FREE
Subscriptions:
Quick Links:
:: Print Edition
:: Digital Edition
:: eNewsletters
:: Reader Service
:: Webcasts
:: White Papers
:: Award Programs
:: Store

Site Search
Powered by Zibb

Sponsored By
Supplier Search
Products/Services
Companies

Site Sponsors

Directories
Office Furniture
Computer Desks
Canopies
Awnings
Cabanas
Easi-Set Industries
Fabric Structures
Tension Structures Furniture Store
Honeywell
Nora® Rubber Flooring
Office Chairs
Alcan
Flooring
NFBA
HP Workstations



Illinois adopts anti-forum selection statute





When out-of-state contractors come into another state to perform work, they frequently bring with them contract clauses requiring any litigation or arbitration to be conducted on their home turf instead of the jurisdiction of the job site. Earlier this year, Illinois joined several other states in enacting a statute declaring such anti-forum selection clauses to be unenforceable.

The Illinois statute says that any contract clause that makes the construction contract for an Illinois project subject to the laws of another state or requires any litigation or arbitration to be resolved in another state violates Illinois' public policy. The statute expressly does not apply to construction contracts awarded by the U.S. or any other state.

There are cases around the country, however, which say that such statutes may not be enforceable when the Federal Arbitration Act applies or in cases pending in the federal court system. The theory is that the federal statute preempts the state statute.


  

© 2008, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.




E-mail a friend Printer-friendly version



Talk Back

There are no comments posted for this article.

POST A COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE