plans for “action” offices. Rendering courtesy Google, BIG, Thomas Heatherwick

March 29, 2015 | Office Building Design | Building Team Blog

Google, Facebook, Samsung, and Tencent have all unveiled plans for “action” offices designed to get their p...

The High Line effect: Placemaking as an economic development engine

Eight years into the transformation of an elevated section of New York Central Railroad’s West Side Line into a public park, the $273 million project is being hailed as a resounding win for the city. Photo: Beyond My Ken via Wikimedia Commons

March 02, 2015 | Cultural Facilities | Building Team Blog

As big money and eager tourists flock to Chelsea, cities across the globe are starting to take notice. Chic...

Photo: Infrogmation via Wikimedia Commons

The National Institute of Building Sciences estimates the retrofit market for small commercial buildings at $35.6 billion. Photo: Infrogmation via Wikimedia Commons

January 28, 2015 | Office Building Design | Building Team Blog

The real opportunity for shrinking the nation’s energy footprint lies in the mundane world of small commerc...

Add new comment

Your Information
Your Comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture. Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.
Overlay Init