By Daryl Delano, Reed Business Information Economist
May 1, 2002
Building Design and Construction
The combination of stagnant global demand, ample worldwide steel production capacity, and ever-increasing competition from imports has kept the lid on structural steel prices during the past two years, and this benign trend has continued into the early months of 2002.
Average prices for fabricated structural metal products used in construction eased a slight 0.1 percent during February 2002, after falling 0.2 percent the month before. And average structural building metal prices this February stood 1.8 percent lower
than during the same month in 2001.
Buyers paid an average of 1.6 percent less for structural steel used during 2001 than in 2000. But between 1999 and 2000, average structural metal costs rose by 2.6 percent.
Although newly instituted tariffs on U.S. steel imports will put some upward pressure on average prices across the board, products used by the construction sector have been largely spared any significant extra duties (See BD&C, 4/02, page 13). Consequently, it is unlikely that structural steel prices will fall much further this year, so average contract prices during 2002 should be little changed from 2001's comparatively affordable level.
Cost comparisons per square foot in select metro markets
Indoor sports
Enclosed swimming pool
Racquetball court
Bowling alley
Hockey rink/indoor soccer
Second quarter
'02
'01
% chg.
'02
'01
% chg.
'02
'01
% chg.
'02
'01
% chg.
Atlanta
140.94
136.52
3.2
105.32
102.85
2.4
62.41
60.25
3.6
107.52
97.81
9.9
Baltimore
143.93
140.65
2.3
107.56
105.96
1.5
63.73
62.08
2.7
109.80
100.77
9.0
Boston
180.90
176.31
2.6
135.18
132.83
1.8
80.10
77.82
2.9
138.00
126.32
9.2
Chicago
176.18
170.50
3.3
131.66
128.44
2.5
78.01
75.25
3.7
134.40
122.15
10.0
Cleveland
161.55
157.64
2.5
120.72
118.76
1.7
71.53
69.58
2.8
123.24
112.94
9.1
Dallas
134.02
130.09
3.0
100.15
98.01
2.2
59.34
57.42
3.3
102.24
93.20
9.7
Denver
149.91
146.77
2.1
112.03
110.57
1.3
66.38
64.78
2.5
114.36
105.15
8.8
Detroit
167.52
162.54
3.1
125.19
122.45
2.2
74.18
71.74
3.4
127.80
116.45
9.7
Houston
138.90
134.99
2.9
103.80
101.69
2.1
61.50
59.58
3.2
105.96
96.71
9.6
Kansas City
158.40
153.05
3.5
118.37
115.30
2.7
70.14
67.55
3.8
120.84
109.65
10.2
Los Angeles
170.36
166.06
2.6
127.31
125.10
1.8
75.43
73.29
2.9
129.96
118.97
9.2
Miami
133.86
131.78
1.6
100.04
99.27
0.8
59.27
58.16
1.9
102.12
94.41
8.2
Minneapolis
173.19
170.80
1.4
129.42
128.67
0.6
76.68
75.39
1.7
132.12
122.37
8.0
New Orleans
134.49
131.16
2.5
100.51
98.81
1.7
59.55
57.89
2.9
102.60
93.97
9.2
New York City
211.73
205.85
2.9
158.22
155.08
2.0
93.75
90.85
3.2
161.52
147.48
9.5
Philadelphia
174.92
171.42
2.0
130.72
129.14
1.2
77.45
75.66
2.4
133.44
122.81
8.7
Phoenix
140.63
136.67
2.9
105.09
102.96
2.1
62.27
60.32
3.2
107.28
97.92
9.6
Pittsburgh
159.97
155.35
3.0
119.55
117.03
2.2
70.83
68.56
3.3
122.04
111.29
9.7
Portland
166.42
164.22
1.3
124.37
123.72
0.5
73.69
72.48
1.7
126.96
117.65
7.9
St. Louis
162.02
157.95
2.6
121.08
118.99
1.8
71.74
69.71
2.9
123.60
113.16
9.2
San Diego
166.42
162.69
2.3
124.37
122.56
1.5
73.69
71.81
2.6
126.96
116.56
8.9
San Francisco
195.68
190.09
2.9
146.23
143.20
2.1
86.64
83.90
3.3
149.28
136.19
9.6
Seattle
165.79
160.09
3.6
123.90
120.60
2.7
73.41
70.66
3.9
126.48
114.69
10.3
Washington, D.C.
148.85
145.09
2.5
111.08
109.30
1.6
65.82
64.04
2.8
113.40
103.95
9.1
Winston/Salem
118.60
116.06
2.1
88.63
87.51
1.3
52.52
51.27
2.4
90.48
83.22
8.7
NOTE:
Costs are for the basic building and do not include sitework, land, development, specialty finishes or equipment. Square foot costs vary significantly from project to project because of quality, complexity and economic climate. For a detailed list of building components included in these figures, see Means Square Foot Costs. R.S. Means Co., P.O. Box 800, Kingston, MA 02364, (781) 585-7880, (800) 448-8182 For more data, visit R.S. Means on the Web at
www.rsmeans.com.
To use an interactive tool that helps estimate costs, visit www.buildingteam.com.
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Take advantage of available incentives up to $2,000 per unit on green, energy-saving measures for qualifying new construction initiatives.