Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Building Design & Construction

A/E/C Websites: good, bad, or ugly?

June 26, 2009

As an editor on Building Design+Construction, I’m used to seeing buildings with beautiful architecture or ones exhibiting amazing engineering feats or innovative renovations and re-uses. It’s one of the perks of the job.

However, I’m surprised that the architects, engineers, and developers responsible for such fantastic buildings have some really dreadful Websites.

Some make it overly complicated to enter (large, slow flash presentations showing…nothing, really); others are difficult to navigate, which makes it virtually impossible to find a particular building, project, or person; while others are plain boring. (I won’t name names, but you know who you are…)

However, I’ve recently come across a few impressive ones—excelling in design, functionality, layout, "fun factor"—that I think could serve as the benchmark for A/E/C Websites. Check them out:

Diller Scofidio + Renfro

Jonathan Bailey Associates

Space Architects + Planners

Agree? Disagree? What has your experience been using a Website for an A/E/C firm? Any great sites that you think raise the bar?

Post your comments below.

Posted by Jay Schneider on June 26, 2009 | Comments (1)

August 7, 2009
In response to: A/E/C Websites: good, bad, or ugly?
Brett commented:

Hi Jay great post! I Agree with you 100%, those sites are pretty nice. I still come away with the question: Why make a complicated navigation on a site, only to frustrate a user, with fancy flash effects? Sometimes it can be overused. We are Web design firm that enjoys working on A/E/C firm sites, but I would have to agree with you on some horrible sites out there that we have seen. We believe in the KISS principal. ("Keep it Short and Simple" or "Keep it Simple, Stupid") We specialize in easy to manage CMS based sites, with minimal flash. The minimal flash has actually been at the request of the firm’s management. They feel that they need a site that is flash “like” but can easily maintained by staff and grow with firm’s needs. A robust CMS is a perfect fit. Examples Sites: www[dot]studioswarch.com www[dot]dpsdesign.org

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
NEWSLETTERS
BD+C eNews
BD+C Issue Announcement
BDC Hot Topics Report
BDCnetwork Product Solutions
BDC eAlert
BDCnetwork Product TV
BD+C Login In and Learn



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Free Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy